Welcome to Inquisition Update.
My name's Tom Friess, and I'll be your host for the next hour.
You're listening to FirstAmendmentRadio .com.
Thanks for tuning in.
Now, I've been in a quandary for some time as to how to follow up R.
W.
Thompson's books.
And there really is no follow-up to those books.
And during this quandary, trying to decide what I should do after I finish those
books, I gave a thought to reading and discussing the book by Dave Hunt,
entitled A Woman Rides the Beast, The Roman Catholic Church in the Last
Days.
And I read the book in its entirety and came to the conclusion that, although the
book has much valuable things to say about the Vatican, about the Jesuits,
and about the New World Order, I would forego the reading of his book,
because Dave Hunt was obviously a futurist.
He was not an historicist, strictly speaking, as we recognize the Protestant
Reformers.
He too, like myself, was polluted with the futurist idea that the Antichrist doesn't
come until the last seven years of time, along about the same time as the Great
Tribulation, the seven years, which is nothing but a Jesuit twisting of Daniel 9,
verse 27.
And I didn't want to spend a good portion of the reading of this book in combat with
Dave Hunt.
But I have since changed my mind.
This needs to be combated.
Futurism needs to be confronted and combated.
And with no disrespect to Dave Hunt, rather by a demonstration of respect for
Dave Hunt, I'm going to read this book and avail myself and my listeners with the
value of this book, and at the same time, destroy the belief in futurism as best as
I can, as best as God has prepared me to do.
And it's not my purpose to bring disfavor to Dave Hunt's name.
And why would I do that?
Because for 50 years of my life, I believed in the futurist lie.
But it's going to take a long time, if ever, to reverse the
counter-reformation destruction of Protestantism by foisting this
misinterpretation of Daniel 9, verse 27.
But I'm going to give it my best shot.
Now, this book, again, is entitled, A Woman Rides the Beast, The Roman
Catholic Church and the Last Days.
It was written by Dave Hunt, who is now recently deceased.
And it has been probably, out of all the requests that I get for reading of books,
I've gotten more requests to read and comment on this book than any other.
So, in deference to those who have taken the time to write and request that I read
this book, here it is.
Beginning with the dedication of the book, Dave Hunt writes, To nearly 1 billion
Roman Catholics misinformed by their hierarchy, to the 400 million Protestants
equally ignorant of the facts, and to the genuine martyrs on both sides,
this book is dedicated.
It begins with the title, Overturning the Reformation.
Remember, the Pope cannot seat himself on a throne in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah,
if the Protestant Reformation is still living and breathing on the earth.
The Protestant Reformation, in order for the Vatican-Jesuit-led New World Order to
succeed, must be destroyed.
It's called the Counter-Reformation.
And the leading agents for the destruction of Protestantism, as we well know here on
Inquisition Update, is the Jesuit Order.
And the most powerful evidence of that goal for the Jesuits is embodied in their
very oath, which we have read from time to time here on this program, and it might be
even appropriate to read it now before we read this book.
But you can read it for yourself, just simply Google the title, The Extreme
Oath of the Jesuits, and you can read it for yourself.
And I recommend people print that out and keep copies of it to hand out to people,
and spread the word about what the Counter-Reformation entails.
Now, speaking of Overturning the Reformation, Dave Hunt says, The most
significant event in nearly 500 years of Church history was revealed as a fait
accompli on March 29, 1994.
On that day, leading American evangelicals and Catholics signed a joint declaration
titled, Evangelicals and Catholics Together, The Christian Mission in the
Third Millennium.
The document, in effect, overturned the Protestant Reformation, and will
unquestionably have far-reaching repercussions throughout the Christian
world for years to come.
This startling development was the culmination of careful planning and
negotiations over the previous two years, each step was continuously monitored and
approved by the Vatican.
The New York Times released making the announcement, which was carried in the
newspapers across the country on March 30th, said in part, They toiled together
in the movements against abortion and pornography, and now leading Catholics and
evangelicals are asking their flocks for a remarkable leap of faith, to finally
accept each other as Christians.
In what's being called a historic declaration, evangelicals including Pat
Robertson and Chuck Colson, and I will add both of those are 33rd degree Freemasons
working for the Jesuit General, one of the chief organizers joined with
conservative Roman Catholic leaders today in upholding the ties of faith that bind
the nation's largest and most politically active religious groups, Protestants and
Evangelicals.
It says they urged Catholics and Evangelicals to stop aggressive
proselytization of each other's flocks.
We call it commonly, no sheep stealing.
Leave the Catholics to be Catholics and the Evangelicals to be Evangelicals,
right?
It says John White, President, this is still from the quote, It says John
White, President of Geneva College and former President of the National
Association of Evangelicals, said the statement represents, quote, a
triumphalistic moment, unquote, in American religious life after centuries
of distrust.
Other evangelical endorsers include the heads of Home Mission Board and Christian
Life Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, who acted in an independent
capacity, the nation's largest Protestant denomination, and Bill Bright,
founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, Mark Knoll of Wheaton University,
Os Guinness, Jesse Miranda from Assemblies of God, Richard Mao, President from Fuller
Theological Seminary, J.I.
Packer and Herbert Schlossberg, unquote.
Now, Robert Simmons, Southern California Chairman of the National Association of
Evangelicals, applauded the declaration, unquote, and said he hoped it would bring,
quote, increased cooperation between Evangelicals and Catholics, unquote.
Other Evangelical leaders have since signed the declaration, while still others
have denounced it as a betrayal of the Protestant Reformation.
Ironically, this bold move to unite Catholics and Evangelicals will divide
Evangelicals as nothing else could, and as its endorsers must have realized.
That's right.
Rome's attempt to divide and conquer the non-Roman Catholic Christians in this
country, it's a very, very successful aspect of the Jesuit-led
counter-Reformation.
Look, if you've been a listener at all to Inquisition Update, I've proven over and
over and over again, both by the Bible and by history, by current events,
by Bible prophecy, by common sense, by current publications of papal
encyclicals, that this Roman Catholic Church cannot be in any way, shape,
or form described as a Christian Church.
It is the Church of Antichrist.
It is led by the Jesuit order, now for the first time in history,
a Jesuit actually occupying the seat of power in the Vatican.
For the first time in world history, there is a Jesuit priest, sworn to destroy
Protestantism, who now sits in the papal chair.
And this uniting of Roman Catholics and Evangelicals together, was designed from
the very beginning to be a destruction of Protestantism in conformity with the oath
that every Jesuit takes.
The Vatican has sworn to destroy the Protestant Reformation ever since the
Protestant Reformation began.
It is a matter of life and death to the Vatican.
I don't need to remind my regular listeners that the Protestant Reformation
nearly brought a permanent end to the Roman Catholic Church, to the Vatican,
to the papacy, and to all of his power, both temporal and spiritual in the world.
And now we see a reversal of that, a healing of the mortal wound,
and the Jesuit-led Counter-Reformation has answered the Protestant Reformation with a
lie that has deceived the whole Protestant world.
It's a lie that even Dave Hunt succumbed to.
It's called Futurism.
And this idea that Antichrist doesn't show up on the world scene until the last seven
years before Christ's return, this exonerates the papacy.
And this is what leads these men, these 33rd degree Freemasons, these
ecumenical evangelicals, these Catholics and evangelicals together, to repudiate
the Protestant Reformation, which said that the papacy, and only the papacy,
could be the Antichrist in the world.
The Protestant Reformation was literally fueled with that basic knowledge.
Everything it did was directed toward the papacy, educating all of Europe about the
scriptures, pointing to the papacy as the only candidate for Antichrist,
either in the past, the present, or the future.
And this evangelical and Catholics together is simply a repudiation of the
Protestant Reformation.
And this has led to all the woes that we are suffering in the United States today.
These evangelicals, I call them ecumenical evangelicals, together with the Roman
Catholic Church, have now grown to be a political religious colossus in this
country.
And they dictate policy, foreign and domestic.
They are religiously motivated.
They are supporting this new nation state of Israel in a phony re-fulfillment of
Daniel 9, verse 27, deceiving the whole world.
And we simply must comprehend this and refute it.
Dave Hunt continues, he says, The 25 page document acknowledges, without compromise,
some key differences between Catholics and evangelicals, such as the significance of
baptism and the authority of scripture.
Unfortunately, the most important difference, what it means to be a
Christian, is not mentioned.
In fact, that such a difference even exists is denied.
You see, they don't want there to be any controversy as to whether or not the Roman
Catholic Church is, in fact, a Christian Church.
That discussion is completely swept off the table by these people.
And that's the question we deal with on a daily basis here on Inquisition Update.
Is the Roman Catholic Church a Christian Church?
The evidence points clearly, no it is not.
It is the antithesis of the Christian Church.
It is the antithesis of the Kingdom of Christ.
It is the antichrist of the Bible.
But they don't mention any discussion about what it means to be a Christian.
Now, this compromise of the gospel lies at the heart of the agreement.
The key element behind this historic joint declaration is the previously unthinkable
admission on the part of leading evangelicals that active participation in
the Catholic Church makes one a Christian.
Even that is indeed, if in fact that is indeed the case, then the Protestant
Reformation was a tragic mistake.
The millions who were martyred during a thousand years before the Reformation and
since then to the present time for rejecting Roman Catholicism as a false
gospel have all died in vain, according to them.
If, however, the Protestant Reformers were right, then this new agreement between
Catholics and evangelicals could well be the cleverest and deadliest blow struck
against the gospel in the entire history of the Church.
And I would even go further, not to gainsay the author, but I would go even
further.
It is the gravest blow against the Kingdom of Christ since the Garden of Eden.
Now, either way, the consequences are staggering.
In praising the joint declaration, one leading evangelical declared,
quote, This document has the potential to recast all the ecumenical discussions that
have gone on through the years.
This is a new day.
Our closest friends as evangelicals in the cultural task, in the fundamental
theological task, are Roman Catholics.
Unquote.
The theological differences between Catholics and Protestants were once
considered to be so great that millions died as martyrs rather than compromise
them.
And their Catholic executioners were equally convicted of the importance of
such differences.
How have these differences been dissolved?
What has happened to cause leading evangelicals to declare that Catholicism's
gospel, which the reformers denounced as heretical, is now biblical?
That gospel hasn't changed.
Has conviction been compromised to create a huge coalition among conservatives for
social and political action?
That's a question we'll deal with when we come back from the break.
You're listening to Inquisition Update on FirstAmendmentRadio.com.
I know you all want answers.
And believe me, so do I.
And I'll do my best to get them.
Have you seen the Left Behind movies?
Have you read the Left Behind fictional book series?
Not everyone believes Left Behind is true prophecy.
Some may even regard as conspiratorial the mainstream re-release of the Left Behind
movie, with actor Nicolas Cage portraying the main character, as an attempt to
further reinforce, in the minds of all, this perception of false prophecy,
in order to condition the masses for the play about to begin.
Because they see the world stage shaping to fulfill what they have been led to
believe is sound biblical interpretation, a Left Behind rapture scenario,
this false view of prophecy is reinforced in the mind, not only of its adherence,
but also includes those who have been merely exposed to the specific media.
Is it possible that false prophecy can be fulfilled?
The rapture theories have always been in dispute.
Pre-trib, mid-trib, and post-trib disputes have risen up, in exclusively evangelical
circles of recent history.
So that when true believers don't suddenly disappear, this element will easily go by
the wayside, when all see a new Jewish temple begin to be built.
Will this be part of the great delusion that will come upon the whole earth?
It seems that this great prophetic delusion has already overcome practically
the entire American evangelical and Christian world.
Get the book, The Rapture Will Be Cancelled.
To learn more, visit crosstheborder.org.
That's C-R-O-S-S, crosstheborder.org.
The book of Revelation says, The Spirit of Prophecy is the testimony of Jesus Christ.
This is at the very heart of firstamendmentradio.com.
In that spirit, we have created the Prophecy Reality News app for all of your
mobile devices.
Streaming First Amendment Radio 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Available for your Apple, Android device, and smartphone.
Absolutely free.
Get the Prophecy Reality News app installed today.
So you can listen to First Amendment Radio wherever you are.
The Prophecy Reality News app.
Get it now.
Our advertising dollars come with strings that limit program content.
So without your help, these programs cannot continue on satellite, internet,
or our several affiliates.
If you benefit by the educational law programs, we ask you to give.
If you are admonished or nurtured by the Bible and ministry programs, we ask you to
give.
If some voice accosts that you are passionate about, we ask you to give.
If you believe in any of these, we ask you to support them as you would a
missionary on a continual basis.
As if giving a tithe for missionary radio.
These programs are not commercially viable and must be supported by those faithful to
the cause of truth.
Look for the button to sponsor your favorite programs at our Listen and
Schedule pages on the internet.
We will also give you unlimited archive access to all of our programs.
We are asking you to give much less than a tithe, so that you may also send support
directly to a particular program host, cause, and anywhere else the Spirit may
lead you.
Do all to the glory of our God and Creator, for His holy nation, the only
kingdom that will last forever.
Thank you for listening.
Please support today at firstamendmentradio.com
Welcome back to the second half hour of Inquisition Update on First Amendment
Radio.
If you'd like to support Inquisition Update, please support First Amendment
Radio, who sponsors the program.
Now Dave Hunt says in the previous paragraph that we read just before the
break, he says, The theological differences, the biblical differences
between Catholics and Protestants were once considered to be so great that
millions of Protestants died as martyrs, rather than to compromise with the Roman
Catholic Church.
And they're Catholic executioners.
Yes, it was Catholics who executed the saints.
She, the Roman Catholic Church, is drunk with the blood of the saints and
the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.
That's scriptural.
It says, and their Catholic executioners were equally convinced of the importance
of such differences.
In other words, they were willing to kill men, women, and children, and whole
cities, and whole nations, because the Protestants protested the Antichrist,
the Pope of Rome.
They would not bend their knee to the Pope.
They would not kiss his ring.
They would not acknowledge his temporal or his spiritual power.
He had no power.
He was Antichrist.
He was the antithesis of Christ.
He was to be shunned and renounced in the world, never to be compromised with Satan
himself.
That's Protestantism.
That's true, ancient, biblical Protestantism.
It goes all the way back to the Oriental Church, the Apostolic Church.
We have no king but Jesus.
And this man who props him up on a gold-plated chair, calling himself the
replacement of the Son of God, is nothing but Antichrist.
There was no equivocation among Evangelicals, Protestants, about who the
Antichrist was in the world.
Only the last three or four generations of quote-unquote Christians are confused
about who Antichrist is in the world.
And history records with abundant assurity who it was who killed the martyrs of
Jesus.
The papacy, the Inquisitions, the Bible confirms history.
History confirms the Bible.
She is drunk with the blood of the saints, with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.
She's drunk so deeply with Protestant blood that she's literally intoxicated
with it.
So, how could these differences be reconciled?
How could now Protestants and Catholics find any common ground?
How could there be an ecumenical reunification of the Protestant churches
back to the horror of Rome?
You can't make this stuff up.
He says, how have these differences been dissolved?
What has happened to cause leading evangelicals to declare that Catholicism's
gospel, which the Protestant Reformers denounced as heretical...
No, they didn't denounce it as heretical, they denounced it as Antichrist.
Even Dave Hunt is afraid to use the term that the Protestant Reformers used.
It wasn't just heretical, it was Antichrist.
The gospel of Roman Catholicism is you must worship and obey the Pope.
That's the very definition of Antichrist.
Now, he says, how have these differences been dissolved?
What has happened to cause leading evangelicals to declare that Catholicism's
gospel, which the Reformers denounced as heretical, is now biblical?
What gospel has changed?
Has conviction been compromised to create a huge coalition among conservatives for
social and political action?
They're trying to build a religious, a religio-political colossus.
Isn't it interesting that the book that we just concluded, R.W.
Thompson's The Footprints of the Jesuits, quotes the Popes of Rome, particularly
Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo XIII, his immediate successor, demanded that a
global, religio-political colossus be created to restore the temporal power of
the Pope around the world.
Not just in Italy, but even here in the United States and around the world.
And it says right here, he says, has conviction been compromised to create
a huge coalition among conservatives for social and political action?
What he's referring to is conservatives in both the Protestant and Evangelical
churches getting together with the conservatives of the Roman Catholic Church
to create that global, geo-political colossus.
And you must know, the purpose of it, eventually, from Rome's point of position,
is to restore the temporal and spiritual power of the Pope all over the world.
To undo the Protestant Reformation.
To destroy the Protestant Reformation.
And to restore to the Pope the power and influence that he had, the universal power
and influence that he had all over the world prior to the Protestant Reformation.
To return to the Dark Ages.
To return to the Middle Ages.
To return to the Old World Order.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the New World Order.
He says, Evangelicals would decry the complacent attitude that everyone actively
involved in a Protestant church is a Christian.
How then did Evangelical leaders consent to the view that all active Catholics are
Christians and not to be evangelized?
I mean, doesn't the Bible clearly say in Revelation 18, verses 4 and 5,
Come out of her, my people.
Speaking of the Roman Catholic Church, come out of her, my people.
Come out of the Roman Catholic Church, my people.
So why do Evangelicals accept the idea that they shouldn't try to proselytize
Roman Catholics to come out of her?
Clearly, this is not a move of God, this ecumenical movement.
He says, the document explains that both Catholics and Evangelicals endorsed the
Apostles' Creed.
That Christ, quote, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was
buried.
Unquote.
That creed, however, like the Nicene and other creeds, does not express the gospel
that saves.
Romans chapter 1, verse 16, that Christ died for our sins, 1 Corinthians 15,
verses 1-4.
And it says, Mormons affirm the Apostles' Creed, but they aren't biblical
Christians.
Well, look, the same should be said of the Roman Catholic Church.
They ascribe to the Apostles' Creed, which they created, but they are not
biblical Christians.
They are anti-Christians.
He says, nor does embracing the creed make Catholics or Protestants Christians.
That's absolutely correct.
It's the faith in the atoning blood of Jesus Christ that makes Christians,
Christians.
No apostolic creed, written and defined by the Roman Catholic Church, has anything to
do with a man's salvation.
And I am reviled by people who call themselves Christians because I will not,
quote, I will not take that creed, I will not repeat that creed in the
churches.
Never understanding.
They never understand what that creed, that Apostles' Creed, represents.
It finds a common creed that both Catholics and Protestants can take
together, and thus dissolve the line of distinction between the kingdom of Christ
and the kingdom of anti-Christ.
And I simply will not participate in it.
Again, he says, nor does embracing the creed, the Apostles' Creed, make Catholics
or Protestants Christians.
Furthermore, what Catholics mean by Christ dying for their sins is entirely different
from an evangelical understanding of this truth, as we shall see in later pages.
Whereas Roman Catholicism was once the official state religion, and the practice
of all others was prohibited throughout Latin America and most of Europe,
that is no longer the case.
Therefore, Rome uses other strategies.
In some countries, like S.
France, the Catholic Church is pressuring the government to make it illegal to
proselytize.
Exactly what the endorsers of this joint pact have agreed upon.
To make it a matter of law, a matter of civil law, that Bible-believing
Protestants cannot preach their own religion and make proselytes to the gospel
of Jesus Christ.
Is that not anti-Christ?
He says, in other places, the Catholic Church is demanding that evangelicals sign
an agreement similar to the one just signed here in the United States.
A recent news report declared, quote, stunned by the staggering growth of
evangelical sects, quote-unquote sects, S.E.C.T.S.
in Brazil, leaders of the Roman Catholic Church have threatened to launch a,
quote-unquote, Holy War, so typical of the Roman Catholic Church, launching a holy
war against Protestants unless they stop leading people from the Catholic fold.
At the 31st National Conference of the Bishops of Brazil, Bishop Zinizio Bon
called evangelicals a serious threat to the Vatican's influence in the country.
Listen, Protestants were a serious threat to the Vatican's influence in Europe at
the time of the Protestant Reformation.
And Protestantism, if it holds to its Protestant faith, will always be a threat
to Antichrist.
And we should never repent of being a threat to error.
He quotes further, he says, we will declare a holy war.
Don't doubt it, he announced.
Continuing, he says, the Catholic Church has a preponderous structure, but when we
move, we'll smash anyone beneath us, unquote.
Sounds like typical Rome, doesn't it?
She's never changed one bit.
And it says, according to Bon, an all-out holy war cannot be avoided
unless the 13 largest Protestant churches and denominations sign a treaty that would
require Protestants to stop all evangelism efforts in Brazil.
In exchange, he said, Catholics would agree to stop all persecution directed
toward Protestants.
In other words, they never promised that they wouldn't proselytize Protestants into
the Roman Catholic Church.
They would only stop killing Protestants.
Is that Christianity?
Is that a Christian church?
Is that language that you would expect to come from the one holy Roman Catholic and
Apostolic Church that Jesus Christ founded under the Apostle Peter?
That's not a Christian church at all.
He says, the Bishop admits that persecution of Protestants is still
official policy.
The extent of that persecution throughout history, which we will document,
says the author, would greatly surprise both Catholics and Protestants.
It is important to note that the concern at the Bishop's conference was not the
truth of the gospel or the salvation of souls, but maintaining the influence of
the Vatican and keeping people in the Catholic Church.
That sums it up right there.
That's what Rome's always been about.
Not about the gospel, not about saving souls, but maintaining the influence and
power and control of the Vatican and to keeping people within the Roman Catholic
fold.
Note, too, that the very treaty which Bishop Bond demands under threat in Brazil
has been granted in the United States by Chuck Colson, J.I.
Packer, Bill Bright, and Pat Robertson et al.
That Bond's threats influenced American evangelical leaders is evident from
Colson's statement in an interview that he and other signatories to the document had
become, quote, distressed by clashes arising from the growth of evangelical
Protestantism in traditionally Catholic Latin America, unquote.
You have to ask yourself, who are Pat Robertson, Chuck Colson, J.I.
Packer, Bill Bright, who are they working for?
They are obviously working for Rome, apologizing for the Protestant
Reformation.
They're not Protestants.
They're wolves in sheep's clothing, leading God's people down the primrose
path to perdition in the Roman Catholic Church.
He says, while evangelicals sign a truce, Rome is stepping up its evangelization of
Protestants into the Catholic Church.
Rome's Evangelization 2000 has six evangelism training conferences scheduled
just for 1994 across America involving such groups as Paulist Evangelization
Training Institutes.
Do you recognize any of these names?
In Washington, D.C.
during the June 26-30 and July 24-28, and also the Association of Coordinators
of Catholic Schools of Evangelization.
Theirs was held during August 3-6, also in Washington, D.C.
These are serious training sessions for leaders in what they specify as Catholic
Evangelism.
Chuck Colson was a featured speaker at the John Paul II and the New Evangelization
Implementing the Vision Conference in Ypsilanti, Michigan, held during May
11-14.
He shared the podium with Catholic leaders such as Fr.
Tom Forrest, who heads Evangelization 2000 out of the Vatican.
Real chummy Chuck Colson is with the Vatican.
He wants to be Catholic and he wants to make you Catholic too.
And if you won't become Catholic with Chuck Colson, he'll make the Roman
Catholic Church so powerful in the country that the Roman Catholic Church can swallow
up your church.
He says, the Evangelical leaders who signed the Joint Declaration apparently
imagined a spiritual partnership with Catholics to win the world to Christ.
Who is their Christ?
The Pope!
Not Jesus Christ.
They crucify Him every day in the Mass in the Roman Catholic Church, making a
mockery of His one-time all-sufficient sacrifice, a very, very bloody sacrifice
at the hands of Roman soldiers, and they want to unite the world and win
the world for Christ.
That is the Pope, the Antichrist.
He says, for Catholics, however, it means bringing people into the Roman
Catholic Church, something which the Joint Agreement neglected to state.
Evangelicals can't proselytize Catholics to make them Evangelicals, but Rome never
promised anybody that she wouldn't evangelize Protestants to become
Catholics.
He says, consider the following explanation of Catholic evangelism by
Father Tom Forrest to a group of Catholic Charismatics.
Catholic Charismatics.
Quote, our job is to make people as richly and as fully Christian as we can make them
by bringing them into the Catholic Church.
So evangelization is never fully successful.
It's only partial until the convert is made a member of Christ's body being led
into the Catholic Church.
Now listen again to the words of Pope Paul VI.
Now this is a document every one of you should have in your homes called On
Evangelization in the Modern World.
This is what the Pope says.
Quote, the commitment of someone newly evangelized cannot remain abstract.
Oh, I'm a Christian.
Now that's too abstract.
It must be given concrete and visible form through entry into the Catholic Church,
our visible sacrament of salvation.
Do you understand what he's saying here?
You've got to bring them into the Roman Catholic Church and they have to practice
the Mass.
They have to take the Jesus cookie like all quote-unquote true Christians,
to eat and drink damnation to themselves, to crucify Christ afresh.
He continues, he says, I like saying those words.
I'm going to say them again.
Quote, our visible sacrament of salvation.
Unquote.
That's what the Church is.
And if that is what the Church is, we have to be evangelizing into the
Church.
No, you don't just invite someone to become a Christian.
You invite them to become Catholics.
Why would this be so important?
First of all, there are seven sacraments and the Catholic Church has all seven.
On our altars, we have the body of Christ.
We drink the blood of Christ.
Jesus is alive on our altars as offering.
We become one with Christ in the Eucharist.
As Catholics, we have Mary.
And that mom of ours, Queen of Paradise, is praying for us till she sees us in
glory.
As Catholics, we have the papacy.
A history of popes from Peter to John Paul II.
We have the rock upon which Christ did build his Church.
As Catholics, now I love this one, he says, we have purgatory.
Thank God.
I'm one of those who would never get to the beatific vision without it.
It's the only way to go.
So as Catholics, our job is to use this remaining decade evangelizing everyone we
can into the Catholic Church.
Into the body of Christ and into the third millennium of Catholic history.
You see what their idea of being a Christian is?
To be Catholic.
Did you hear any equivocation or any compromise at all with evangelicals?
With Protestantism?
There is none.
And don't expect for there ever to be any.
No matter what you've been told about Vatican Council II.
It followed perfectly the sentiments just expressed in that quote.
Results in the purgation of true Bible Protestants from this country and around
the world.
There's no compromise in the Roman Catholic Church.
You're either Roman Catholic or you're toast.
They may call us separated brethren now.
But once they have fully divided and separated the wheat from the tares in the
Protestant churches.
The gates are going to be closed against those who will not enter.
And we are going to be persecuted like no one has ever seen in the history of the
world.
Dave Hunt continues, he says.
Yet in spite of such clear explanations of Roman Catholic quote on quote evangelism.
Evangelicals are participating with Catholics in joint evangelistic efforts.
For the Catholic salvation does not come through personally receiving Christ as
Savior.
But is a lengthy process that begins with baptism.
And thereafter depends upon one's continued relationship to the church.
To the Roman Catholic Church.
Salvation comes through participation in the Roman Catholic sacraments.
Seven of them.
Penance, good works, suffering for one's sins and the sins of others.
Here and or in purgatory.
Indulgences to reduce time in purgatory.
And almost endless masses and rosaries said on one's behalf even after one's
death.
Catholic evangelism is by works the very antithesis of the gospel of the grace of
God.
See Acts chapter 20 verse 24.
I repeat, Roman Catholicism is anti-Christianity.
We will have no peace or unity with the Antichrist Church of Rome or its Pope.
I'll see you tomorrow on Imposition Update.
Before that, corporate advertising dollars come with strings that limit program
content.
So without your help, these programs cannot continue on satellite internet or
our several affiliates.
If you benefit by the educational law programs, we ask you to give.
If you are admonished or nurtured by the Bible and ministry programs, we ask you to
give.
If some voice a cause that you are passionate about, we ask you to give.
If you believe in any of these, we ask you to support them as you would a
missionary on a continual basis.
As if giving a tithe for missionary radio.
These programs are not commercially viable and must be supported by those faithful to
the cause of truth.
Look for the button to sponsor your favorite programs at our listen and
schedule pages on the internet.
We will also give you unlimited archive access to all of our programs.
We are asking you to give much less than a tithe so that you may also send support
directly to a particular program host, cause, and anywhere else the Spirit may
lead you.
Do all to the glory of our God and Creator for His holy nation, the only kingdom that
will last forever.
Thank you for listening.
Visit crosstheborder.org, C-R-O-S-S, crosstheborder.org, to get your print,
e-pub, or PDF version of Nicholas Arthur's new book titled, When the Third Temple is
Built.
That's crosstheborder.org.
When it comes to prophecy today, much of the Evangelical Christian world
has their eyes on Israel, waiting and watching to see when the Third Temple will
begin to be built.
The plans are drawn.
The Jewish people are eager.
Most Evangelical Christians today believe that the rapture will happen before the
Third Temple is built.
Hi, I'm Michael Eugene.
I was taught that Daniel's 70th week was in the future.
Is that really what the Bible teaches?
Have we searched the scriptures and found this to be true?
Why is it so important for a re-established Israel to build a Third
Temple in Jerusalem?
Is it necessary to build a Temple on the same location already occupied by the Dome
of the Rock?
Is it necessary for sacrifices to take place in the Temple on Temple Mount?
Is there really a rapture followed by seven years of tribulation?
What is the New Testament Temple?
Can we identify history and prophecy?
Who is the first beast in Revelation Chapter 13?
Who are the seven kings in Revelation 17?
I have asked all these questions and I have found Nicholas Arthur's new book,
When the Third Temple is Built, answers all these questions and more using
scripture to interpret scripture.
The Bible says that no prophecy of scripture is of any private
interpretation.
Nicholas shows us in his new book, When the Third Temple is Built,
how the Bible interprets prophecy and not man's private interpretation.
Visit crosstheborder.org, c-r-o-s-s, crosstheborder.org, to get your print,
e-pub, or pdf version of Nicholas Arthur's new book titled, When the Third Temple is
Built.
That's crosstheborder.org.