I want
to tell the world community that while we will always put America's interests first,
we will deal fairly with everyone.
With everyone.
All people and all other nations.
We will seek common ground, not hostility.
Partnership, not conflict.
The vision and future planning of the United States and the restructuring of the
globe into a new world order is not limited to any particular US president,
since globalism is a goal that may span 25 years plus.
The maximum two-term limit of a US president is about eight years.
This is the reason why there are men in the shadows who steer national and foreign
policy in a certain direction.
The globalists work through groups such as the Bilderberg Group, the Council on
Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, and the Vatican, which has insinuated
itself as the new world order religion, but encompassing all religion through
interfaith.
These groups and organisations have built a framework that US presidents must work
within, or risk being assassinated.
The chilling infiltration of both American and European institutions is widespread.
The Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, Knights Columbus, Freemasonry,
and Skull and Bones, which are secretly subservient to the Vatican and controlled
by the Jesuit order.
This is why you see George Bush making the Skull and Bones sign while receiving
communion.
One can also discern the level of papal involvement by the behaviour of John
Kerry.
Donald Trump, like his predecessors, must work within the system, including
working towards globalist ambitions, such as the Club of Rome's plan to divide
the world into 10 manageable regions, with the Pope as the supreme ruler.
We only have to be reminded of what happened to JFK, who rebuffed globalists,
intelligent agencies, secret societies, and the Roman Catholic Church,
even though he was a Catholic.
JFK did many things contrary to the objectives of the Deep State and the
Vatican.
He wanted to de-escalate involvement in Vietnam, dismantle the Federal Reserve,
stated he wanted to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces, and to his detriment made
a speech that greatly displeased the Vatican about the subject of separation
between church and state.
JFK was essentially a new world order non-conformist who had to be eliminated.
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are, as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies,
to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of
pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by
imitating its arbitrary restrictions.
Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our
traditions do not survive with it.
And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will
be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment.
That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control.
The event surrounding the assassination of Abraham Lincoln was another event that has
been whitewashed by historians and academics.
The irrefutable connection to the Jesuit order of the Vatican has been buried under
a mountain of frivolous information.
Statements from Lincoln himself have been omitted that tell of his anxiety towards
an unseen battle with the Pope.
Charles Quiniquy, a close friend of President Lincoln, was a disillusioned
Catholic priest who had left the Catholic Church and become a Presbyterian minister.
He confirmed that the Vatican was behind the Confederate cause, the death of
President Lincoln, and that Lincoln's assassins were faithful Roman Catholics
ultimately serving Pope Pius IX.
The Vatican assassin was John Wilkes Booth, aided and abetted by other staunch
Catholics.
Mary Surratt, Lewis Powell, George Asteros, David Herold, and John Surratt,
who were coached by Jesuit priests.
At the time of the trial and hanging, the US government decided to hide the
Vatican conspiracy from the public in case of a public backlash against Catholics
from an overwhelming Protestant majority.
A psychologist stated in theatlantic.com that Donald Trump has personality traits
of narcissism, disagreeableness, and grandiosity.
These personality traits seem undesirable.
In many respects, it is a safeguard from the tyranny of the establishment and the
men in the shadows.
If you look at those removed from power, like Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi,
as well as leaders whom the US wants to remove, like Assad and Putin, they all
have one thing in common.
They are independent thinkers, not willing to be a sock puppet for
globalists, unlike Hillary Clinton.
Donald Trump would be more likely to do things his own way rather than heed the
counsel of advisors of think-tank groups in the Jesuit order.
Obama was surrounded by Jesuit-trained advisors because he, like Bush,
Clinton, and so many other presidents, are not the real power behind the
political throne.
However, Trump, like Kennedy, is reliant on the Secret Service to protect him,
aircraft mechanics to make sure his plane does not crash, and master chefs to make
sure his food is not tainted.
Trump will have to make concessions or risk being assassinated.
I have nothing to do with Putin.
I've never spoken to him.
I don't know anything about him other than he will respect me.
I don't think Putin has any respect whatsoever for Clinton.
I think he does respect me.
And I hope I get along great with him.
It's possible that we won't, Jeremy.
I hope that we get along great with Putin, because it would be great to have Russia
with a good relationship.
Right now we don't have a good relationship.
The purpose of that infiltration was... what for?
Well, the purpose is what the Roman Catholic system has all the time as as her
own purpose, is to infiltrate, to penetrate all the areas of life where
the Roman Catholic can have control and access for the coming world government.
What that means is, in preparation for that world government, the Roman Catholic
institution, especially since the establishment of the Jesuit order in 1541,
throughout all these 500 years, they've been in preparation, and through
infiltration and penetration of every level of society, in order to take over
the world politically and religiously.
There are two doctrines that define very well this dangerous goal of the Roman
Catholic institution.
Two doctrines define this very well.
One is called the doctrine of the apostolic succession, and that is dealing
with the papacy.
And the other is the doctrine, the temporal power, and that is dealing
with world government.
The founders of the CIA, which replaced the OSS, Office of Strategic Services,
were Alan Dulles, a Knight of Malta, Harry Truman, a Freemason, and William J.
Donovan, who was also a Knight of Malta.
Every director of the CIA has had some connection to the Jesuit order,
through either a secret society, a Jesuit priest, or a Jesuit education.
The CIA vet potential US presidents, often grooming candidates or sabotaging
them, like the Trump hot mic incident.
Here it was apparent that Billy Bush egged Trump on while recording him.
Billy Bush is a member of the Bush dynasty.
The Bush family are deeply involved with the CIA, the Vatican, and Skull and Bones,
a secret society that makes their initiates carry out immoral acts or
confess sordid details of their lives.
These initiates can then be controlled or blackmailed if they start to think
independently outside the order.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom is controlled in a similar way.
Both the House of Lords and the House of Commons are mostly controlled by MI5 or
MI6 through blackmailing or destroying individuals with recordings, such as
videotapes of politicians engaging in bad behavior, such as soliciting prostitutes,
and even pedophilia parties.
That is the secret of how politicians are controlled or destroyed by intelligence
agencies.
Since 9-11, the only director of the CIA who has not been Jesuit trained was
Michael Morrell, who is a member of Skull and Bones, society controlled by the
Jesuit order.
James Clapper, staunch Roman Catholic, is Director of National Intelligence,
a position that makes him an advisor to the President and generally an overseer of
all intelligence agencies.
The Vatican now controls intelligence agencies, which gives the Jesuits a carte
blanche to carry out operations not only in secret, but at the expense of the
everyday American text.
Jesuits of the past?
Are you familiar with the Jesuit Oath, its devious plans to control the wealth of
the nations, enslave the masses, and depopulate the world?
Pope Francis is a Jesuit.
Should we be alarmed that the institution the pope heads also controls the CIA?
The CIA's mission is to identify and destroy terrorists and fundamentalists.
Pope Francis likewise, and defines them as those who believe in absolute truth,
end-time prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation, refuse to yield their liberty
of conscience, and give up constitutional rights.
The insidious agenda of the Jesuits will soon be realized as Pope Francis has been
hailed Lord of the World and Savior of the Earth.
What does CIA stand for?
The Central Intelligent Agency.
That is correct.
That is what the CIA stands for.
Now, do you know what the primary job of the CIA is?
I think their primary job would be similar to the police force, but more the central,
the head of the law enforcement.
Now, Marianne, what is the primary job of the CIA?
I believe it has to do with foreign intelligence.
The CIA is the foreign spying agency for America.
That is also correct.
Now, they collect, analyze, evaluate, and disseminate foreign intelligence in
order to help make decisions that relate to national security.
So you're right.
So, Jerome, can you guess what religious group has predominantly run the CIA?
I would assume Christians or Catholics.
Now, can you guess what religious group has predominantly run the CIA?
I'm going to assume or guess the Catholic religion.
That is correct.
Why do you guess that?
Because I figured that they might have a lot of involvement with the CIA.
Now, the CIA has been predominantly run by Roman Catholics and a high percentage of
them have been members of the Jesuit society.
So, do you know who Jesuits are, Marianne?
Kind of, yes.
I was raised Catholic, so I'm familiar with Jesuits.
Okay.
And what can you tell me about Jesuits?
Well, they seem to be more liberal priests, I guess.
All right.
So, they are a male congregation in the Roman Catholic Church, as you know.
And so, what we're going to do is just read the Jesuit oath, okay?
So, I'm going to have you follow along.
It says,
When opportunity present, make and wage relentless war secretly or openly against
all heretics.
Rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women in order to annihilate forever their
terrible race.
So, Lucas, what are your thoughts on the Jesuit oath?
Well, based on that oath, I'm not too fond of the group.
I haven't really looked into what else they claim to stand for, but it's kind of
concerning to have a group, like you said, so involved in central intelligence and
everything and being so unmotivated by these values.
So, what are your thoughts on the Jesuit oath?
The Jesuits are pretty bad people.
Sounds like they want to kill people.
That's not a good thing, is it?
Based on the Jesuit oath, the excerpt that we just read, what are your thoughts on
Pope Francis being so impactful in social and political issues?
I think that we should keep our separation of state and church.
I believe the Pope should stick to his religious issues and then the government
needs to handle the government issues.
So, now, based on the Jesuit oath, because Pope Francis is a Jesuit,
right?
How do you feel about Pope Francis being so impactful in political and social
issues?
I feel that's a sign of prophecy.
So, I'm not surprised.
The Catholic religion is of a universal religion, trying to get everyone in the
world to follow their same creed.
So, that doesn't surprise me.
Wow, Sean.
I was going to ask you now, are you aware that the Bible tells us there is a time
coming when our liberty of conscience will be stripped away and that those who stand
true to the principles of Protestantism will not be able to buy and sell?
Yes.
Revelation.
The Catholic Herald, which is a news publication for the Roman Catholic Church,
gives us a new and interesting way to look at the CIA or the Central Intelligence
Agency.
By professing right in the very front page of this Catholic Herald News, it states
that the Catholic Church thrives in the CIA.
The headlines read, Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA.
The agency has been dubbed, and I quote, Catholics in Action, end quote.
Because the faithful have occupied so many senior positions.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is a plain easy giveaway and it should not take a
rocket scientist or anyone with great qualifications to understand that the
Roman Jesuits, or should I say, the Vatican, is the one that runs the
Central Intelligence Agency.
Make some very interesting notes here.
Make note that the CIA thrives in the United States of America.
It has the seal of the United States and the symbol of the United States right on
it.
The eagle is right there.
Secondly, make note the Jesuit order thrives primarily at the Vatican.
However, what you need to understand is that the Jesuit order is a secret police
for the Vatican and what they have done is they have successfully infiltrated every
other governmental structure in the world today.
But they will disguise themselves as Roman Catholics and that is because they are
Roman Catholics.
Just as you have Joe Biden, he is the first Roman Catholic vice president of the
United States of America.
While he is the very first vice president who is Roman Catholic, we also have the
very first Jesuit Roman Catholic leader, the Pope, Pope Francis.
In case you missed it, let me go back and repeat myself again so you will understand
exactly what I am telling you.
These Jesuits, though they infiltrate other governmental structures,
they simply will never tell you that they are Jesuits, but they will tell you that
they are simply Roman Catholics.
Their allegiance belongs to the Pope.
These so-called Roman Catholics, they are Jesuits, especially the ones who
are in political structures or in judicial positions of power.
The United States of America is run by Jesuits.
They use the order of the Freemasons as scapegoats.
The majority of people, the minute they hear the words Freemason, they
automatically think the most evil secret society.
But when they hear Jesuits, they think, oh Pope Francis is a Jesuit.
He is a good person.
He is a Roman Catholic.
I think the Jesuits are connected to the Roman Catholics.
They have hospitals and schools and many other good institutions, so they're not
that bad.
But that's how they operate.
They operate in a very subtle way.
The evidence for this is that we see a reflection between America and the
Vatican.
The United States capital is designed to resemble the Vatican.
The obelisk in the United States of America also is a direct reflection of the
obelisk of Rome and the Vatican.
The symbols of sun worship within the Freemasons and within the Jesuit order,
it's all the exact same.
Going back to the CIA, when we look at the symbol of the CIA, the United States
seal...
All the attention placed on the NSA's mass surveillance of American citizens,
it's easy to forget the other countries that are taking a page out of the agency's
spy book.
Just this past weekend, it was revealed that in 2008, Australia's surveillance
agency shared information about the country's citizens with its most trusted
intelligence partners.
Perhaps the most concerning part of this recently leaked Snowden document was the
discussion between these allies over whether or not to share the medical,
legal, and religious information of Australian citizens.
But this story is just a microcosm of the larger international spying cabal working
together to peer into every nook and cranny of the world.
So who exactly are these partners?
Well, they call themselves the Five Eyes, a partnership made up of intelligence
agencies in five English-speaking countries.
The US, the UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
Just like the Eye of Sauron, the Eye of Seahole, which is an especially
appropriate analogy since the Lord of the Rings was filmed in New Zealand.
But I digress.
You see, the Five Eyes agreement has been around since the end of World War II,
but it was so secret that the program wasn't even disclosed to the public until
2005.
On the surface, this treaty is just a friendly agreement between allied nations
that it's essential to stopping global terrorism.
But thanks to the Snowden leaks, we now know just what an asinine agreement
it's actually being used for.
Industrial espionage and circumventing those pesky laws that prohibit warrantless
surveillance of a country's own citizens.
In theory, these nations are not allowed to spy on each other's people,
but we all know rules are meant to be broken.
In 2007, the NSA analyzed and retained any British citizen's mobile phone number,
email, and IP address swept up in its enormous dragnet.
Another memo dated from 2005 shows that the NSA was working on a procedure to spy
on the other four countries.
And while one sentence in the memo states that the US and UK will not explicitly
target each other, the very next sentence says governments reserve the right to spy
on each other's citizens when it's in the best interest of each nation.
That's not open to interpretation at all.
Look, I think it's clear at this point that the myth of the American empire
exporting freedom and democracy really means exporting surveillance and
subjugation.
Guys, there's a lot going on in the world, a lot that you might disagree with.
As much as we protest and complain to our elected representatives, it doesn't seem
to shape the actual legislation put into action.
Foreign policy is supposed to be drafted between the president and congress,
but that would be too easy, be too democratic.
So instead, legislation is now outsourced.
Policy prescriptions are made by think tanks and NGOs like the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Atlantic Council, and the Trilateral Commission.
The idea of having academics researching world issues, pairing with world
journalists, to help keep our elected officials informed sounds like a good
idea, right?
Sure, but what happens when policy recommendations are being made by the
councils and think tanks whose board members are the CEOs of some of the
biggest corporations in the world?
Is it a conflict of interest that many of these councils are run by executives from
almost every major industry, from food to media, and most shockingly, national
defense?
Let's take a look at just some of the few.
The Council on Foreign Relations, their mission statement is in part
sponsoring independent task forces that produce reports with both findings and
policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics.
The question I ask is, what sort of policy prescriptions can we expect from a board
of directors that includes Madeleine Albright and Colin Powell, both of whom
served as U.S.
Secretary of State, and Tom Brokaw and Fareed Zakaria, both two well-known
establishment journalists.
So, these folks aren't even in government anymore, yet they sit on the board of one
of the most influential think tanks in the world.
Now, if you doubt the CFR's influence, just take a listen of a clip of Hillary
Clinton's first visit as Secretary of State to the CFR headquarters right here
in Washington, D.C.
We get a lot of advice from the council, so this will mean I won't have this far to
go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.
What we should be doing and how we should think about the future?
Gee, Hillary, you're really letting the cat out of the bag there.
Now, you may be wondering why you don't hear about these groups' influence from
the corporate media.
As I mentioned before, extremely powerful and influential media moguls sit on these
boards.
They are part of the establishment, and the CFR is only one of these groups.
What about the Atlantic Council?
According to the Atlantic Council's website, part of their focus is on
drafting roadmaps for U.S.
policy toward the Balkans, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, and Libya.
Now, this is especially interesting because membership of the Atlantic Council
includes some of the top defense corporations in the country.
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon.
So why are the top defense corporations in the world advising our lawmakers on
foreign policy?
As we know, the revolving door between government and corporations never stops
spinning.
The Bilderberg Group can be summed up in their goals and aspirations by looking at
the founders.
Joseph Rettinger, who once studied to be a Catholic priest in a Jesuit seminary,
was concerned about the anti-Americanism in Western Europe.
He approached Prince Berhard of the Netherlands, who then in turn contacted
Paul van Zeeland of the Catholic Party of Belgium.
Prince Berhard contacted Walter Biddle Smith, director of the CIA, and
facilitated a guest list through Eisenhower's advisor Charles Douglas
Jackson, who was an expert in psychological warfare and director of the
defunct OSS, the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA.
So the Bilderberg Group founders consisted of royalty, intelligence service
directors, a member of the Roman Catholic political party, and the influences of the
Jesuit order noviate Joseph Rettinger.
Enough said.
Secretive and elite, the Bilderberg Group unites the world's most powerful people
behind closed doors.
It's been happening for decades.
Some even believe it's a venue where the world's most rich and powerful conspire to
carve out a new world order.
RT correspondent Abby Martin was in Chantilly, Virginia today to let us know
what's happening outside of the Bilderberg conference and joins us now to tell us all
about it.
Abby, nice to see you.
So we have a lot of powerful people all in one room, happens all the time.
So what's all the fuss about?
Yeah, egregious violation of federal law.
There's an act called the Logan Act, which says that you cannot meet with
foreign diplomats without congressional oversight.
And I think that that's really the main key here is people are like, hold on,
why are there 130 of the most powerful world players in banking, mining,
oil, food, media, defense and politics?
Why are they all getting together and meeting in secrecy behind closed doors
without any congressional oversight or really any awareness of what it is they're
talking about?
Breaking news tonight, the Pope in America, a rousing welcome for the man
who's been called the rock star Pope, rock star Pope, Francis begins a historic
visit.
It's the Pope, the two leaders will speak to the world, then hold a one on one
meeting with only translators in the room.
All before Pope Francis addresses Congress Thursday with Biden in attendance.
Even though the president and the Pope are allies on issues ranging from climate
change to income inequality to Cuba, even the Iran nuclear deal, the White
House refuses to reveal what the two men will discuss.
The White House refuses to reveal what the two men will discuss.
For the faithful who'd been waiting for hours, the emergence of Pope Francis
shortly before 9 a.m.
was the thrill of a lifetime.
Thousands, led by the president and Mrs. Obama, waited to greet him.
And after the official welcoming ceremony, both leaders address the significance of
the visit.
And I believe the excitement around your visit, Holy Father, must be attributed not
only to your role as Pope.
30 seconds left, anything else?
Yes, I would like to just end with this note.
As far as all the things that have happened while the Pope has been visiting
here, the thing that bothered me the most is when he said Christ failed on the
cross.
And I did a report earlier in the day, people can go look at why I referenced
certain scriptures, but Christ didn't fail on the cross.
He knew he was going to die on the cross and he said, I'm giving myself willingly.
So I was very disturbed to hear something like that.
He said that?
I didn't know that.
That was Christ's ultimate triumph.
Yeah.
And he said he failed on the cross.
As ABC News, I'm sure it's on multiple other news outlets as well.
Sounds like something the devil would say, Jacari.
And if at times our efforts and works seem to fail and not produce fruit,
we need to remember that we are followers of Jesus Christ.
And his life, humanly speaking, ended in failure, the failure of the
cross.
For that, you can see the Pope greeting members.
And as he entered the hall as well, greeting many who were there to see him.
Papa Francesco, on behalf of this very distinguished group, representatives of
the Hindu, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, Native American, Jewish, Islamic,
and Christian communities of New York City.
Yes.
You say to them, look, I have to have the Sabbath off, which may I just confess that
I learned in my first meeting with Devon.
All these years, I thought the Sabbath was Sunday.
I've been going to church.
We say worship on the Sabbath, worship on the Sabbath in the Baptist
Church.
And you corrected me.
You said, no, Sunday is the first day of the week.
Sabbath is Friday, sundown to Saturday, Sunday.
That's right.
I stand corrected.
That's because Sunday is a day of worship.
You're supposed to be in a Christian church.
But wait a second.
Aren't we supposed to have religion, religious freedom in America?
Some religions worship on different days.
Because blue laws, which date back to colonial times, still ban that.
And it doesn't state.
Originally, they outlawed regular Sunday work.
No buying, no selling, traveling, public entertainment, or sports even.
It's baked in, have always had this temptation to let work crowd out all the
other things that matter.
Family, faith.
And they have to be told again and again, knock it off, don't work.
It's interesting.
You think people are lazy, but they work too much.
Americans work too much.
Maybe, but they should certainly be able to choose their own days off.
The idea that somehow a bunch of guys in a state capitol somewhere know what's best
for us in terms of, you know, how many days off we take and when we take them.
Everyone listen to the Pope speak on the importance of keeping Sunday as the
Sabbath.
We are called to reflect more deeply on the mystery of creation.
And therefore, of our own lives, we are called to rest.
Especially those in situations of greater vulnerability or risk.
Legislative activity is always best to take care of supportive people.
To this, you have been invited, called, and convinced by those who elect
you.
Yours is a work which makes me reflect in two ways on the figure of Moses.
On the one hand, the patriarch and lawgiver of the people of Israel
symbolizes the need of people to keep alive their sense of unity by means of
just legislation.
Our particular campaign in the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work is
about psychosocial risks and stress in the workplace.
And the reason we decided on that topic is because our board is tripartite,
governments, unions and employers.
I think the evidence we have in terms of looking at long hours is that it's not so
much which day of the week you are working for us, it's a question that every worker
has to get adequate rest.
Now, there are other cultural issues around the Saturday and Sunday working.
And in particular, for the Sunday working, I think it's interesting what the recent
Eurofound survey has to say about this.
There's an increasing number of people having to work on Sundays, an increasing
number of people saying that it is impacting on their family lives.
From the occupational safety and health point of view, we're very keen that
workers get adequate rest.
But I think if you look at that European working conditions survey from Eurofound,
you will see that that Sunday working is definitely impacting as well on family
life.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of
the beast or the number of his name.
Stocks up on supplies at the supermarket.
But Karin, like most people here in Sweden, won't be paying with cash when she
gets to the checkout.
I personally never use cash.
As you see here, I'm shopping.
I use my scanner.
When I check out, I'll use my credit card.
And my banking, I do on my iPhone.
So that's it.
I don't need any cash.
He is now joining the war on cash.
We've seen that from the ECB.
And they're saying, oh, we should get rid of the 500 euro note.
In the UK, we're seeing the former chief executive of Standard Chartered.
He's saying that we should get rid of the 50 pound note.
So there's a war on cash going on.
They're saying it's because they want to stop terrorism.
They're saying because they want to stop money laundering.
But as we've seen over and over, the banks are the ones that are involved
in that anyway.
Popular culture proclaims the RFID chip is the mark of the beast.
However, let us first ponder the scripture.
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a
mark in their right hand or in their foreheads, and that no man might buy or
sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of
his name.
Before we investigate what the mark of the beast is, we must first discover how the
no buy and sell will be administered.
And only a cashless society can achieve that.
The greatest misconceptions are spread by repeating the opinions of others.
Let us go straight to the source, the Bible, and learn the clear and
distinct definition of what exactly is the mark of the beast.
A beast in Bible prophecy is a kingdom as explained in the following verse,
Daniel 7 23.
Thus he said, the fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon the earth.
Now the mark which belongs to the papacy is the professed holy day of mainstream
Christianity.
Sunday is our mark of authority.
The church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath
observance is proof of that fact.
Catholic Record of London, Ontario, September the 1st, 1923.
Protestants accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship
after the Catholic Church made the change.
But the Protestant mind does not seem to realize that in observing Sunday they are
accepting the authority of the spokesman for the church, the Pope.
Our Sunday visitor, February the 5th, 1950.
Sunday keeping went mainstream as a day of worship and rest in 321 AD when Emperor
Constantine decreed it under the influence of his flatterer Bishop Eusebius.
The divinely appointed Sabbath, Saturday, was moved to Sunday,
Deus Solis.
And those true Christians who disobeyed the Sunday apostasy were penalized and
persecuted.
Bishop Eusebius was the hidden hand in this religio-political decree as Emperor
Constantine realized the religio-political benefits uniting pagans and Christians
within the Roman Empire.
Bishop Eusebius was part of an apostate Christian movement that evolved into the
Roman Catholic Church.
His Sunday keeping had been preeminent among apostate Christians around 70 years
before Emperor Constantine's decree.
The fourth commandment, Exodus 28, remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy,
has never been changed under any biblical or apostolic instruction.
Jesus, the disciples, and all the early churches mentioned in the Bible,
for example Corinthia, Thessalonica, Galatia, and churches in Rome,
kept the Sabbath Saturday.
The Pope's title Vicarius Filii Dei, vicar or representative of the Son of God,
adds up to 666 in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew.
Vicarius or vicar is derived from the word substitute as the Pope assumes the title
substitute of Christ on earth.
Therefore Mark of the Beast 666 is a prophecy that every nation will enforce a
Sunday law by fine, economic sanctions, and finally the death penalty.
The United States or Vatican alliance can achieve this goal through controlling the
global financial systems of the world, implementing sanctions or withholding
global currency or access to the swift international payment system.
The Mark of the Beast is an invisible mark and like the seal of God, which is also
invisible, is an individual choice of whom to obey, symbolizing either God's commands
or Satan's counterfeit.
The mark in the forehead pertaining to both the Mark of the Beast and the seal of
God signifies the moral choice of how they will obey, as the frontal lobe at the
front of the forehead is where moral decisions are made, therefore the mark is
symbolic of that choice.
However, the Mark of the Beast can also be found in the hand, signifying actions.
For example, an atheist or Muslim can keep the global Sunday law by actions,
and by those actions they will receive the mark in their right hand, different to
those who receive the Mark of the Beast in their foreheads by believing and choosing
Sunday as their religion.
And those who refuse the Sunday law will be penalized and persecuted in stages of
fines, imprisonment, and the death penalty.
You may say that the Sabbath day, Saturday, belongs to the Jews,
however the book of Genesis negates this idea, Genesis 2.3, and God blessed the
seventh day and sanctified it, because that in it he had wrested from all
his work which God created and made.
So Genesis chapter 2 verse 3 silences the argument that only the Jews were commanded
to keep the Sabbath.
James chapter 2.10, for whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one
point he is guilty of all.
In the issue of the contest all Christendom will be divided into two great
classes, those who keep the commandment of God and have the faith in Jesus,
and those who worship the beast in his image and receive his mark.
Although church and state will unite in their power to compel small and great,
rich and poor, free and in bond.
Revelation chapter 13 verse 16.
Yet the people of God will not receive it, but Christians of past generations
observed Sunday, supposing that in so doing they were keeping the Bible Sabbath.
And now there are true Christians in every church not accepting the Roman Catholic
communion, who honestly believe that Sunday is the Sabbath of divine
appointment.
God accepts their sincerity of purpose and their integrity before him.
But when the Sunday observance shall be enforced by law, and the world shall be
enlightened concerning the obligation of the true Sabbath, then whosoever shall
transgress the law of God to obey a precept that has no higher authority than
that of Rome, will then honor potpourri above God.
He is paying homage to Rome and to the power that enforces the institution
ordained by Rome, and is worshiping the beast in his image.
Men will then reject the institution that God has declared to be the sign of his
authority and honor in its steed that which Rome has chosen in token of her
supremacy.
They will have then set their sign as their allegiance to Rome, the mark of the
beast, and it is not until the issue is plainly set before the people and they are
brought to choose between the commandments of God and the commandment of men.
Those who continue in transgression will receive the mark of the beast.
Many think the RFID chip will be the mark of the beast.
However this theory does not pass the biblical test, but nevertheless the RFID
chip, facial recognition machines, smart card with SIM, Apple Pay,
and many other identification cards are validation that a world government can
implement a no-buy-sell ultimatum if the Pope's Mark Sunday Law is not observed.