WEBVTT 00:00.000 --> 00:04.400 I'm standing under a statue just opposite the River Thames, and the name just above 00:04.400 --> 00:06.740 my head is William Tyndale. 00:07.960 --> 00:13.420 This 16th century Oxford and Cambridge educated intellect and martyr was skilled 00:13.420 --> 00:21.180 in Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Italian, Spanish, English and French, speaking each 00:21.180 --> 00:25.780 of them just as fluently as each other, an exceptional rare feat in his day. 00:26.700 --> 00:31.680 He has single-handedly played one of the most lasting and influential contributions 00:31.680 --> 00:37.480 to English culture by translating the Bible from Greek and Hebrew into English, 00:37.680 --> 00:42.220 whose wording and phraseology contributed to the English language. 00:43.380 --> 00:49.720 His nemesis Sir Thomas More, whose statue stands in Chelsea, had Tyndale's Bible 00:49.720 --> 00:54.820 burned as well as those who purchased them, which shows the great contempt and 00:54.820 --> 00:59.800 hatred the First Kingdom had, and still has, for the Bible. 01:00.800 --> 01:05.940 But Tyndale's impact was powerful, and it was to grow. 01:06.900 --> 01:12.400 William Whitaker was a 16th century Oxford educated Cambridge professor who was 01:12.400 --> 01:14.040 indebted to Tyndale's Bible. 01:15.080 --> 01:21.100 He published a book in 1588 titled Disputations on Holy Scripture as a 01:21.100 --> 01:27.780 rebuttal to the Italian Jesuit St. Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, who, like Sir Thomas 01:27.780 --> 01:30.980 More, attempted to discredit the Bible. 01:32.280 --> 01:38.160 William Whitaker said, Among these Jesuits, Robert Bellarmine, a native of 01:38.160 --> 01:43.280 Italy, we learn that the Scriptures are no rule of faith at all. 01:44.160 --> 01:48.580 Hence the Jesuit concludes that the Scriptures are obscure. 01:50.160 --> 01:55.400 William Whitaker takes Bellarmine to task and defends the authority of the Bible. 01:56.500 --> 02:00.320 He says for it is not enough to know the words, the letter, or the history, 02:00.720 --> 02:04.180 but a full persuasion is required. 02:05.280 --> 02:10.020 This is what David sought, that he might more and more progress in true 02:10.020 --> 02:12.120 understanding and faith. 02:13.460 --> 02:18.500 This was down to William Tyndale's translation and in the following century 02:18.500 --> 02:20.240 the battle rages on. 02:22.240 --> 02:28.760 Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a 19th century Russian occultist who founded 02:28.760 --> 02:33.780 a Theosophical Society and was one of the chief pioneers of the New Age movement. 02:34.680 --> 02:41.120 But even in her lucifering and glorifying blasphemous statements, she found the 02:41.120 --> 02:45.180 Jesuits the most repulsive and dangerous men on earth. 02:46.040 --> 02:53.240 And in her book, Isis Unveiled Volume 2, she says that the Jesuits have done more 02:53.240 --> 02:58.360 moral harm in this world than all the Finnish armies of the mythical Satan. 02:59.560 --> 03:04.800 Every one of the statements which follows in quotation marks are extracted from 03:04.800 --> 03:09.780 authenticated manuscripts or folios printed by this distinguished body. 03:11.240 --> 03:17.780 She quotes from a 17th century Spanish Jesuit priest, Anthony Escobar Mendoza, 03:18.080 --> 03:23.620 and you can get a picture why the Jesuits were so hated not just by the Protestants, 03:24.440 --> 03:27.440 but by everyone they came into contact with. 03:28.120 --> 03:35.620 Anthony Escobar says, It is lawful to make use of the science acquired through the 03:35.620 --> 03:41.940 assistance of the devil, provided the preservation and use of that knowledge do 03:41.940 --> 03:47.960 not depend upon the devil, for the knowledge is good in itself, and the sin 03:47.960 --> 03:50.960 by which it was acquired has gone by. 03:52.180 --> 03:58.280 This was the mind of a Jesuit, and we will show you that nothing has 03:58.280 --> 03:58.780 changed. 03:59.700 --> 04:04.520 In that same period, the 17th century Cambridge educated Bible scholar, 04:05.340 --> 04:09.860 the English Puritan Thomas Goodwin, who was a chaplain to Oliver Cromwell and 04:09.860 --> 04:15.640 the president of Magdalen College at the University of Oxford, said, That to one 04:15.640 --> 04:22.520 who resolves to fear God and obey him, the name of God is an all-sufficient prop 04:22.520 --> 04:28.640 and stay for his faith to rest on, where he sees nothing in himself or in any 04:28.640 --> 04:31.920 promise in the world belonging to him. 04:33.140 --> 04:37.580 You can see the striking contrast between the papacy and the reformation. 04:38.440 --> 04:43.420 Rome does not like the authority of the Bible, and as it builds, you will see how 04:43.420 --> 04:46.600 the world will fall under her deceptive spell. 04:48.260 --> 04:54.160 Englishman John Wesley was a true 18th century reformer in an era known as the 04:54.160 --> 04:54.900 Great Awakening. 04:56.060 --> 05:01.340 As the founder of the Methodist movement, he wrote a book titled The Explanatory 05:01.340 --> 05:05.780 Notes upon the New Testament that was a guide in helping people have a clear 05:05.780 --> 05:07.500 understanding of the Bible. 05:08.780 --> 05:13.660 He said, The scripture, therefore, of the Old and New Testament is a most 05:13.660 --> 05:17.420 solid and precious system of divine truth. 05:18.040 --> 05:24.280 Every part thereof is worthy of God, and altogether are one entire body wherein 05:24.280 --> 05:26.760 is no defect, no excess. 05:27.540 --> 05:34.520 It is the fountain of heavenly wisdom, which they who are able to taste prefer to 05:34.520 --> 05:39.540 all writings of men, however wise or learned or holy. 05:40.520 --> 05:45.140 But Rome views the inspiration of the Bible as ridiculous. 05:46.320 --> 05:51.420 Johann Gottfried Eichhorn was a German Protestant theologian who is famous for 05:51.420 --> 05:56.180 leading the rationalistic crusade against the Bible that he titled the Higher 05:56.180 --> 05:56.840 Criticism. 05:57.320 --> 06:03.520 But his critique against the Bible was inspired before him by a French Catholic 06:03.520 --> 06:08.960 physician named Jean Astruc who, during the time when John Wesley was 06:08.960 --> 06:14.160 advocating the word of God, he was discrediting its divine inspiration. 06:15.140 --> 06:21.500 In the Roman Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 4, the papacy is open that she 06:21.500 --> 06:23.980 leads the charge in Biblical criticism. 06:24.900 --> 06:27.360 She is open and she is barefaced. 06:28.340 --> 06:33.580 In 1753, Jean Astruc, a French Catholic physician of considerable note, 06:34.260 --> 06:35.840 published a little book. 06:36.180 --> 06:40.080 This is written in French, which the narrator will not attempt to pronounce, 06:41.580 --> 06:45.480 in which he conjectured from the alternating use of two names of God in the 06:45.480 --> 06:51.340 Hebrew Genesis that Moses had incorporated therein two pre-existing documents, 06:51.980 --> 06:55.820 one of which employed Elachim and the other Jehovah. 06:56.740 --> 07:03.260 The idea attracted little attention till it was taken up by a German scholar who 07:03.260 --> 07:07.200 however claimed to have made the discovery independently. 07:07.980 --> 07:10.300 This was Johann Gottfried Eichhorn. 07:11.660 --> 07:15.960 Eichhorn is the first typical representative of modern Biblical 07:15.960 --> 07:20.440 criticism, the especial home of which has been Germany. 07:21.340 --> 07:28.580 Yet it was a Catholic priest of Scottish origin, Alexander Geddes, who breached a 07:28.580 --> 07:33.440 theory of the origin of the five books to which he attached Joshua, exceeding in 07:33.440 --> 07:36.280 boldness either Simon's or Eichhorn's. 07:37.060 --> 07:42.220 This was the well-known fragment hypothesis, which reduced the Pentateuch 07:42.220 --> 07:48.460 to a collection of fragmentary sections partly of Mosaic origin, but put together 07:48.460 --> 07:50.360 in the reign of Solomon. 07:51.420 --> 07:56.320 Geddes' opinion was introduced into Germany in 1805 by Vader. 07:57.380 --> 08:02.780 The first kingdom is a bit more bold, for in the first edition of the Catholic 08:02.780 --> 08:10.020 Encyclopedia, in volume 12, it says that the supremacy of the Bible as a source of 08:10.020 --> 08:16.200 faith is unhistorical, illogical, fatal to the virtue of faith, and 08:16.200 --> 08:18.620 destructive of unity. 08:19.200 --> 08:21.260 It is unhistorical. 08:22.260 --> 08:25.000 This is what the Catholic Church says about the Bible. 08:26.000 --> 08:28.940 In the 19th century, the struggle continued. 08:29.580 --> 08:34.540 In the best-documented work on the Reformation, The History of Protestantism, 08:34.640 --> 08:40.900 Volume 1, the prolific writer and Scotsman, James Aitken Wiley, documents 08:40.900 --> 08:45.880 the papacy's hostility to the Bible from its inception. 08:46.500 --> 08:51.420 It is true, no doubt, that Protestantism, strictly viewed, is simply a principle. 08:52.160 --> 08:53.320 It is not a policy. 08:54.100 --> 08:58.640 It is not an empire having its fleets and armies, its officers and tribunals, 08:59.020 --> 09:02.580 who wish to extend its dominion and make its authority be obeyed. 09:03.440 --> 09:07.820 It is not even a church with its hierarchies and synods and edicts. 09:08.140 --> 09:10.120 It is simply a principle. 09:11.680 --> 09:16.020 They replace the authority of the infallibility with the authority of the 09:16.020 --> 09:16.600 Word of God. 09:18.340 --> 09:19.860 Rome did not give us the Bible. 09:20.980 --> 09:23.720 She did all in her power to keep it from us. 09:24.540 --> 09:29.440 She retained it under the seal of a dead language, and when others broke that seal 09:29.440 --> 09:35.760 and threw open its pages to all, she stood over the book and, unsheathing 09:35.760 --> 09:42.540 her fiery sword, would permit none to read the message of life, save at the peril of 09:42.540 --> 09:43.980 eternal anathema. 09:45.340 --> 09:52.280 Rome has always been more lenient to sceptical than to evangelical views. 09:53.840 --> 10:00.020 In that same century, two highly respected Catholic intellectuals verified what Wiley 10:00.020 --> 10:00.380 said. 10:01.460 --> 10:07.460 In West London is a statue of Cardinal John Henry Newman, an Anglican convert to 10:07.460 --> 10:11.880 Catholicism, who was beatified by Pope Benedict XVI in 2010. 10:13.020 --> 10:18.160 He wrote a book called Arians of the Fourth Century, which was nothing more 10:18.160 --> 10:21.460 than paganism in a Christian mass, and he said, 10:32.240 --> 10:37.760 Going across the Atlantic, the Irish-American Catholic prelate James 10:37.760 --> 10:44.640 Cardinal Gibbons, Bishop of Baltimore, wrote a book in 1876 titled The Faith of 10:44.640 --> 10:45.260 Our Fathers. 10:46.200 --> 10:52.720 Like Abelamine and Jean Astrup before him, he discredits the authority of the Bible. 10:54.980 --> 11:01.420 The scriptures alone do not contain all the truths which a Christian is bound to 11:01.420 --> 11:07.420 believe, nor do they explicitly enjoin all the duties which he is obliged to 11:07.420 --> 11:07.860 practice. 11:08.840 --> 11:15.400 We must, therefore, conclude that the scriptures alone cannot be a sufficient 11:15.400 --> 11:21.840 guide and ruler of faith, because they cannot at any time be within the reach of 11:21.840 --> 11:28.720 every inquirer, because they are not of themselves clear and intelligible even in 11:28.720 --> 11:34.840 matters of the highest importance, and because they do not contain all the 11:34.840 --> 11:37.940 truths necessary for salvation. 11:39.840 --> 11:43.780 That same spirit of heresy, the rejection of the divine inspiration of the Bible, 11:43.780 --> 11:48.500 got its boost with a man whose caricature overlooks the main hall of London's 11:48.500 --> 11:49.520 Natural History Museum. 11:50.260 --> 11:52.080 His name is Charles Darwin. 11:53.100 --> 11:59.420 And this naturalist has been hailed as a great thinker, when his unscientific, 12:00.020 --> 12:04.100 anti-human, contradictory thesis is not original in the slightest. 12:05.200 --> 12:09.940 He published a book in 1859 titled The Origin of Species. 12:10.740 --> 12:16.180 But as you open it up, it is actually called The Origin of Species by Means of 12:16.180 --> 12:21.980 Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggles for Life. 12:24.430 --> 12:29.920 I can entertain, no doubt, after the most deliberate study and dispassionate 12:29.920 --> 12:35.440 judgment of which I am capable, that the view which most naturalists until 12:35.440 --> 12:42.420 recently entertained, and which I formally entertained, namely that each species has 12:42.420 --> 12:46.720 been independently created, is erroneous. 12:48.820 --> 12:52.940 So there is absolutely no difference between Darwinism and the Papacy. 12:53.540 --> 12:59.520 They both reject the authority of the word and teach a trust in man and nature. 13:00.420 --> 13:01.180 And J.A. 13:01.220 --> 13:04.340 Wiley's prophetic critique of Papacy is accurate. 13:05.480 --> 13:10.100 Your average person has never heard of the late Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, 13:10.500 --> 13:13.760 a French paleontologist and Jesuit priest. 13:14.580 --> 13:20.620 It has been proven that he is the most sought-after writer in New Age and occult 13:20.620 --> 13:21.360 circles. 13:21.940 --> 13:27.740 He attempted to blend Pantheism and Christianity together and has influenced 13:27.740 --> 13:30.920 some of the most influential globalists in the world. 13:31.800 --> 13:37.380 The late Dr. Aurelio Picchi, an Italian industrialist who founded the Club of 13:37.380 --> 13:42.860 Rome, was a student of the teachings of this Jesuit and used his pantheistic 13:42.860 --> 13:47.460 philosophy in his book Mankind at the Turning Point. 13:48.480 --> 13:54.400 The late Robert Muller was a Catholic New Age lawyer-economist and former UN 13:54.400 --> 13:59.660 Assistant Secretary General, and in his book New Genesis, shaping a global 13:59.660 --> 14:05.980 spirituality, he is also a student of the teachings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. 14:06.840 --> 14:11.140 And Marshall Macaulay, the Canadian philosopher of communication theory, 14:11.700 --> 14:17.140 who has been titled the Oracle of the Electronic Age, who coined the phrases the 14:17.140 --> 14:23.980 medium is a message and the global village, was also a student of the 14:23.980 --> 14:29.660 pantheistic teachings of the Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. 14:30.760 --> 14:36.340 He was an outward-staunch Marxist, being the intellectual godfather of 14:36.340 --> 14:43.700 liberation theology, but he was also a Darwinist who said that evolution is a 14:43.700 --> 14:51.040 condition to which all theories must bow, a curve all lines must follow. 14:52.560 --> 14:59.040 The highest-ranking Jesuit on earth, Friar Adolfo Nicholas, the Superior 14:59.040 --> 15:04.100 General of the Jesuits, sometimes referred to as the Black Pope, defends Jesuit 15:04.100 --> 15:09.120 scientists and says that the Jesuits are accused by Bible-believing Christians, 15:09.520 --> 15:13.920 who he labels as Puritans, as being too worldly. 15:16.220 --> 15:26.100 If there is anything that we, sometimes, we are accused by more Puritan Christians, 15:27.380 --> 15:32.760 we are accused of something is of being too much in the world, you know, 15:33.100 --> 15:37.880 but I think this is there from the very beginning, from Saint Ignatius. 15:38.300 --> 15:44.320 That's why we have so many Jesuit scientists and so many Jesuit astronomers. 15:45.520 --> 15:50.440 The late Avram Manhattan, one of the few 20th century intellectual investigative 15:50.440 --> 15:57.760 writers, wrote a book that was published in 1967 titled Catholic Power Today, 15:58.480 --> 16:03.200 where he shows that the Vatican's Jesuit scientists want to control and influence 16:03.200 --> 16:05.200 the whole of modern science. 16:08.440 --> 16:14.000 Dozens of Jesuits were earning doctorates in space sciences or cooperating with 16:14.000 --> 16:18.140 laymen in space research centers in many parts of the United States. 16:18.960 --> 16:24.220 The Jesuits' prophecy, in all probability, will be fulfilled, thus proving, 16:24.640 --> 16:31.940 if proof there need be, that no field of human activity, from the sly promotion of 16:31.940 --> 16:38.260 asinine superstitions to the latest advanced space exploits, is neglected by 16:38.260 --> 16:41.220 the ceaseless vigilance of the Catholic Church. 16:42.300 --> 16:48.140 Everything on earth, even outside the earth, is her rightful target in the 16:48.140 --> 16:51.840 continuous aggrandizement of her dominion. 16:52.960 --> 16:55.640 Was this a loose statement from Avram Manhattan? 16:56.360 --> 17:01.860 Or are they actually a high number of Jesuit astronomers who would like to have 17:01.860 --> 17:06.100 a mass influence on how the world views science? 17:14.660 --> 17:19.220 There are so many ways for people to get involved in the Vatican Observatory 17:19.220 --> 17:19.540 Foundation. 17:20.040 --> 17:24.120 You don't need to be a scientist or an astrophysicist or even a Jesuit to 17:24.120 --> 17:25.720 appreciate the work that they do. 17:25.920 --> 17:30.580 And many of the videos are posted online at the Foundation website, which are easy 17:30.580 --> 17:34.180 interpretations for lay people of what the Jesuit scientists are doing. 17:34.860 --> 17:42.000 The Vatican Observatory Foundation is a way that astronomy becomes not what 17:42.000 --> 17:44.380 they're doing, but what we're doing. 17:44.980 --> 17:53.540 It's a direct way that they can share in the fun, the excitement, and the wonder of 17:53.540 --> 17:54.860 the discoveries that we're making. 17:55.500 --> 18:00.680 These Jesuits have become so influential that they are doing lectures at the Human 18:00.680 --> 18:02.120 Rights Forum, TED. 18:03.260 --> 18:07.920 But looking at their past track record, do the Jesuits want to glorify God? 18:09.200 --> 18:13.920 The Jesuit friar George Cohen, in an interview with the anti-religious 18:13.920 --> 18:17.140 Bill Maher, discredits the Bible. 18:18.040 --> 18:22.360 The reason is simply historical facts. 18:23.240 --> 18:28.200 I mean, John Paul II, for instance, said evolution in a neo-Darwinian sense is 18:28.200 --> 18:29.620 no longer a mere hypothesis. 18:30.400 --> 18:37.240 I mean, he said that Christian scriptures were written between about 2,000 years 18:37.240 --> 18:40.480 before Christ to about 200 years after Christ. 18:40.740 --> 18:41.340 That's it. 18:41.620 --> 18:47.560 Modern science came to be with Galileo, up through Newton, up through Einstein, 18:47.560 --> 18:52.060 what we know as modern science, okay, is in that period. 18:52.520 --> 18:56.480 How in the world could there be any science in scripture? 18:57.460 --> 18:58.340 There cannot be. 18:59.260 --> 19:03.200 Just the two historical periods are separated by so much. 19:03.840 --> 19:06.740 The scriptures are not teaching science. 19:07.740 --> 19:12.960 It's very hard for me to accept not just a literal interpretation of scripture, 19:13.140 --> 19:15.860 but a fundamentalist approach to religious belief. 19:16.560 --> 19:19.120 So he says the Bible has no science. 19:20.240 --> 19:26.600 Did not the 8th century BC prophet Isaiah say, it is he that sits upon the circle of 19:26.600 --> 19:31.060 the earth, confirming that the earth is spherical and globular in shape? 19:31.360 --> 19:35.620 Did not the patriarch Job say that he stretches out the north over the empty 19:35.620 --> 19:41.140 place and hangeth the earth upon nothing, verifying that the earth is suspended on 19:41.140 --> 19:42.240 its own in space? 19:43.480 --> 19:47.580 Did not the same patriarch Job, when describing God's mighty hand in 19:47.580 --> 19:52.600 creating the universe, say, which maketh Arcturus, that is the brightest star in 19:52.600 --> 19:56.860 the northern celestial hemisphere, Orion, the most recognized constellation 19:56.860 --> 20:01.940 in the night sky, and Pleiades, the seventh star of the nearest star 20:01.940 --> 20:04.500 cluster to earth and the chambers of the south? 20:06.260 --> 20:11.100 Did not the king Solomon teach us to study and to learn from nature, when he said, 20:11.520 --> 20:16.960 Go to the ant, thou sluggard, consider her ways, and be wise, which having no guide, 20:17.400 --> 20:23.020 overseer, provideth her meat in the summer, and gareth her food in the 20:23.020 --> 20:23.400 harvest? 20:24.300 --> 20:26.480 What Bible is this Jesuit reading? 20:27.500 --> 20:32.900 He then comes more bolder in an interview with the most famous atheist on earth, 20:33.340 --> 20:40.220 Richard Dawkins, and clearly shows the Jesuit position on the origins of life. 20:41.440 --> 20:46.220 Could you then tell us what your own position as George Coyne is on evolution 20:46.220 --> 20:47.320 and intelligent design? 20:47.600 --> 20:53.240 My position as George Coyne, and I think it represents a significant number of 20:53.240 --> 20:55.480 Catholic scientists, is the following. 20:56.000 --> 21:03.100 That the best scientific explanation we have of the origin of the universe and 21:03.100 --> 21:10.480 everything in the universe, including all living systems and ourselves, is by what I 21:10.480 --> 21:13.500 call Neo-Darwinian evolution. 21:14.660 --> 21:17.680 And I think we all know what we mean by that. 21:17.820 --> 21:23.500 That is, that the whole theory of Darwin modernized with genetic mutation, 21:24.140 --> 21:29.800 natural selection, and all of that, I think is the best scientific explanation 21:29.800 --> 21:32.780 we have of these origins that I spoke of. 21:32.960 --> 21:34.300 Well, I clearly agree with that. 21:34.500 --> 21:38.860 This is also the current position of mainstream secular science. 21:39.560 --> 21:42.400 Denial of evolution is unique to the United States. 21:42.760 --> 21:46.760 Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology. 21:47.260 --> 21:50.100 It explains so much of the world around us. 21:50.180 --> 21:58.340 If you try to ignore that, your world view just becomes crazy, just untenable, 21:58.340 --> 21:59.580 self-inconsistent. 22:00.060 --> 22:09.440 And I say to the grown-ups, if you want to deny evolution and live in your world 22:09.440 --> 22:12.780 that's completely inconsistent with everything we observe in the universe, 22:12.900 --> 22:13.380 that's fine. 22:13.920 --> 22:16.360 But don't make your kids do it, because we need them. 22:16.900 --> 22:21.640 And in the UK, Nicky Morgan, who became the Secretary of State for Education in 22:21.640 --> 22:27.580 July 2014, has, according to the London Guardian newspaper, allowed local 22:27.580 --> 22:33.600 authorities to cut off funding to nurseries promoting extremist views. 22:34.880 --> 22:38.460 Which is teaching a child creationism. 22:39.840 --> 22:45.040 So teaching a child that God created the earth in 6 days and the rest of the 7th is 22:45.040 --> 22:46.980 extremism? 22:48.300 --> 22:51.200 Let us carefully assess Social Darwinism. 22:52.320 --> 22:57.260 Darwin's book has never properly been scrutinised by mainstream secular 22:57.260 --> 22:57.820 scientists. 22:58.900 --> 23:03.960 But let us quote Darwin's contradictory, speculative and self-condemning theory. 23:05.260 --> 23:11.300 He says, it seems to me almost certain that an ordinary quadruped might be 23:11.300 --> 23:13.820 converted into a giraffe. 23:14.660 --> 23:20.520 Well, there is no evidence in the fossil record a giraffe has always been a 23:20.520 --> 23:21.420 giraffe. 23:22.020 --> 23:27.720 And all quadrupeds that are four-legged animals are, according to Genesis 1, 23:28.080 --> 23:31.560 verses 24 and 25, created independently. 23:32.220 --> 23:35.280 And there is no evolving into one species into another. 23:36.220 --> 23:37.580 He continues to speculate. 23:39.300 --> 23:45.340 Although no graduated links of structure fitted for gliding through the air now 23:45.340 --> 23:51.000 connect the Galiopithecus with the other insectivore, yet there is no difficulty 23:51.000 --> 23:53.580 that such links formerly existed. 23:54.760 --> 24:01.000 It has been asked by the opponents of such views as I hold, how, for instance, 24:01.160 --> 24:06.840 could a land carnivorous animal have been converted into one with aquatic habits? 24:08.580 --> 24:11.560 Innumerable transitional forms must have existed. 24:12.700 --> 24:16.540 Why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the 24:16.540 --> 24:16.780 earth? 24:17.700 --> 24:22.500 He repeats his astonishment for the lack of evidence in the fossil record to verify 24:22.500 --> 24:23.140 his theory. 24:24.520 --> 24:28.640 Why do we not find closely linking intermediate varieties? 24:29.940 --> 24:33.260 He repeats a third time that there is no evidence. 24:34.440 --> 24:39.600 Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such 24:39.600 --> 24:40.820 intermediate links? 24:41.940 --> 24:47.540 Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain. 24:48.560 --> 24:55.140 And this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged 24:55.140 --> 24:56.820 against the theory. 24:58.080 --> 25:03.080 Even though films come out to revere Charles Darwin and his theory, 25:04.380 --> 25:10.660 he of his own self says there is nothing in the fossil record to verify what he 25:10.660 --> 25:11.500 said at all. 25:12.480 --> 25:16.720 So if there is no tangible physical evidence in the fossil record, 25:17.340 --> 25:20.760 then what on earth are scientists teaching people? 25:21.800 --> 25:28.220 Many will argue that was over 150 years ago and we cannot judge a man on the scant 25:28.220 --> 25:29.240 evidence of his day. 25:29.940 --> 25:33.600 But has any evidence been discovered since then? 25:35.820 --> 25:37.820 If I'm not human, what am I? 25:38.000 --> 25:39.440 The next step in human evolution. 25:50.510 --> 25:56.290 In the London Economist in 2005, an interesting article is written on 25:56.290 --> 26:04.310 Darwinism and the social sciences and it says, exactly how humanity became human is 26:04.310 --> 26:07.710 still a matter of debate. 26:08.890 --> 26:11.030 Well, they will be debating for a very long time. 26:12.190 --> 26:19.270 In a scientific magazine called Discover Presents, he says, the origins and nature 26:19.270 --> 26:25.030 of our most distant ancestors, the first primates, remain largely 26:25.030 --> 26:26.130 unknown. 26:27.170 --> 26:32.090 Exactly how and when the groups diverged is still a mystery. 26:35.390 --> 26:44.130 In the 23rd of June 2003 edition of Time magazine, it reads that new fossils prove 26:44.130 --> 26:51.630 that the first homo sapiens looked like us, walked like us and in some ways acted 26:51.630 --> 26:53.390 like us as well. 26:54.630 --> 26:57.870 The scientific evidence is not supporting Darwinism. 26:58.830 --> 27:05.950 In the London Independent newspaper dated to Friday April 9th 2010, it reads that 27:05.950 --> 27:12.550 the paucity or lack of evidence in the fossil record for this critical period in 27:12.550 --> 27:22.910 human history has cast doubt on exactly how the ape to human transition occurred. 27:23.850 --> 27:25.910 Wow, no evidence. 27:26.790 --> 27:27.730 Interesting. 27:28.910 --> 27:31.570 I filmed this chimp in Whipsnade Zoo. 27:32.890 --> 27:38.130 We can't ignore the similarities between primates and humans, but they are two 27:38.130 --> 27:44.810 separate distinct species and the evidence by secular scientists refutes once again 27:44.810 --> 27:46.190 Darwinism. 27:47.550 --> 27:54.410 The London Independent dated Tuesday the 14th of April 2009 proves over again that 27:54.410 --> 27:58.570 chimps and man are two separate species. 27:59.190 --> 28:06.170 It reads, humanity's immediate predecessors may have had trouble climbing 28:06.170 --> 28:13.150 trees, research suggests, so they may not have been as ape-like as many experts 28:13.150 --> 28:13.590 believe. 28:14.470 --> 28:19.510 It has been widely assumed that the earliest humans were ape-like, 28:19.790 --> 28:26.630 but the research contradicts this idea, showing that unlike modern chimps, 28:27.270 --> 28:33.550 ancient humans were not designed to climb trees. 28:34.910 --> 28:36.510 Wow, they just realised. 28:37.150 --> 28:41.950 But this has not stopped the papacy from embracing the unscientific views of 28:41.950 --> 28:47.730 Darwinism, where scientists still fail to tell the public on the origins of life, 28:48.110 --> 28:55.030 on how it happened, when it happened, and what species turned into what. 29:02.510 --> 29:07.690 Those seem to me to be scientific questions, or potentially scientific 29:07.690 --> 29:08.150 questions. 29:08.410 --> 29:12.050 If there are some questions of that sort that science can never answer, 29:12.870 --> 29:16.410 then we should at least keep trying to answer them. 29:16.470 --> 29:21.250 And if science can't answer them, religion having a crack at answering them, 29:21.770 --> 29:26.710 if there's no reason to think that religion has any basis for an answer, 29:26.850 --> 29:28.750 then why would religion have a crack? 29:28.830 --> 29:31.790 Why would you bother to listen to religion having a crack at answering them? 29:32.790 --> 29:36.030 I mean, one thing I would say is there may be questions that science can't answer, 29:36.130 --> 29:40.870 like the origin of everything, but if science can't answer them, 29:40.990 --> 29:43.610 then religion certainly can't, and nothing else can either. 29:43.970 --> 29:50.470 But one Jesuit scientist has a far more vast influence on modern science than 29:50.470 --> 29:51.330 people can imagine. 29:52.310 --> 29:55.750 And one of the most respected astrophysicists in North America, 29:56.570 --> 30:01.230 Neil deGrasse Tyson, informs us where he gets his inspiration from. 30:01.890 --> 30:08.050 You learn, oh, the molecules and the atoms of those molecules in my body are 30:08.050 --> 30:14.110 traceable to stars across the galaxy that have lived their lives, manufactured these 30:14.110 --> 30:21.630 elements, exploded them into the universe, from which new generations of star systems 30:21.630 --> 30:22.270 were formed. 30:22.890 --> 30:26.350 So I look up at the night sky, I don't feel small, I feel large. 30:26.530 --> 30:28.930 I feel connected to the universe. 30:29.010 --> 30:31.390 It's not just we here on Earth, that's there. 30:31.730 --> 30:33.130 We are one. 30:33.590 --> 30:38.310 And that link, for me, is one of the most profound discoveries of modern 30:38.310 --> 30:39.030 astrophysics. 30:42.390 --> 30:46.630 Trying to understand this deep connection that people have to the forest. 30:47.770 --> 30:54.110 She talks about a network of energy that flows through all living things. 30:55.070 --> 31:00.850 She says, all energy is only borrowed, and one day you have to give it back. 31:01.810 --> 31:03.930 We know why we got, we had a big bang. 31:04.050 --> 31:05.390 Big bang put everything into motion. 31:05.510 --> 31:06.270 I'm good with that. 31:06.730 --> 31:07.190 We're good. 31:07.610 --> 31:11.590 The person who did that was a Belgian priest, Georges Lemaitre. 31:12.470 --> 31:14.970 He's a priest, physicist, physicist priest. 31:15.650 --> 31:19.010 What a cool thing to have on your business card. 31:19.490 --> 31:22.130 You got people coming and going with that. 31:22.490 --> 31:28.330 But he calculated what the implications of Einstein's general relativity, 31:28.970 --> 31:33.450 which was the new theory of gravity, would be with Hubble's expanding universe. 31:33.630 --> 31:37.990 And he says, the whole universe may have begun in a singular point in the past. 31:38.890 --> 31:45.050 And thus, big bang as a phrase was used pejoratively of this idea, but it stuck. 31:45.610 --> 31:53.490 So, there's no sign that everything will ever be fully known, because this moving 31:53.490 --> 31:55.490 frontier continues to bring us more questions. 31:56.290 --> 32:01.350 According to the Catholic press, the big bang theory was first described, 32:01.850 --> 32:08.630 but not so named, by the French Jesuit Georges Lemaitre in the late 1920s. 32:11.110 --> 32:17.910 Georges Lemaitre is a Jesuit whose theory he first proposed in 1931 that was 32:17.910 --> 32:22.070 actually called, at the time, the primeval atom hypothesis. 32:22.870 --> 32:29.990 And it is amazing that a Roman Catholic Jesuit priest can make many all over the 32:29.990 --> 32:37.130 world believe that an explosion just appeared from nowhere and formed the 32:37.130 --> 32:44.270 universe and the planet we now inhabit, and steer the direction of the 32:44.270 --> 32:47.110 astrophysicists in the scientific community. 32:48.450 --> 32:52.910 The Vatican still works with the most prestigious and highly decorated 32:52.910 --> 32:58.770 scientists of our day, but their ultimate aim will not be to give God the glory, 32:59.810 --> 33:03.310 but to give man the glory, as George Coyne confirmed. 33:04.370 --> 33:10.010 And we shall continue how she will finally accomplish this in the New World Disorder 33:10.010 --> 33:11.470 part 2. 33:13.130 --> 33:16.430 If there's one thing I've enjoyed about doing this study of the two kingdoms, 33:16.690 --> 33:17.750 is the feedback from people. 33:18.210 --> 33:22.210 People are actually researching for themselves, analyzing for themselves. 33:22.310 --> 33:23.830 It shows that they will not be deceived. 33:24.390 --> 33:27.450 You know, people are very easily led by an individual, and I'm glad that you actually 33:27.450 --> 33:30.970 take an instruction that I'm giving, that you are actually observing everything 33:30.970 --> 33:31.810 which is being presented. 33:32.550 --> 33:35.650 In the next study, we're going to be looking at one of the most controversial 33:35.650 --> 33:37.870 geopolitical conflicts in the world. 33:38.630 --> 33:40.450 It is in a region called Palestine. 33:41.050 --> 33:45.070 I just want to warn you that there's a lot of information on there, and the last half 33:45.070 --> 33:47.150 an hour is a very solid Bible study. 33:47.780 --> 33:50.910 In the meantime, thank you for the support, and please continue to watch the 33:50.910 --> 33:53.210 series of The Two Kingdoms.