I would like to introduce this call for discernment as one that is the most
crucial call for all of Christianity worldwide.
And I would like to do so by stating very briefly that before I was saved by the
Lord, I was hopelessly lost in conspiracy theories.
I was learning lots of truth, lots of things that are actually true.
There are certain secret societies and things.
There is something called the Illuminati.
These things do exist.
However, it's important to know the origins of them.
For instance, lots of people do not know that Adam Myself was a Jesuit.
People do not know things like that.
They are not interested.
Men like Alex Jones will not discuss the Jesuits.
Unfortunately, at the time, I was not a Christian.
I had no interest in Jesus Christ.
And a great deal of what I was learning was just being spoon-fed me by lying New
Age snake oil salesmen coming up with all kinds of bogus arguments about the Bible
and just lots of other nonsense.
I can now see, however, that I was living in a foolish arrogance by presuming that I
would be free from all of the lies once the Lord saved me.
Indeed, there is more deception, I feel, within Christianity than outside.
And the reason being is that Jesus Christ is the truth and Satan is the father of
lies.
He has never stopped trying to kick up clouds of dirt to obscure the truth and
Christianity is far from exempt.
Indeed, it appears that Satan's hardest work has gone into confusing Christianity
as a sort of mimic of how God confused Satan's children at the Tower of Babel.
Now, I am making this video because the Lord has shown me that the majority of
Christians believe in two specific sets of doctrine which have been created
absolutely by the children of the devil and are thus inspired by the spirit of our
enemy.
Now, for most Christians, the things I am about to state and conclude upon will come
as a surprise.
But I would ask you to not simply dismiss the facts I will present nor simply to
believe everything I have said but rather pray to God in the name of the Lord Jesus
Christ that he would reveal the truth of these matters to you and guide you in all
truth by the power of his Holy Spirit.
I make no apology for presenting this information quite informally and
unprofessionally.
I want for you to examine the facts for yourselves.
The Lord has shown me that as his children we can only ever be truly convinced of
something if our father has told us it is true.
May God guide you in all truth.
The Reformation is a title typically given to the movement that saw the providence of
God sweep across Europe with men independently seeking to translate the
Bible into native tongues.
Ultimately, the people were enlightened by this and broke free of the yoke of papal
authority, persecution and blinding false doctrine.
Before this were the Dark Ages which as one would expect by its name was a time in
which Rome kept the masses blind with only certain priests being allowed to read the
scriptures.
No questioning of papal authority was allowed and of course before as well as
after the Reformation if anyone were to be found translating the Bible or reading it
illegally they were to be executed by the papacy.
So the Reformation is absolutely crucial for all of Christianity.
We have so much to be grateful for.
Indeed we should be praising God that we even have his word and that we can read it
in peace and yet so many people leave it on their shelves to collect dust.
But it's the main debate of the Reformation it's the main contradiction
between the two parties that I want to examine here as we begin.
In the Bondage of the Will, which was written by Martin Luther he replied to the
Roman Catholic scholar Erasmus and Erasmus' diatribe, the freedom of the will
though disagreeing with everything else Erasmus wrote Luther at least commended
Erasmus for recognising that the crux of the matter at issue between Rome and the
Bible believers was the debate over free will.
In this regard Luther wrote but unlike all the rest, you alone have attacked the real
issue the essence of the matter in dispute i.e.
man's so-called free will and his salvation you and you alone saw what was
that grand hinge upon which the whole turned and therefore you attacked the
vital part at once for which from my heart I thank you.
And I thank him too, as it makes my job in this video that much easier and it allows
us to see Satan's scheming so that we are not ignorant of his devices and from this
we can see that the major factor of debate for the Reformation as identified by
Luther was God's sovereignty or man's free will in his salvation something resolved
so brilliantly by the Apostle Paul in Romans chapter 9 with verses such as 15
and 16 which say for he saith to Moses I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy
and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion So then it is not of him
that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.
The Papists were on the side of the free will of man in his salvation, and the
Protestants were on the side of God electing us to salvation as we are told in
Ephesians chapter one with verses like four to six.
According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world,
that we should be holy and without blame before him in love, having predestinated
us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good
pleasure of his will, to the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made
us accepted in the beloved.
The doctrines of free will and the most common form of eschatology, held by the
overwhelming majority of supposedly Protestant denominations, were in fact
given to the churches by the Vatican through their militant arm, the Jesuits.
I will now elaborate on this matter, but before we continue it is necessary to
identify who the Jesuits are and their purpose.
The Jesuits or the Society of Jesus or Los Alambrados as it was originally known,
which being interpreted is the Illuminati, was created by Ignatius Loyola in
September of 1540.
Loyola was the author of spiritual exercises and he experienced mystic
visions beginning in 1523.
In the visions it was revealed to Loyola that he was to be the originator and the
master of a grand army that would do battle with what he considered Babylonian
hordes.
We can see that the Jesuits are a corrupt tree, which of course bears corrupt fruit,
by the oath that they are to swear for initiation and as such anything to do with
them is to be avoided at all costs.
I was going to read some excerpts of the Jesuit extreme oath of induction as
recorded in the journals of the 62nd Congress, the United States Congressional
Record, however it's just far too blasphemous.
Of course it venerates Mary, of course it venerates the Pope, calling him holy and
putting him in the place of God, of course, and it calls the superior
general of the Jesuits, it calls him the the ghostly father, which I find both
blasphemous and just a bit weird really.
Of course it talks about seeking to use subtlety and subterfuge to undermine
governments of the world and to depose kings and leaders of countries.
Of course it very specifically attacks Martin Luther, what it calls the Huguenots
and Calvinists and other Protestant groups at the time and it basically says that
they are to kill all Protestants if need be and it says something about doing
something horrible to their infants if need be.
I find the whole thing absolutely disgusting and I've decided actually that
I will not read it out.
I have, however, left a link for you to read it yourself if you so wish.
The thing that strikes me, of course, is that the loving Lord Jesus Christ,
who told us to love our enemies and not to hinder the little children from coming to
him, would not have had such filth spew from his stainless lips as doing to
children what is described in this oath.
It's not quite being as harmless as doves now, is it?
Let alone the fact that the Lord told us not to swear oaths at all.
I feel it quite correctly identifies Jesuitism as a corrupt tree and therefore
anything that comes from Jesuitism is a corrupt fruit.
And as believers we have a duty to be aware and to leave it and have nothing to
do with it.
The scripture comes to mind when I read this oath, Matthew 7, 15.
Beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are
ravening wolves.
The intent of the Jesuits and certainly the intent of Loyola, who believed he had
received this call from Mary, the mother of Jesus, was to enact a
counter-reformation, as it is called, to undo the work of the reformers.
Being a man who despised the doctrines of grace, Loyola saw the Protestants as the
Babylonian hordes which he should exterminate from the face of the whole
earth, as the oath declares.
We certainly can know them by their fruits.
We should not be surprised that the Jesuits fully recognize the significance
of the great debate of God's sovereignty over man's free... sorry, God's
sovereignty or man's free will in salvation.
This debate was the crux of the Reformation, as Luther rightly identified
it.
Indeed, the Jesuits were even playing a part in this battle for biblical truth,
as I shall now show.
In 1545, the Council of Trent was convened by Pope Paul III.
In this council, the Catholic Church adopted a stance on justification that was
blatantly contrary to the Scriptures.
In Canon 9 of the Council, the Church declared, If anyone sayeth that by faith
alone the impious is justified, in such wise as to mean that nothing else
is required to cooperate in order to the obtaining the grace of justification,
and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the
movement of his own will, let him be anathema, or accursed, that could be,
I suppose.
During the same council, the Jesuits were ordered by the Pope to make war silently
and openly against the Reformation.
And that's exactly what we see them doing.
They were opposed to the doctrines of grace, that God saves men whom he has
chosen before the foundation of the world, and said that it is man's free will,
and that man must cooperate in some manner.
I know that Arminians would strongly disagree that this is what they believe.
However, when we look at history and when we look at the facts, we can see that it
tells a completely different story.
When the papers of Archbishop Laud, a self-confessed Jesuit, were examined,
this letter was found among them, dated March 1628, a Jesuit's letter sent
to the Rector at Brussels about the ensuing Parliament.
Now, the design of this letter was to give the superior of the Jesuits, then resident
at Brussels, an account of the posture of civil and ecclesiastical affairs in
England.
Here is an extract of that letter.
Father Rector, let not the damp of astonishment seize upon your ardent and
zealous soul in apprehending the unexpected calling of a Parliament.
We have now strings to our bow.
We have planted that sovereign drug, Arminianism, which we hope will purge the
Protestants from their heresy, and it flourisheth and bears fruit in due
season.
For the better prevention of the Puritans, the Arminians have already locked up the
Duke of Buckingham's ears, and we have those of our own religion which stand
continually at the Duke's chamber to see who goes in and out.
We cannot be too circumspect and careful in this regard.
I am at this time transported with joy to see how happily all instruments and means,
as well as lesser, co-operate unto our purposes.
But to return unto the main fabric, our foundation is Arminianism.
The Arminians and projectors, as it appears in the premises, affect mutation.
This we second and enforce by probable arguments.
That's taken from Hidden Works of Darkness, page 89 and 90.
For more about this, please see the link to an article entitled Arminianism,
The Road to Rome.
From this we can see quite clearly that the Jesuits believed that Arminianism was
a drug, that they had planted into Protestantism to undermine the beliefs
which they call heresy, and that it will bear fruit in due season as to undermine
the Puritans who held to, of course, the doctrines of grace.
And, of course, they even talk about undermining the Duke of Buckingham,
so undermining the government, the constitutional system of England at
the time.
And this is to affect mutation, so this is to alter Christianity to their
end.
Now, if you're a Christian and you're watching this video and you've never even
heard of Arminianism, it's likely that you are probably going to be an Arminian
because, well, most Christians they actually are, so I'd invite you just to
please continue listening before you examine any of the links I'll post.
Now, the doctrines that Luther was defending against the attack of the
Papists, they are typically called Calvinism, although, like Charles
Spurgeon, I don't really feel that this term is correct.
These biblical concepts are often called the doctrines of grace.
Now, to quote Spurgeon, the doctrines of original sin, election, effectual calling,
final perseverance, and all those great truths which are called Calvinism,
though Calvin was not the author of them but simply an able writer and preacher
upon the subject, are, I believe, the essential doctrines of the gospel that
is in Jesus Christ.
However, the Counter-Reformation was a success, and the doctrines that the
Jesuits sought to undermine have all but disappeared here in the UK, where I live.
When the doctrines of grace are preached, they are typically promulgated by false
teachers in the US, mixing God's sovereignty with other teachings given
them and invented by the Jesuits.
I can think of, just as an example, John MacArthur.
John MacArthur is upheld as some great hero of what is called Calvinism.
However, the man, I mean, by any observation, appears to hold to Futurism
and Dispensationalism.
Don't worry if you're not familiar with those terms.
I will expound upon what they mean and show you exactly where they come from now.
Now, I've said that you will know the Jesuits by their fruits.
But what of the fruits of Arminianism, which Lord said that it would bear in due
season?
Before this is fully examined, we have to expose another doctrine held,
again, by the vast majority of supposedly Protestant Christianity today.
Now, we'll look at Futurism.
I mentioned Futurism, and I mentioned Dispensationalism.
Let's look at the Book of Revelation now.
Let's look at Eschatology, because this is very important in showing the means and
ends of the Jesuits and just how powerful they have been in undermining Protestant
Christianity.
Now, like I said before, if you haven't heard of Arminianism, well, actually,
it probably turns out that being a Christian today, you probably are an
Arminian, and you had no idea.
Similarly, you may very well go to a church that teaches some kind of Futurism.
I'll just expound on what I mean by that.
There are typically four different ways of interpreting the Book of Revelation of
Jesus Christ.
The Preterist view says that the Book of Revelation has already been fulfilled in
the past.
Now, this view is often held to by Romanists, the Papists, and this was
developed by a Jesuit priest named Louis de Alcazar.
The second is as follows.
Now, I'm just going to quote extensively from Wikipedia here, as any good scholar
would.
But before I do so, I should point out that at the time of the Reformation,
for a few hundred years after, and indeed to many pre-Reformation
Reformers, it was entirely apparent that the Papacy was the Antichrist.
I'm not going to present an argument in this video for that here, but for more
information on that, on how the view became apparent, and whether it is so,
please see the links in the description box.
I very strongly recommend that you do research this and examine this and pray
about that.
Now, back to Wiki and the second way of interpreting Revelation.
The view of Futurism, a product of the Counter Reformation, was advanced
beginning in the 16th century, in response to the identification of the
Papacy as Antichrist.
Francisco Ribeira, remember that name, a Jesuit priest, developed this theory in
Sacrum Beati Ionis Apostoli and Evangelistiae Apocalypse Commentarii,
his 1585 treatise on the Apocalypse of John.
And Saint Bellamine, remember that name as well, codified this view, giving in full
the Catholic theory set forth by the Greek and Latin Fathers of a personal Antichrist
to come just before the end of the world and to be accepted by the Jews and
enthroned in the Temple at Jerusalem, thus endeavouring to dispose of the
exposition which saw Antichrist in the Pope.
Most pre-millennial dispensationalists now accept interpretation in modified form.
Widespread Protestant identification of the Papacy as the Antichrist persisted in
the USA until the early 1900s when the Scofield Reference Bible was published by
Cyrus Scofield.
This commentary promoted Futurism, causing a decline in the Protestant
identification of the Papacy as Antichrist.
Some US Futurists hold that some time prior to the expected return of Jesus,
there will be a period of great tribulation during which the Antichrist,
indwelt and controlled by Satan, will attempt to win supporters with false
peace and supernatural signs.
He will silence all that defy him by refusing to receive his mark on their
right hands or forehead.
This mark will be required to legally partake in the end-time economic system.
Some Futurists believe that the Antichrist will be assassinated halfway through the
tribulation, being revived and indwelt by Satan.
The Antichrist will continue on for three and a half years following this deadly
wound.
In 1590, Ribera published a commentary on the Revelation as a counter-interpretation
to the prevailing view among Protestants which identified the Papacy with the
Antichrist.
Ribera applied all of Revelation but the earliest chapters to the end-time rather
than to the history of the Church.
Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and
would rebuild Jerusalem.
That quote in particular comes from George Eldon Ladd in the Blessed Hope,
a biblical study of the Second Advent and Rapture.
Now, another quote here is, Ribera denied the Protestant scriptural Antichrist.
That comes from 2 Thessalonians 2, as seated in the Church of God,
he set on an infidel Antichrist outside the Church of God.
That quote is by Ralph Thompson.
The result of his work, Ribera's work, was a twisting and maligning of prophetic
truth, according to Robert Carangola.
So what I'm getting at with these quotes here is that basically 1,500 years of
prophetic history was just swept under the proverbial rug.
And how could that possibly happen?
Well, you see, the Jesuits had added the infamous gap.
They added something called the gap theory that teaches that when Rome fell in 70 AD,
prophecy just stopped, and it would only continue again right around the time of
the commonly held to secret rapture.
Thus, the ten horns, the little horn, the beast, and the Antichrist have nothing
to do with Christians today.
According to this viewpoint, absolutely no prophecies were fulfilled during the Dark
Ages, or during all these massively momentous occasions.
In man's history, that have occurred and will continue to occur until the
dispensationalists and the, well, the papists, for instance, agree that the
rapture will then, the tribulation will then start at seven years at the end of
time.
You can probably tell that I don't agree with that view by now.
Now, the other two views concerning the eschatology of the book of Revelation are
the historicist view.
Historicism is the belief that biblical prophecies about the little horn,
the man of sin, the Antichrist, the beast, and the Babylonian harlot of
Revelation 17 all apply to the developing history and tribulations of Christianity,
culminating at the end of time.
Historicism sees these prophecies as having a direct application to papal Rome,
as a system whose doctrines are actually a denial of the New Testament message of
free salvation by grace, through simple faith in Jesus Christ, apart from works.
Historicism was the primary prophetic viewpoint of the Protestant reformers.
And, I mean, just looking at the Wikipedia article of it, there's hardly anything
about it when you're looking at the Wikipedia article for the book of
Revelation, which I find to be quite amusing.
There's lots about the other two, but when it comes to historicism,
it says, well, no one really believes in this anymore.
Maybe the Rastafarians or the Seventh-day Adventists or something like that.
And the final view, the final way of interpreting the book of Revelation,
is called the spiritual or the ideal view.
Of course, this is so spiritual, but it believes that the book of
Revelation is just very ethereal, and it applies to every single day of our
lives.
I've heard descriptions of this view, particularly from one liberal Anglican
vicar, who seemed to hold to this view because he didn't really have a good
answer.
And his actual answer was, well, let's just try and make the book of
Revelation happen every day.
At which point I thought this man clearly hasn't read the book of Revelation.
Of course, this is all in spite of the fact that the book of Revelation says that
it is a prophecy.
They just choose to ignore that bit for convenience sake, I suppose.
So of the three sensible interpretations of the revelation, two of these have been
developed by the Jesuits.
They are corrupt fruit from a corrupt tree.
And why were they developed?
For the purpose of disguising the papacy from being identified as the Antichrist.
The motivation behind them is not inspired by God's Holy Spirit, whichever way you
examine the facts.
This all sounds very familiar now.
How could this possibly succeed, you might ask?
Arminianism, fed to the Protestants by the Jesuits.
And that's taken over, you could say.
Futurism, fed to the Protestants by the Jesuits.
Taken over, you could very well argue.
The Puritan Thomas Brightman expressed much the same around the year 1600.
He writes, but mine anger and indignation burst out against the Jesuits.
For when I had by chance light upon Ribera, who made a commentary on this same
holy revelation.
Is it even so, said I, do the papists take heart again?
So as that book, which of a long time before they would scarce suffer any man to
touch, they dare now take in hand to entreat fully upon?
Now they dare be bold and dare to proclaim to the world that any other thing rather
is pointed at in that than their Pope of Rome?
It was so obvious, and in truth it still is, that the papacy is the Antichrist.
But it shocked Brightman to think that the Jesuits actually thought they could get
away with just kicking up a smokescreen and hoping people would just forget about
the papacy.
And yet this is exactly what has happened.
Most of Christianity today holds to Arminianism, sent out by the Jesuits to
destroy the belief in the doctrines of grace.
And so many Christians hold to the futurist interpretation of revelation that
was sent out by the Jesuits to misdirect attention from the Pope.
But what of the fruits?
Well, let's examine them.
Arminianism was popularized by John Wesley, who founded Methodism in the
1700s.
And he also despised the doctrines of grace.
A bit like Erasmus in that sense, I suppose.
Yet he is frequently held up as a hero.
John Wesley taught baptismal regeneration.
Just read page 15 of the works of the Reverend John Wesley.
And he also taught perfectionism and a whole host of other heresies.
Please see the link in the description box for a sufficient list of the heresies he
taught and expanding on them.
But worst of all is the placing of one's salvation in the hands of the sinner.
I'll just quote him now.
This decree whereby whom God did foreknow, he did predestinate, was indeed from
everlasting.
This whereby all who suffer Christ to make them alive are elect according to the
foreknowledge of God.
I'll just repeat that.
This whereby all who suffer Christ to make them alive are elect according to the
foreknowledge of God.
That's also in the works of the Reverend John Wesley.
But you see, that's not what the scriptures say.
It's not, oh I'll go on then, I'll suffer Jesus to make me alive.
We are dead in our sin.
The scriptures tell us that we have absolutely no interest in God whatsoever.
We're his absolute enemy.
It's not like just picking a different flavour of ice cream.
Oh go on then, I'll just choose Jesus.
The Lord says that he chooses us, not the other way around.
I'd just like to quote some scriptures for you now.
In Romans 3.11, it says that there is none that understandeth, there is none that
seeketh after God.
No one.
You see, because faith is a gift from God according to Ephesians 2.8.
It can be no other way.
In 1 Corinthians 2.14, it says, but the natural man receiveth not the
things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know
them, because they are spiritually discerned.
And we are told just a few verses before that we can only have understanding by the
moving of God's Holy Spirit.
We can only receive that by believing.
According to the scriptures, it can be no other way but that God saves us.
Truly it is Almighty God that saves whom he wills.
As the Lord Jesus Christ said in John 6.44, no man can come to me except the
Father which hath sent me draw him, and I will raise him up at the last day.
John Wesley and his Arminian tree of Methodism only served to further the cause
outlined by the Jesuits as I presented.
Following on from Arminianism, we then see Futurism, and particularly
dispensational and made popular by John Nelson Darby of the Plymouth Brethren in
the 1800s.
Also Edward Irving, the acknowledged forerunner of both the Pentecostal and the
Charismatic movements, accepted but the one-man Antichrist idea of Bellarmine and
Ribera.
Yet he went a step further.
Somewhere around 1830, Edward Irving began to choose the unique idea of a two-phase
return of Christ.
The first phase being a secret rapture prior to the rise of the Antichrist.
Sorry, for more information on that, just please follow the link on screen or
in the description box.
I really do advise everyone to research these matters, please.
And then this was all picked up by Schofield for his version of the Bible.
Anyway, this is all a very brief synopsis of what happened throughout history since
the Reformation, but I assure you that when you actually examine the facts in
more depth, you begin to see the very definite influence of Rome.
I strongly recommend reading the article on Futurism, which I've also posted a link
to.
So this is exactly what happens when you allow a little leaven in.
And this is exactly why the Lord Jesus Christ warned us so explicitly.
The 1800s also saw the rise of cults that now have so many people in the world
deceived, such as Seventh-day Adventism, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons.
Many of them with doctrines that grip people so deeply, like large thorns dug
into their flesh, so that even if they do escape the cult, they're wounded and
grieved with the pain for quite some time.
May God help them.
Yet even though they might recognize the Pope as the Antichrist, hold to the
Historicist view of the Revelation, and claim to seek out all truth,
as the Seventh-day Adventists do, their foundation is the sand of staunch
Arminianism.
And without it, the false prophecy rightly collapses.
The false doctrines of Arminianism and Futurism, and the other unbiblical
foolishness that follow, fed to the professing Church by the Devil,
are the reason for the division and the abundance of false doctrines, so-called
denominations, and carnal Christianity that we see today.
Now, I'm presenting this information to you as a call for discernment.
I'm crying out to you, as men have done in times past, in the name of the one true
God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, that you may examine the things that I've
said by the Scriptures, and in counsel with our Father.
I pray that his rushing wind would blow away the chaff and all of the fog that has
blinded Jesus Christ's sheep, and that a fire would burn in our hearts for the
truth, that we may worship him in spirit and in truth.
I used to be obsessed, almost, with these different conspiracy theories
concerning the Illuminati, who's really controlling the world, what's really going
on.
But you know, the Bible has the answers, and the Bible tells us that the devil is
the God, lowercase g, of this world.
And he is trying to run the show, he is trying to conquer things.
But within Christianity, we must understand that one day there's going to
come a separation of the sheep and the goats.
And that the devil is constantly trying to undermine Christianity.
It's not outside of Christianity, it's within.
He's trying to corrupt all that is good, all that is called good.
And it's happening today, we mustn't be ignorant of it.
To conclude, I'd like to read Michael Bunker's conclusion to an article
entitled, The Ultimate Conspiracy.
Loyola's plan has come to fruition.
The Jesuit doctrines of anti-grace have become the dominant teaching of the
churches of the world.
The woman that rides the beast, that mother of harlots, has seen her
offspring grow up into maturity.
The whore churches that dot every street corner have the stench of their mother.
Those people who are not brain-addled and stupefied in the sugar-water harlot
churches are busy decrying the evil of the coming new world order, while in ignorance
they embrace the very doctrines of antichrist.
It is the ultimate conspiracy, and if it were possible, it would deceive
even the very elect.
Do Catholics go to heaven?
You better find out, because odds are you are one.