In June of 1864, the war between the states was entering its final year.
And one of the main thoughts that occupied President Abraham Lincoln's mind was the
part played by Rome in the war.
Lincoln said repeatedly, This war would never have been possible without the
sinister influence of the Jesuits.
We owe it to Potpourri that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her
noblest sons.
This seems to be a strange statement by President Lincoln, considering what is
taught today about the war between the states.
Nothing is ever mentioned of a religious element in the war, or that the Pope and
the Jesuit order were intimately involved.
But Lincoln was not the only voice raised in opposition to the Pope's meddling in
the affairs of this country at that time.
Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse Code, traveled to Europe and Rome in 1830 to do
his own investigation into the conspiracies hatched against America.
After returning home to the United States, Morse wrote two books warning Americans of
the threat from Rome.
Morse would continue sounding the alarm throughout the 1800s and went to discuss
the situation with Lincoln after his inauguration.
Samuel Morse, of course, is the inventor of Morse Code.
It was used for many, many years.
And Samuel Morse wrote a book called Foreign Conspiracies Against the Liberties
of the United States.
It was published in 1835, and he shows in that book that the Holy Alliance and the
Leupold Foundation out of Austria, controlled by the Jesuits, and the Jesuits
themselves were the agents to overthrow the liberties of the United States,
the Federal Republic of the United States, and to replace it with a papal centralized
government as the Vatican is run.
But today, one looks around us to see U.S.
presidents and congressmen and women groveling before the Pope.
Lincoln's words would seem ironic.
Consider this also.
In April 2008, the President of the United States, George W.
Bush, rushed out to meet the Pope at his plane.
Does this not seem to be odd behavior?
For the first time in history, a U.S.
president went out to meet a religious leader, or for that matter, any leader,
upon his entry into the U.S.
No president in the entire history of the United States has ever greeted a foreign
diplomat like that.
Ever.
They wait until they're brought into Washington or something.
They don't go out on the tarmac.
This is a first.
What makes this even more egregious is that the current Pope is a former head of
the Office of Inquisition and a former member of the Nazi party in his youth.
You know that Cardinal Ratzinger was the grand inquisitor of the Vatican before he
became Pope Benedict.
You're aware of that.
I assume other people are not aware of that.
For a Jew, the Inquisition has such awful, awful memories.
And we are inviting the head of the Inquisition to the Jewish state.
I gave a lecture yesterday, and these are the points that I brought up.
You don't invite the grand inquisitor to Israel.
It's that simple.
How did we go from a nation on the alert against the Pope and the Jesuits' desire
to bring America down to one of accepting them as friends?
Simply put, we have sold out.
It has not gone unnoticed that several Protestant presidents have attended Mass
and taken communion at Catholic churches.
Since one cannot take communion at a Roman Catholic service if one is not Catholic,
several presidents have misled their supporters into thinking they are
Protestant when they are not.
Furthermore, those in power are often Roman Catholics outright, so it is
expected that they will obey orders from the Pope.
From U.S.
presidents to kings and queens to religious leaders throughout the world,
those in power meet the Pope and bow down to him.
Even when President Obama went to the Vatican in July 2009 to discuss the world
economic situation, he too bowed to the Pope.
Upon leaving, President Obama said, We look forward to a very strong
relationship between our two countries.
It is important to remember these words of President Obama and what they mean.
The Pope is not just a spiritual ruler.
He is a territorial ruler.
The name of his country since 1929 is Vatican City.
The Pope is a monarchy.
Actually, according to various books, the Pope is the monarch of the world.
Not just a religious leader, he is actually a political leader.
The Vatican is actually a small area over in Rome whereby the Pope is the ruler of
that small area.
The actual name Vatican I found very interesting.
It actually means worship of the divine serpent.
So we find that the very basis of the Vatican, the very word itself,
means the worship of serpents.
But from Rome's perspective, the Pope rules over more than Vatican City.
He rules over the earth both spiritually and materially, or temporally.
According to the Roman Catholic teaching, the Pope can keep you out of heaven.
And he has absolute authority over you on earth.
And when I speak of the Pope, I speak of the papacy, that the papacy claims its two
powers.
Its first power is universal spiritual power over all individuals.
That every person must be subject to the spiritual power of the Pope.
That there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, which is the doctrine of
the Council of Trent as reaffirmed in the documents of Vatican II of the 1960s.
It's still in the books of canon law.
And the other power of the Pope, which is the second key, as you see the
two keys in the Pope's flag with the triple crown.
Lord of heaven, Lord of earth, Lord of hell.
And the two keys, spiritual power.
And the second key is the temporal power.
And the temporal power is this, that the Pope believes he has the right to
rule the government.
The civil government of every nation.
That temporal power has never been denied, it's never been disclaimed.
But there is no question that the Pope wields both swords.
Both a spiritual sword that the public sees, as well as a political sword,
which most people do not see.
So it is very interesting and unsettling to those who love freedom and the right to
worship God as one sees fit, to see our leaders submitting to the Pope of Rome.
Now let us revisit Lincoln's words.
We have discussed the Popes and the papacy, but what about the other group
Lincoln mentioned?
He spoke of the sinister influence of the Jesuits.
Who are the Jesuits?
Jesuits are a group of people that were raised up right around 1535, 1540.
Their leader was Ignatius Loyola.
They basically had two purposes.
One purpose was to destroy the Protestant Reformation.
Because as you remember, Martin Luther had appeared at the Diet of Worms in 1521,
stood before Charles V and the Holy Roman Empire.
And so the Catholic Church sought to stop the Protestant Reformation that Luther
began.
And they could not do it.
And so about 20 years after Luther stood at the Diet of Worms, the Jesuit Order was
created.
And one of their purposes was to destroy every vestige of the Protestant
Reformation, both in the religious realm, in the political realm, and in the
economic realm.
Because the Protestant Reformation not only affected the religious arena,
it also affected the political and the economic arenas as well.
That was one goal of the Jesuit Order.
The other aspect was to restore the supremacy and dominance of the Pope
throughout the world.
The Jesuit Order has directed popes concerning policy, both foreign and
domestic, since 1540.
In particular, since the Council of Trent.
The Council of Trent, indeed.
It started in 1545.
It went for the next 18 years.
That doesn't mean that they stayed there for 18 years.
They met in different places.
But over that period of time, the various leaders of the Catholic Church and the
newly formed Jesuit Order would come together from time to time and discuss how
the Catholic Church would respond to the teachings of the Protestant Reformation.
Would they accept them, or would they completely reject them?
So the doctrines that were being championed at the Reformations,
the doctrines of grace, justification by grace through faith, justification by
faith alone, sola scriptura, only the scriptures, by grace alone through faith
alone, etc.
etc.
No baptismal regeneration, that there is only salvation in Christ, that we do not
participate in our salvation, it's not a joint effort of man and God, etc.
etc.
All the doctrines championed by the Reformers were absolutely accursed and
condemned and reprobated by the Council of Trent that the Jesuits really oversaw from
1545 to 1563.
It was an 18-year council in the town of Trent, Italy, and that is the foundation
of what we call the Counter-Reformation.
And the Council of Trent laid out the focal point, the direction that the
Catholic Church would go for the next four centuries.
Basically at the Council of Trent they decided that tradition and what the Church
Fathers of the Catholic Church taught would continue to be the sole authority in
the Catholic Church.
Now of course there's other aspects of that, other teachings that branch off from
that, but that is the basic sum of the Council of Trent, that tradition would
still rule the Catholic Church.
The anathemas that they have come out with that came from the Council of Trent to
destroy heretics, to destroy those who would uphold the Word of God, who still
live today.
That's correct.
The papacy has not rescinded any of the curses set forth in the Council of Trent.
In fact, the Council of Trent ends and says, Accursed be all heretics!
Accursed!
Every pope has to swear to uphold the Council of Trent.
And if you read the documents of Vatican II, put together by Abbott, it shows you
right there that every pope must swear to uphold the Council of Trent, even though
in the 60s when they were calling heretics separated brethren, with that delusion and
illusion, they still did uphold the Council of Trent, as well as all the
former papal bulls condemning heretics and calling for kings to kill them out of
their dominions, like the Doctrines of Pius IV.
The head of the Jesuits is the Superior General of the Order.
He is called the Black Pope.
The head of the Jesuit Order is the Black Pope.
The man who is currently there, he was just recently elected, Nicholas
Adolphus.
The Black Pope is the head of the Jesuit Order.
He is called the Black Pope not because he is of African origin, but because he is in
the dark.
We see the White Pope, we see Pope Benedict XVI, because he is visible and
all the world knows who he is.
But the Black Pope remains in the dark, behind the scenes, and so few people know
he even exists.
But that is why he is called the Black Pope, and he is the one who heads the
Jesuit Order.
There is an ongoing war against anyone who resists the power of the Pope.
And this war is directed by the Jesuits.
This war is not waged openly by the Jesuits.
The Society of Jesus moves in the shadows.
They infiltrate and get others to do the dirty work of assassination.
If armed conflict is needed, they use the army of one nation to bring a disobedient
nation to its knees.
The Jesuits would do that very thing.
They were very intelligent.
They are still very intelligent people.
What they would do is they would infiltrate.
They did it through economics, through the merchants.
They would then come in and start teaching.
They were very wise people.
They would then infiltrate not only into schools, but they then would infiltrate
into local government and then rise up to higher government officials.
We find that repeatedly in the book by Avril Manhattan called Vietnam,
Why Did We Go?
Where he talks about how they followed this exact plan throughout Southeast Asia.
They did it in Japan.
They did it in China.
They did it in Korea.
They did it in Vietnam.
They did it all along the Pacific Rim.
Well, eventually what would happen, you would have created Catholic cities
where all the people in towns would become Catholics.
Well, they would then try to put their Catholic ideals onto the major religious
populace of a country.
In the Far East, of course, the major religious populace would be the Buddhists.
So these Catholics in these countries, these converts to Catholicism,
they would try to push their Catholicism on their Buddhist friends.
And when the Buddhist friends rejected it, the Catholics would start to use force.
Well, then the Buddhists would appeal to the local governments, the state
governments, the national governments, and then there would be revolution.
It got so bad in Japan that in 1639, the Japanese emperor, he said,
no more Catholics, no more Europeans will come to our island again.
And that ban stayed there for almost two centuries.
This happened throughout the Far East and in other countries throughout the world.
Billy Graham, he didn't protest towards the latter part of his life.
For the first part, I think he was solid when he first started.
But along around the early 60s, his voice was silenced.
Robert Shuler, Paul Crouch, Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson, James Dobson, all of these
men, they're not protesting.
What they have become is our agents, agents of Rome.
I remember back when I was starting my student teaching.
I was teaching seventh grade history to young people talking about the pilgrims
and Puritans coming over to America.
The book said absolutely nothing about why they were coming to America.
And I was just reading and I've got a book here called the Rothschild Money Trust.
And also a book about the Rockefellers, The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen.
But these people have set up trusts and they have rewritten the history books.
They have rewritten the history books.
So that the seventh grade history book that I was teaching out of said nothing
about the reformations.
We have to remember that the papacy, specifically the Black Pope, controls all
high level Freemasonry.
That includes the Pope's Masonic Jewish Zionist running his kingdom of Jerusalem.
That includes the top Freemasons in this country.
Especially the temple there in Washington D.C.
That includes all of your big evangelists.
For example, Billy Graham is a 33rd degree Freemason.
Now I know the Billy Graham organization denies that, but it's still the truth.
Because we know according to the honest 33rd degree Freemason who was truly
converted to Christ.
He was saved by the grace of God.
His name was Jim Shaw.
When he was inducted into the order of the 33rd degree in Washington D.C.
He said there were two former presidents there on that council.
One of them was Gerald Ford, a 33rd degree Freemason, pardon Nixon.
And the other was Jimmy Carter, a 33rd degree Freemason.
So there they are at the grand council.
Another one was an international evangelist, which he later told others
that it was Billy Graham.
Because the publisher refused to put Billy Graham's name in there.
So Billy Graham was there.
So Billy Graham is nothing more than the high level Masonic shill for the papacy.
Which is also fraught with Freemasons if you read the book In God's Name by David
Yalop.
And so we talk about Robert Shuler for example.
Robert Shuler is another 33rd degree Freemason.
He went to Rome to get the Pope's blessing to build his crystal cathedral.
And Robert Shuler is a personal friend of the anti-white, hateful racist Louis
Farrakhan.
Who is another high level Freemason who runs the Nation of Islam for the
Archbishop of Chicago.
So we have all these high level Masonic leaders, black and white, of all these
various different religions.
Working together for agitation among the peoples of this country.
But never ever exposing the papacy as the true heart and soul and its real master.
All of this sounds incredible.
It becomes less so when one examines the oath of the Jesuits.
We have to understand that these men have died to their own self-will.
It's something a Christian should do.
That's the way we should be.
We have no life anymore.
Our life is we're dead with Christ and we're hidden God with him.
When Christ is revealed who is our life, then we shall be revealed with him in
glory.
We need to learn to die to ourselves and count our lives as nothing.
But our only purpose is to do the will of our master.
And when he's finished with us, then let us die.
The Jesuits have done this, but they do it for the devil.
And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities.
And upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told.
There's no such thing as a disobedient Jesuit.
They're all under orders.
They've been trained for 15 years.
They're soldiers.
They're more of a Marine Corps than the Marines.
The Marines were fashioned after the Jesuit order.
You break the man down in boot camp.
You rob him of his personality.
You shave his head.
You put all the same clothes on him.
They're all treated the same.
They're treated like dirt.
We're going to rob you of your will so that we can mold you into what we want
you.
That's all Jesuit.
So, this is how they think.
And given the order, they will kill you, me, themselves, their mother.
Anything they're ordered to do, that is what they will do.
We're going to bring down 9-11 today, gentlemen.
Okay, given the order, what we do, what button we push, do I need to be
inside, outside, what is it?
And that's what they'll do.
We need to bring down the Pentagon today.
We need to blow up Arizona and Pearl Harbor in 1941.
Okay, I'll be there.
What's my orders?
They're all under orders.
And this is why you can have no country with a Jesuit presence in it.
They have to be expelled.
And all their agents that they work through must be expelled.
And this is exactly what Czar Alexander I did in 1820.
He kicked out all the Jesuits out of Russia.
In 1822, he shut down all the Masonic lodges.
And in 1825, he was poisoned.
So, this is the Jesuit mindset, and we have to...
We should read the spiritual exercises.
We should read some of their works.
We need to read the Jesuit Doctrines of Regicide.
How it's no murder to kill a heretic.
How it's okay to lie, cheat, and steal.
How it's okay to kill your enemy.
How it's okay to kill a woman that you commit adultery with.
If she should want to tell on you, you can kill her.
It's all right in there in their canon law.
It's okay to steal.
The whole world is their candy shop, where they can steal everything they can
get their hands on, to consolidate it under the power of the Jesuit order.
And if that means killing kings or sinking ships, even if it causes their own death,
they do it for the greater glory of God, and the joy of their glory.
When a Jesuit priest is elevated to a position of high command, he has
administered what is called the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction.
This oath has been called the Fourth Vow, or the Blood Oath, given to those in the
Society of Jesus besides the traditional vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience.
A copy of the Extreme Oath can be found in the Congressional Record.
I want to read a statement to you, which is the Jesuit Oath.
It says, this is the Jesuit Oath.
I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own,
that's from the spiritual exercises of Loyola, or any mental reservation,
whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and
every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope.
I furthermore promise and declare that I will make and wage relentless war,
as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate Protestants and liberals from
the face of the whole earth.
I will neither spare age, sex, or condition.
I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these
infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their
infants' heads against the wall, in order to annihilate forever their
execrable race.
And then it goes on.
The point being, throughout the history of the Jesuit Order, they will shoot,
they will burn, they will flay, they will do whatever it takes to destroy
anybody who stands in the way of what they want to do.
In 2009, the Jesuit General was confronted about the oath.
One of the things in your Jesuit High Oath, I think it is, it says something
about, furthermore, you promise to declare that we will, at the first opportunity,
seek war, at any opportunity, against heretics, Protestants, liberals.
See here?
And that you will spare neither age, nor sex, nor condition, and I will hang,
waste, boil, flay...
You've never seen this before?
Strangle, bury alive?
It's horrible!
And I was like, look, it's in the Congressional Record.
Thank you very much.
Thank you for coming.
Does the oath and activities of the Jesuit reflect anything Christian?
Or is it, as Jesus said, Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's
clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
What else do we know about the Jesuits?
They have been thrown out of 83 countries over the last 500 years.
That is correct.
83 countries have physically removed them.
And why was it necessary to remove them?
In a word, power.
The Jesuits have throughout history sought to take over and control every country in
which they reside.
Since their beginning in 1540, the Jesuits' power grew until they
controlled the papacy, the Roman Catholic Church, and many of the governments of the
world.
In 1773, all of that changed.
One by one, countries began to expel the Jesuits from their borders.
This culminated in the suppression or abolishment of the Jesuits in 1773.
In that year, Pope Clement XIV officially disbanded the order forever.
This providential act enabled a nation based on religious liberty to be formed,
the United States of America.
At the same time in history as the Jesuits were suppressed, the American Revolution
occurred.
Many believe this was no accident but an act of God.
I see the suppression of the Jesuits as providential because without the
suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no successful American
Revolution, period.
We have to understand that the Protestants and the Baptists of Europe had been
persecuted in excess of 200 years, crying out to the Lord for some place to
live where they could worship him and seek his face and be obedient to his word.
But nothing else was more important to them than that.
And so as a result, the Lord answered their prayers and opened up North America
to them in the 1600s, but ultimately to get a government that would protect them
in their rights, freedom of worship, freedom of press, freedom of conscience,
freedom of self-defense, and what came to be the American Bill of Rights and of
course the U.S.
Constitution.
So without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no escape for us out of
Europe into North America to start a free nation where we can worship God according
to the dictates of our conscience.
As the Americans were determining and setting up a constitution where Protestant
principles would reign, where freedom of religion would reign, where people would
have the right to bear arms, where people would have a right to a fair trial,
where all of these principles are being laid down, the Jesuit order is abolished.
If the Jesuit order had not been abolished in 1773, and as they watched a Protestant
country rising up in the Western Hemisphere, the Jesuit order would have
used not only England, who they did use in the American Revolution, they would have
used France, they would have used Spain, they would have used Portugal,
because those were all Catholic countries.
They would have used all those countries to destroy this growing Protestant nation.
And it would never have been established.
Having had their power and influence greatly diminished, the Jesuits were
unable to stop the American colonies from establishing a Protestant Republic.
That is to say, the Jesuits were in no condition to coordinate a crusade against
the new Protestant Republic as they had done with England in 1588 by using the
Spanish Armada.
But the Jesuits had one ace in the hole.
Many of the founding fathers were deists and Freemasons.
They attended church services and publicly paid homage to the God of the Bible.
But in reality, they did not believe in miracles or the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Their God was the great architect of the universe, not the God of the Bible.
Thomas Jefferson went so far as to create his own Bible by cutting out verses he
agreed with and pasting them into a blank book.
The verses Jefferson believed in were those where Jesus speaks of morality and
loving others.
Miracles such as the virgin birth or Jesus' resurrection were omitted since
they were considered fables.
Freemasons like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine had little regard for the
divine, miracle-working Jesus of the Bible.
Thomas Paine, author of the famous pamphlet Common Sense, wrote a book called
The Age of Reason.
In it, Paine says,
His historians, having brought him into the world in a supernatural manner,
were obliged to take him out again in the same manner.
Thus, when it came time to create a document that would unite these colonies
into one country, the Jesuits had an idea many preferred.
It was called religious liberty.
The First Amendment to the Constitution would allow all religions to exist in
America, not just religions based on the Protestant Bible.
In the new American Republic, Roman Catholicism was allowed to coexist with
the Protestant denominations as well as the deistic Freemasons.
But most importantly, the Roman Catholics were allowed to vote just like any other
citizens.
This was key, as we shall see later on.
For as their numbers increased, Roman Catholics could put in power other
Roman Catholics, or those who were sympathetic to them, and change the nation
from within.
After the Revolutionary War, voting rights of Catholics did change.
We know that one of the signers of the Constitution was a Roman Catholic.
There was only one, Mr. Carroll.
But nonetheless, it made it look like a place for Roman Catholics to come,
as well as Protestants, to have religious liberty, which is absurd.
The Roman Catholic people had been used by the priests to kill us for centuries,
and so why not stay in Europe?
Well, they were being used by the Jesuits to come here, to ultimately then take over
political power, and then submit North America to the feet of the Pope.
Turning from the happenings with the American colonies, let us take a moment to
investigate what the Jesuits were up to in Europe after their suppression.
As we might guess, the Jesuits were not idle.
They decided to seek revenge against those who had turned on them, specifically a
traitorous Pope and the Catholic monarchs of Europe.
In 1774, a year after the Jesuits were disbanded forever...
Pope Clement XIV had suppressed the Jesuits, and a short time later,
he was poisoned.
Poison is a big thing with these guys.
Pope Clement stated, Alas, I knew they would poison me, but I did not expect to
die in so slow and cruel a manner.
A post-mortem examination of his body revealed the presence of a poison.
Thus, the Jesuits rid themselves of a troublesome Pope.
The vendetta on the Catholic monarchs of Europe was approached in a less obvious
manner.
Cleverly, the Jesuits determined not to act in their own name, but decided to work
through front groups and to have them take the blame for their revenge.
In this way, the Jesuits would continue to appear to be disbanded and innocent of any
involvement in the matter.
The first front group the Jesuits used was called the Illuminati.
The Illuminati was organized in Bavaria by a Jesuit professor, Adam Weishaupt,
on May 1, 1776, just three years after the Jesuits were disbanded.
Many sources only casually mention that Weishaupt was a former Jesuit,
and they usually state he was an ex-Jesuit.
In reality, Weishaupt never left the order.
As for the order itself, it never was truly disbanded.
In Bavaria, when the Illuminati was founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt,
Weishaupt was used by the Jesuits then to continue the work of the Jesuit order
under another name.
Weishaupt never repudiated the Jesuits.
That's a lie of many, many conspiratorial historians controlled by the Pope.
They want to create this dichotomy between the Illuminati and the Jesuits.
Never fall for it.
Weishaupt was operating under orders from a superior, Ritchie at the time was the
general, then later another superior.
Weishaupt then enters into an alliance with the House of Rothschild.
So now we see the Rothschilds, the Jewish Rothschilds, Red Shield,
become the bankers for the Jesuit order during the upheaval we will know as the
French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars.
So this alliance between the Jesuits and the House of Rothschild, these high level
Masonic Jews, is very important to realize at this point because we have to live with
it and deal with it today.
Also Bavaria is the stronghold of the Jesuits.
There was a huge inquisitional torture chamber there in Nuremberg.
Interesting that the Nuremberg Trials of the Nazis would be held there.
And the very principles of the Illuminati, the way the organization was run,
it's the very principles of the Jesuit order.
And that's found in Nesta Webster's book called Secret Societies.
In 1814, François Charles de Burkheim reported on Germany's secret societies and
stated, The oldest and most dangerous association is that which is generally
known under the denomination of the Illumines, and of which the foundation
goes back towards the middle of the last century.
Bavaria was its cradle.
It is said that it had for founders several chiefs of the order of the
Jesuits.
Through the Illuminati, the Jesuits sought to take over various powerful secret
societies, especially the higher degrees of Freemasonry.
If you study all of the different organizations in the world, whether it be
the Knights of Malta, the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign
Relations, as you study all these different groups, and the Knights of Malta
would be included in that, you find that they are like a buffer behind which the
Jesuit order operates.
In his book, Proofs of a Conspiracy, John T.
Robison wrote concerning the Masonic Lodges.
At this time, 1798, the Jesuits interfered considerably, insinuating themselves into
the lodges.
Robison went on to say, This society is well known to have put on every shape and
to have made use of every mean that could promote the power and influence of the
order, and we know that at this time they were by no means without hopes of
re-establishing the dominion of the Church of Rome in England.
And with the Illuminati and the higher orders of Freemasonry, the Jesuits
fomented the destruction of the very monarchs who had opposed them,
beginning with the French Revolution and later with Napoleon Bonaparte.
The French Revolution was launched and waged by the Jesuits, using Grand Orient
Freemasonry and Scottish Rite Freemasonry in England, for the purpose of punishing
the Roman Catholic monarchs of Europe, taking back the Vatican Empire from the
Pope, tearing away the colonies from England, Protestant England.
They were doing several things at one time.
Remember, the Jesuits are the great Hegelians.
They can think along 10, 20, 50 different lines at the same time and coordinate them
all together.
So to understand what we do, we have to think dialectically.
We can never think linearly.
So the purpose of the French Revolution, first and foremost, was to punish the
Roman Catholic monarchs of Europe.
And that they did.
What happened?
Why they beheaded Louis XVI, the grandson of Louis XV.
We're going to teach you Bourbons of France who you mess with when you suppress
the Jesuits.
And then we're going to behead his wife, Marie Antoinette.
And she was the daughter of Maria Theresa.
She was a Habsburg.
So we're going to punish you Habsburgs.
You suppress us, we're going to cut off the head of Marie Antoinette, using our
Jacobins.
And then you Braganzas of Portugal, we're going to drive you into exile using
Napoleon.
And they did.
They had to go into South America.
And you Bourbons of Spain, we're going to drive you into exile too.
We're going to have Napoleon set up a little banana republic up here in Spain.
And then you Knights of Malta, how dare you kick us off your island of
Malta in 1768.
We're going to teach you a lesson.
So they took Napoleon down here with his huge fleet.
Took all the treasures of the Knights of Malta and took all their weapons so that
they could use that in the invasion of Egypt.
At which time the Jesuits used Napoleon to kill all the Mamluks, the bodyguard of the
Caliph of Egypt.
So now they're waging war against Islam like they are today.
When Napoleon's usefulness came to an end, the Jesuits had him betray his soldiers in
a war with Russia.
Like many of the founding fathers of America, the French soldiers were very
nationalistic.
And they would be a problem in the future plans of the Jesuits.
After his defeat in Russia, Napoleon was forced to abdicate.
Working in the shadows, the Jesuits made sure he was kept in reserve should he be
needed.
So Napoleon was sent to the island of Elba and given an annual pension of two million
francs.
Then, on August 7, 1814, the unthinkable occurred.
Pope Pius VII restored the Jesuit order.
The Jesuits were revived in 1814 with the papal bull by Pope Pius VII, which brought
them back into existence.
The suppression of the Jesuits was to last forever.
It only lasted 41 years.
Former U.S.
President John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1816 about the rebirth of the
Jesuits and the danger they posed to America.
Adams stated plainly,
Only a king of the gypsies can assume?
Dressed as painters, publishers, writers, and schoolmasters?
I have lately read Pascal's letters over again, and four volumes of the history of
the Jesuits.
If ever any congregation of men could merit eternal perdition on earth and in
hell, it is this company of Loyola.
Jefferson replied back to Adams,
It means a step backward from light into darkness.
Coincidentally, the restoration of the order occurred one month before the first
meeting of the Congress of Vienna in 1814.
The Jesuits were deeply involved in this meeting.
When the monarchs of Europe began fighting among themselves, the Jesuits manipulated
the circumstances to bring Napoleon back for an encore performance.
The famous Hundred Days.
The monarchs gathered in Vienna came to terms quickly in order to meet this
renewed threat.
The Jesuits' careful manipulation of the events being played out like a chess game.
Again, it must be remembered that the Society of Jesus never wanted to do away
with kings.
The Jesuits only wanted to punish those who had suppressed the order.
In March of 1815, nine days after the Congress of Vienna ended, Napoleon led his
patriotic monarchy hating men to defeat by attacking the wrong spot of the British
lines at Waterloo.
The Battle of Waterloo was deliberately lost by Napoleon as explicated by our
great Southern General Thomas Jonathan Stonewall Jackson when he reviewed the
battlefield.
And you can find this in Dabney's great work, his biography that he wrote on
Stonewall Jackson called The Life and Times of Stonewall Jackson.
And when Jackson went there, he said, Napoleon attacked from the wrong position.
He should have attacked over here.
And that's exactly what happened.
Napoleon deliberately sacrificed his army at Waterloo so that there would be the
least amount of true patriots in France to resist the return of King Louis XVIII into
France who immediately restored the Jesuits and restored the Inquisition.
Having no further need of Napoleon, the Jesuits made sure he was sent far away
to the island of St. Helena in the South Atlantic.
While there, he was poisoned and died in 1821.
In his memoirs, Napoleon maintained his loyalty to the Catholic Church but had
this to say about the Jesuits.
The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order.
Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery.
And the aim of this organization is power, power in its most despotic exercise,
absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition
of a single man.
We have stated that the Jesuits were deeply involved in the Congress of Vienna.
Ostensibly, this meeting of the monarchs of Europe under the direction of the
Jesuits was for the purpose of reorganizing Europe, restoring the balance
of power, and discussing the creation of a federation of Europe.
According to author Burke McCarty, the Congress of Vienna and several other
secret meetings were in reality black conspiracy against popular governments.
After the Constitution is signed, Protestant principles are put in place in
the United States.
You go into the early 1800s, the Napoleonic Wars are being fought in
Europe, in Russia, but finally the Napoleonic Wars have stopped.
All of the monarchs of Europe convene in Vienna, Austria.
The man who headed it was Clemens von Metternich of Austria.
Russia was there, England was there, France was there.
They all came there to Vienna to decide on a big problem in the world.
There were governments of the people, by the people, and for the people that
were being established.
And these monarchs of Europe, and the Pope himself, Pope Pius VII, and the newly
re-established Jesuit order in 1814, they all came together and they said,
if we don't destroy these free popular governments, eventually the principles of
those governments will destroy us.
So at the Congress of Vienna, it was voted that they would pursue the destruction of
any free governments in this world.
And in 1814, the one government that was the thorn in their side was the United
States of America.
Eight years after the Congress of Vienna, the same parties met in Verona,
Italy for a second meeting to discuss the United States of America and the threat of
popular governments.
For posterity's sake, on April 25th, 1916, Senator Robert L.
Owen of the United States Congress entered into the Congressional Record the secret
treaty of Verona that was signed by the monarchs of Europe.
These kings of Europe, under the control of the Pope, called themselves the Holy
Alliance.
The first article stated, the high contracting powers engage mutually in the
most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to this system of
representative governments.
The third article gave special thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for
them and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.
Now the Treaty of Verona was an agreement between the Catholic monarchies of Europe
and the Vatican to destroy the concept of representative government worldwide.
Samuel B.
Moore shows conclusively that Metternich and the Jesuit Order and Pope Pius VII,
they all agreed that the way that they would destroy the United States would be
by sending as many Catholic immigrants to the American shores as they possibly
could.
So thousands and thousands of Catholics were sent to the United States.
Thousands and thousands of Catholic priests and many Jesuit co-agitators were
sent to America to take over and destroy this government.
The treaty was signed on November 22, 1822 in Verona, Italy by Metternich of
Austria, Chateaubriand for France, Bernstedt for Prussia, and Nesselrode for
Russia.
After reading the secret treaty, Senator Owens pointed out that the threat
under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular governments in the
American republics is the basis of the Monroe Doctrine.
This secret treaty sets forth clearly the conflict between monarchical government
and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government of
the many.
Because of the congresses at Vienna and Verona in 1814 and 1822, there was an
English statesman who was at both of those meetings.
His name was Lord George Canning.
And in Burke McCarty's book called The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination
of Lincoln, it says in there that George Canning warned the United States
government as to what was going on.
Canning was in contact with a man by the name of John Quincy Adams, who was a
congressman at that time.
He wrote to Adams, he said, the monarchs of Europe, the Pope and the Jesuits are
planning to destroy America.
Quincy Adams took the information to the president at that time, a man by the name
of Jim Monroe.
We know him as James Monroe.
James Monroe took the information, wrote to a former president who was still
alive at that time, the man's name was Tom Jefferson, who was in retirement at
Monticello.
Jefferson wrote back to Monroe and he said, this is the greatest affront to
America since the revolution.
He said, we need to do everything we can to oppose and stop this holy alliance set
up by the monarchs of Europe, the Pope and the Jesuit order.
In his letter to Monroe in 1823, Jefferson said he did not want to pass up
an opportunity of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the
rights of nations by the interference of anyone in the internal affairs of another,
self-legitimously begun by Bonaparte and now continued by the equally lawless
alliance calling itself holy.
America's response to these two congresses was James Monroe's State of the Union
address called the Monroe Doctrine, where he told the powers of Europe,
he said, you stay over there, you fight your wars in Europe, we'll stay over here.
If you ever colonize in the Western Hemisphere, we will consider it an act of
war.
That was the Monroe Doctrine.
But in our history books today, we read nothing of the role of the Pope
and the Jesuit order to destroy America.
Nothing is in our books today to that effect.
But that's why the Monroe Doctrine was written.
To take notes of what was being said for posterity, an English translation appeared
in 1848.
What Leoni heard was no less than the Jesuit plan for world domination and the
destruction of heretics, especially the heretics in Protestant America.
As to the Jesuit plan for world government, you well know that what we aim
at is the empire of the world.
As to their plan for working in secret, let us prefer a secret war, which,
though less brilliant, is more sure to bring us the advantage.
Let us shun too much light.
As to the Pope, also known as the Vicar of Christ, we may say that God designs for
extermination, like the Canaanites, all the nations that obstinately refuse to
enter into the unity of the Church, and that the Vicar of Jesus Christ is
appointed to execute these judgments in due time.
As to Protestant and non-Roman Catholics who do not join Rome, we have,
however, one source of rejoicing.
We cherish at the bottom of our hearts this principle that whatever does not
unite with us must be annihilated.
That Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished.
As to the Bible, then the Bible, that serpent which, with head erect and
eyes flashing fire, threatens us with its venom whilst it trails along the ground,
shall be changed again into a rod as soon as we are able to seize it.
And what wounds will we not inflict with it upon these hardened pharaohs and their
cunning magicians?
The Monroe Doctrine was ratified in 1823.
The Jesuit meeting in Sheri, Italy took place in 1825.
One year later, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day.
Both of these former presidents and defenders of the Constitution died on July
4, 1826.
What are the odds that these two men so critical to the birth of the United States
and enemies of the Holy Alliance, the Vatican, and the Jesuits would die on
the same day?
The day they died was the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of
Independence.
Autopsies were not performed on the former presidents, and it was assumed that they
died of natural causes.
Another strange coincidence would be the death of James Monroe on yet another 4th
of July in 1831.
Monroe left office in 1825 and supposedly died of tuberculosis six years later.
It should be noted that the symptoms associated with arsenic poisoning,
difficulty in breathing, dryness and tightness of the throat, seizures,
and burning pain are similar to those of tuberculosis.
George Morgan commented on these strange circumstances in his book, The Life of
James Monroe.
Morgan states, as John Adams and Thomas Jefferson had died on the 4th five years
before, Monroe's death added to the wonder, as though a power aloft had taken
cognizance of the peculiar patriotism of these mortal men and had translated them.
Is it possible that the power aloft was not from heaven and was not benign?
Perhaps this power was not looking at the nationalism and patriotism of these men
with joy as much as with a vengeful eye, as the Jesuit Oath clearly states.
A Jesuit vows to make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all
heretics, Protestants and liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and
exterminate them from the face of the whole earth.
That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup,
the strangulation cord, the steel of the poignard, or the leaden bullet.
Others have even pointed out George Washington's sudden death in 1799 as very
suspicious.
There is evidence that the Jesuits assassinated a few American presidents
before the war between the states.
The first president they assassinated was George Washington.
He was poisoned with anthrax.
One of his three attending physicians was behind that poisoning.
Remember, from the day he took sick to the day he died was a mere two to two and a
half days, according to Headley's great work, The Life of Washington.
So he was murdered.
Why would the Jesuits want to kill George Washington?
Like Jefferson, Adams, and Monroe, Washington was first and foremost a
nationalist and warned against foreign influence.
He promoted a policy of neutrality and the avoidance of European alliances.
Washington repeated his isolationist policy in his farewell address that was
published in newspapers throughout the country.
Washington wrote,
Besides this admonition to avoid foreign alliances, Washington loudly declared
America should keep itself free from foreign influence.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me,
fellow citizens, the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake.
In addition to these publicly expressed opinions, Washington had acted swiftly to
put down the Jacobin-inspired Whiskey Rebellion in 1793 with 15,000 troops.
Instigating the rebellion was the French ambassador Edmond Guenet and the
revolutionary Democratic Clubs that had sprung up in America.
Guenet and the Democratic Clubs were linked to the Jacobin Clubs in France.
In her book, World Revolution, Nesta Webster states,
The Jesuits created the Illuminati and were thus working through the Democratic
Clubs in America.
Washington never realized he was taking on the Jesuits when he crushed the Whiskey
Rebellion.
John Adams became president after Washington left office.
During John Adams' administration, war with Illuminati-controlled France was
averted, but Washington made it known he would not resist a call from Congress to
assume command of the army.
Therefore, Washington endorsed the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts that were
designed to protect the United States from the extensive French Jacobin conspiracy.
It is therefore no wonder that the vengeful eye of the Jesuits was focused on
George Washington.
After leaving office in 1797, Washington lived only two years and nine months.
From the onset of his illness in 1799 to his death was a mere two days.
As with Monroe's death, the symptoms leading up to Washington's death were
difficulty in breathing, tightness of the throat, and burning pain.
Washington was only 67 years old when he died.
Like Jefferson, Adams, and Monroe, there was no autopsy with Washington's
death.
However, the Jesuits made sure they had a servant on hand, Tobias Lear, to carefully
plant the story that Washington had neglected to take off his wet clothes
after coming in from his day of riding about his farms in snowy weather.
Washington had taken cold, undoubtedly, from being so much exposed the day before
and complained of a sore throat.
Lear said this even though Washington explicitly told him that his great coat
had kept him dry.
According to Lear, we are to believe that George Washington, who survived the
hardship of a winter at Valley Forge and other severe winters, did not know how to
take care of himself in bad weather.
The more likely truth is that Washington had opposed the plans and schemes of the
Society of Jesus and was assassinated for his interference.
Other American presidents, both in the 19th and 20th centuries, who would run
afoul of the Jesuit order, would meet untimely deaths.
For instance, the short presidency of William Henry Harrison.
Harrison had been elected president on March 4, 1841.
He would serve as president for only 35 days.
At the end of March, the newly elected president came down suddenly with an
illness and died.
Many thought this was the result of his long inaugural address, which lasted over
two hours in cold weather.
But Harrison had been fine after the speech, and weeks had passed since the
inauguration.
Why was Harrison assassinated?
One only has to go to his inauguration address to find the main reason.
Harrison stated in the fourth paragraph of his speech, We admit of no government by
divine right, believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent creator
has made no distinction amongst men, that all are upon an equality,
and that the only legitimate right to govern is an express grant of power from
the governed.
Like other leaders in the past, Harrison was thumbing his nose against the
Holy Alliance, who practiced the divine right of kings to wield power as
sanctioned by the Pope.
Harrison was also unwilling to accept Texas, a slave territory, into the Union,
which ran against the Jesuit plan of using the slave issue to agitate and divide the
northern states from the southern states.
Unlike Adams, Jefferson, and Monroe, the Jesuits did not wait for the Fourth of
July to eliminate the heretical President Harrison.
Harrison was poisoned at the end of March and died on April 4, 1841.
Vice President John Tyler succeeded Harrison as President.
The annexation of Texas was accomplished in 1845 under the watchful eye of the new
President.
Another President who died suddenly in office was Zachary Taylor.
Taylor was elected President in 1848.
Taylor was a southern slaveholder who did not want to see slavery extended to any
more areas of the country.
Like Washington, Taylor was devoted to the Union of the American states, was very
popular, and was a military man.
Another crisis over slavery occurred by the Jesuits in 1850.
A compromise was being pushed to avert a split in the Union.
Taylor did not like the compromise being worked out in Congress.
On July 4, 1850, Taylor attended the groundbreaking ceremonies for the
Washington Monument.
He was fine upon returning back to the Presidential Mansion.
Then he became ill after eating some raw fruit that some say was a bowl of
cherries.
A violent fever came upon him.
Senator Benton commented that the violent attack commencing soon after his return to
the Presidential Mansion.
Old Ruffin Reddy frustrated his assassins and managed to fight the poison for five
days and avoided the Fourth of July curse.
President Taylor died on July 9.
The Jesuits removed a strong, unifying leader and replaced him with a more
malleable president in Millard Fillmore.
Fillmore signed the compromise in 1850, just two months after Taylor's death.
As the Jesuit agitation of the American states was reaching its climax in the
1850s, a trial occurred in 1855 at a courthouse in Illinois that would bring
two fateful men together.
These two men would join forces to fight the Jesuits.
The first was a rebellious Roman Catholic priest by the name of Charles Cheneque.
The second was a lawyer by the name of Abraham Lincoln.
Charles Cheneque did not approve of the corrupt conduct of many of the priests he
knew.
These evil priests were drunkards, sexually promiscuous, and thieves,
often stealing money and property collected from their parishioners.
The priesthood in Chicago was very corrupt, morally and every other way.
They were drinking heavily.
They would go on these retreats and take up a collection between themselves,
put it all in a pot, and go out and buy a lot of booze.
And they also rented a lot of hookers.
Apparently there was a lot of sexual deviance going on at the time as well.
And he didn't like that, though, and he tried to change it.
He quoted exclusively from the Bible, and his bishop just could not tolerate
that.
The heads of the Roman church wanted Cheneque to ignore these illicit and
illegal activities.
When he did not, Bishop Reagan of Chicago and another priest by the name of LaBelle
arranged to have Cheneque accused of rape.
Cheneque needed a good attorney.
An attorney by the name of Abraham Lincoln was suggested.
Abraham Lincoln had a team of other lawyers under him.
It was like a regular defense team.
Lincoln being one lawyer, a gentleman by the name of Stephen R.
Moore was another lawyer.
And that was a big court case at the time.
It was the most important court case that Lincoln ever had in his entire legal
career, as a matter of fact.
But it's been buried by the Illinois government.
The trial did not go well for Cheneque.
The general feeling was that he would be convicted.
Local newspapers of the time, they speculated that Cheneque was going to be
found guilty.
And that was being broadcast throughout the entire Catholic community at that
time.
Fortunately for Cheneque, a witness came forward for the defense.
Her name was Philomene Schwartz.
Ms. Schwartz had been in Fr.
LaBelle's house the day the plot to frame Cheneque had been concocted.
Schwartz contacted Lincoln and agreed to testify.
She caught the midnight train to Urbana and met up with Abraham Lincoln and
explained to him exactly what happened.
Once Bishop Reagan and Fr.
LaBelle found out about the potential witness, they fled the city.
The prosecution dropped the charges and Cheneque was vindicated.
As they left the courtroom, Charles Cheneque was in tears.
Lincoln says to him, why are you crying Mr. Cheneque?
Your enemies have fled and you are free to go.
And he said, I'm not crying for myself Mr. Lincoln, I'm crying for you.
He said, because I saw no less than 11 Jesuits with the sentence of death on
their face today in this courtroom.
And know for a surety they will kill you for what you have done.
Lincoln says, well, let this be my death warrant.
And he gives Cheneque a bill for a mere $50.
And then Lincoln sobers up and says, it matters not where a man must die,
but that he must die at the post of duty and honor.
Cheneque's words of warning to Lincoln would prove to be true.
The conspiratorial hand of the Jesuits at work.
A conspiracy to further their goal of a world under papal control.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States five years after Charles
Cheneque's trial.
By 1860, agitation between the North and the South was so great that many of the
Southern states decided to leave the Union over Lincoln's election.
This agitation was designed from the beginning to drive a wedge between the
North and the South and bring about a war that would result in the death of
countless Protestants.
Clearing the way for the Jesuits to reconstruct America into a tool of
conquest.
Lincoln had no military background and the perception in the South was that he was
incapable of mounting a war to stop the Southern states from leaving the Union.
However, the Jesuits had studied Lincoln and knew he would be a very effective
leader.
In his own way, Lincoln would serve the Jesuit ends.
Those ends were, one, to kill Protestants who lived mainly in the South.
And two, to undermine the Constitution, especially the doctrines of state
sovereignty and states' rights.
Once in office, Lincoln refused to accept the right of any state to leave the Union.
He also refused to remove the federal troops from Fort Sumter under the command
of Major Robert Anderson, who was a Freemason.
As tensions mounted, the Jesuit-controlled Freemasons on both sides turned the
standoff into a bloody war.
It's no coincidence that General Beauregard, a Roman Catholic Freemason,
fired the first shots at Fort Sumter.
And it's no coincidence that a Presbyterian Protestant Freemason incited
those shots to be fired when he sent down the Star of the West to reinforce Fort
Sumter.
And that was Mason James Buchanan.
James Buchanan started the war when he sent down the Star of the West,
that ship, to reinforce the harbor because the Southern states had lawfully seceded.
If we had a union of consent, and I would like to add here that the three states
that specifically reserved their right to secede in their state ratification papers
were Virginia, Rhode Island, and New York.
And if those three states reserved the right to secede, to withdraw the powers,
the specific powers they had delegated to Washington, then every other state had the
right.
So, the Southern states had the right to secede, the North had no right to stop it.
So therefore an attack against the Southern states who had seceded was an act
of war, and therefore it was indeed a war of Northern aggression against the
Southerners who had rightfully seceded.
As the war progressed, it was obvious that not all was as it appeared to be on the
surface.
Time and again, generals on both sides made blunders and missed opportunities
that would have ended the war sooner rather than later.
The most glaring of these missed opportunities was the First Battle of the
Conflict, the First Battle of Manassas on July 21, 1861.
Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the South by Union troops.
To stop them, Southern forces were moved into position in Virginia under Brigadier
General Joseph E.
Johnston and Brigadier General P.G.T.
Beauregard.
Beauregard had ordered the firing of the first shot at Fort Sumter, and his family
was not only Roman Catholic, but also had Jesuit ties.
During the course of the battle, the Confederate forces were beaten back
until Colonel Thomas J.
Jackson stood his ground against the invading Northern Army.
Stonewall Jackson's heroic stand paved the way for the routing of the invading Union
forces that soon withdrew towards Washington, D.C.
Incredibly, the Southern commanders, Beauregard and Johnston, did not pursue
the defeated Union troops, although prompted by many, including Stonewall
Jackson.
Johnston and Beauregard let the defeated Northern troops escape.
If they had pursued the Northern Army, the South would have annihilated their
enemy and ended the war in a few days.
Along with Johnston and Beauregard, there were other Southern generals who
seemed, at times, to be working against the South.
Take, for instance, the legendary Robert E.
Lee.
It was General Robert E.
Lee who ordered the disastrous Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg on July
3, 1863.
Author and historian Bevan Alexander states, Pickett's Charge was doomed before
it started.
Sending massed bodies of men across nearly a mile of open ground against emplaced
riflemen and banked cannons was simply an invitation for destruction.
Bevan Alexander goes on to say that by insisting on fighting the North at
Gettysburg and ordering Pickett's Charge, Lee had lost well over a third of his army
and had destroyed the last offensive power of the Confederacy.
It was also General Robert E.
Lee who refused to listen to Stonewall Jackson concerning the South's overall
strategy.
Jackson realized that an offensive war against the North would result in the
South's defeat.
No matter how skilled a battle leader Lee was, he could never win the war by pitting
the far weaker resources of the South against the tremendous economic and
military power of the North.
Stonewall Jackson's plan was to avoid the Northern strength, its field armies,
and strike at Northern weakness, its undefended factories, farms,
and railroads.
Jackson wanted to bypass the Union armies and to win indirectly by assaulting the
Northern people's will to pursue the war.
Jackson called this Unrelenting War.
Lee never fully accepted Jackson's view.
However, a Union general named William Tecumseh Sherman did.
Sherman's march from Atlanta to the sea conducting Unrelenting War broke the back
of the South in 1864 and spelled the end of the conflict.
Lee was the one responsible for the defeat of Antietam or Sharpsburg when he left the
Order of 191 there wrapped up in a cigar.
It was found by Yankee generals.
Lee was behind that.
Lee was behind not allowing Jackson to win at least four decisive battles against the
Union forces.
And this is spoken of and written very well in Bevan Alexander's great work,
Lost Victories.
It is also worthy to note this picture of Robert E.
Lee at the age of 38 with his son.
Lee is displaying a Mason sign called the Hidden Hand.
Compare that picture with these pictures.
All display the same Masonic gesture.
That the Jesuits had infiltrated Freemasonry in the late 1700s and had
taken control of the leadership of this secret society was unknown to Freemasons
serving in both the Northern and Southern armies.
Essentially all Freemasons were serving the Jesuits and the Pope.
Besides Lee's inactions and blunders on the battlefield as well as those of other
Confederate generals, a case can be made that the South's greatest general,
Stonewall Jackson, was murdered during the four-day Battle of Chancellorsville,
Lee being an accomplice.
Jackson brings forth his plan to Lee how to flank Hooker's army and then we can
attack him from the rear.
And Lee says, well, go ahead.
Instead of saying, praise God, yes, if we can defeat Hooker, we can then
march across the Potomac to Washington.
Because that's all it would have taken.
We were this close to keeping our liberty.
But, because Lee is in cahoots with Hooker, and there are Jesuits who are
observers on the battlefield, as there were at Gettysburg, an arrangement is made
between Lee and A.P.
Hill, because A.P.
Hill hated Jackson's guts.
Jackson had A.P.
Hill arrested.
This is General A.P.
Hill.
General Jackson had General A.P.
Hill arrested for insubordination.
And Hill hated him for it.
And so this was Hill's chance to get back.
So Hill happens to have a subordinate general underneath him, who then will be
used to fire upon Jackson.
So Jackson, as he arranges his soldiers, as they flanked Hooker, and he tells them,
whatever you do, do not stop.
You march right through the federal camp.
Well, what happens is, A.P.
Hill's general stops the whole movement.
So everything is almost thrown in disarray, and finally this guy is
convinced, let's just keep going on.
So by this time, they are losing valuable time.
Still, it was a rout, but it wasn't a defeat like it could have been.
And Jackson realizes that something is very wrong.
He is now betrayed by A.P.
Hill, and he is betrayed by this other subordinate.
So in the evening, Jackson is reconnoitering, trying to see what should
be done, and he is fired upon by his own troops.
And I show in my book that it was a conspiracy, because some of the people
there, Jackson didn't know who they were.
They were Confederate officers, and Jackson had never seen them before.
So, Jackson is wounded, but it's not mortal.
He is bleeding, and he is bleeding severely, but what happens is that Major
McGuire, the doctor, is called to his assistance.
Well, the doctor then takes him off the way from the battlefield and amputates the
arm, and his left arm.
And Jackson is beginning to recover, but Lee orders him to be taken away from
the battlefield by this doctor.
And Jackson said, our men need our doctor.
Why deprive our hurting, dying men of this valuable doctor?
I'm getting better.
But oh no, Lee gives the order to go to Guinea Station, take Jackson with you.
And so Jackson is being taken there, and he's beginning to recover,
and he's talking to the doctor.
When can I get back?
And so on.
Well, the doctor gets him to Guinea Station, and takes Jackson, takes him away
from the main house, and takes him out to this little shack, where only the doctor
and he are allowed to be.
And it's there that this dirty Freemason, Hunter McGuire, poisons Jackson,
I believe, on about a Wednesday, or Thursday.
And then Jackson's wife is able to come, and she sees him, but Jackson's not well.
His arm is, it's the famous picture of him, where he's had his arm amputated,
but you really don't see it, the sleeve is still there.
But he's been poisoned for the first time.
And then Friday or Saturday, he's given the final poisoning, and he can't survive.
And so the doctor poisons him, and his wife is pleading, his wife Julie
is pleading for him, the doctor isn't there anymore, you can do for him.
And so he dies, and with the death of Jackson, the poisoning of Jackson,
then this very same wicked Hunter McGuire, poisons Jackson's right hand man,
who's also a preacher, Sandy Pendleton, Colonel Pendleton.
He poisoned him too.
So the Jesuits are busy using this doctor to get rid of the true Southern
Confederate leadership, Lee being a party to all of this.
Like many others, Stonewall Jackson was getting in the way of Jesuit plans and had
to be eliminated.
At this point, we should take note of a man by the name of James Clark.
Clark graduated from West Point in 1829.
After graduation, Clark was assigned to Louisiana.
After a year of service, James Clark resigned his commission and converted to
Catholicism.
In 1844, Clark would become the first West Point graduate to join the Jesuits.
Clark went on to teach mathematics and science at Georgetown University,
and he became the president of Holy Cross.
It was said that Clark took a lively interest in the doings of his former
classmates.
And just who were his former classmates?
None other than Robert E.
Lee and Joseph E.
Johnston.
One can also include Jefferson Davis in this list, since Davis graduated a year
ahead of Clark.
It can only be guessed as to what communications these former West Point
graduates had with each other.
But that a Jesuit was in communication with Lee, Johnston, and Davis during the
period of the war between the states is surprising and somewhat shocking.
And what is even more shocking were the activities of Confederate President
Jefferson Davis in 1863.
Protestant Jefferson Davis began corresponding with the Roman Catholic
Pope.
Pope Pius IX, who was completely in the hands of the Jesuit order at this time,
because he was not in their hands when he first became Pope.
He writes a letter to Jefferson Davis acknowledging him as the President of the
United States.
After the Battle of Gettysburg, there was a lot of correspondence that
took place between the Davis government and the Vatican.
The Davis government appealing to the Pope for official help and recognition,
which Pope Pius IX eventually did give him.
Davis was no stranger to Roman Catholicism.
He had entered the Dominican-operated College of St. Thomas Aquinas near
Springfield, Kentucky for two years.
He was the only Protestant student at the school.
Interestingly enough, the young Davis sought to become a Catholic but was
encouraged to remain Protestant.
One must ask why would the Roman Catholic Church turn down a convert?
Did the Roman Church have plans for Davis that would be better served with him
remaining a Protestant?
After the war, Davis was sent a portrait of the Pope.
Such a gift, said a great niece, was never before conferred on any but
crowned heads.
General Lee also had his own picture of Pope Pius IX, noting that the Pope was the
only sovereign in Europe who recognized our poor Confederacy.
Such was the attitude of these leaders of the Confederacy.
Men who were easily fooled or who were willingly playing along with the Jesuits'
plan.
It was these men who led the Protestants of the South into a war that they had no
intention of winning.
Shades of Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf Wars come to mind.
It should be remembered that for all of its posturing and open statements of
support for the South, the Papacy was really not on the South's side at all.
The open but false policy of Rome was that the Pope was on the side of the South.
And Chinoquy falls for this little delusion in his book, unfortunately.
The secret but true policy of Rome was that Rome was completely on the side of
the radical Red Republicans in the North.
Stevens, Sumner, Bingham, the list goes on and on.
So, because of this, the Jesuits made a show that they were behind the South to
create more animosity on the part of the Northern Protestants against the
Southerners of the South.
Because the Pope is against us by siding with the South.
When in fact, he wanted the utter annihilation of the Southern Protestants.
Now let us turn our attention to the Union Army.
What was true with the Southern generals, Lincoln, to his dismay, discovered was
also true with his Northern generals.
They had allegiances to others besides the Union and Lincoln.
General George McClellan failed to employ his vastly superior forces to defeat
Confederate General Lee on numerous occasions, the most famous of which was at
the Battle of Antietam.
Historian James M.
McPherson has pointed out that the two corps of troops McClellan kept in reserve
were in fact larger than Lee's entire force.
The reason for McClellan's reluctance to put his reserve into the fight was that,
as in previous battles, he was convinced he was outnumbered.
It should also be pointed out that McClellan was a Freemason.
The question has to be asked, who was McClellan really listening to?
Lincoln or the Jesuit Superior General?
Earlier we noted General Lee's disastrous orders to General Pickett at the Battle of
Gettysburg.
At the same battle, Union General George Meade allowed General Lee to escape.
Meade was a Roman Catholic.
And after Gettysburg, Lee is allowed to escape because a Jesuit then rides into
the camp of Roman Catholic General Meade.
And Roman Catholic Meade refuses to pursue Lee's army and captures only one gun.
When the South could have been defeated right then and there, and there would not
have been the rape, pillage, and plunder from 1863 to 1865.
There would not have been the destruction of General Sherman from Atlantis to
Savannah.
There wouldn't have been the burning down of Protestant Columbia.
The four Protestant states of the South that were to be destroyed and plundered
were Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Virginia.
Those are the states that were plundered.
New Orleans was under Butler the Beast, but Roman Catholic Louisiana was not
persecuted.
But it was those four key Protestant southern states that were made war upon.
That would not have happened had Lee not been allowed to escape.
And Chinoquy writes of this in his book when the Jesuit rode into the camp and
spoke to Meade.
So it was a war against the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant Baptist people of
the South, perpetrated by not only the generals of the North, Grant and Sheridan
and Sherman and all those despicable criminals with their federal banditi and
their Roman Catholic Irishmen that they brought over here to steal everything they
could steal off the southern plantations and to rape the black southern women that
were slaves.
It was a general raping so bad that many of the black men took their women into the
swamps and to deliver them from this Yankee pillage.
It was a complete and total grand theft and larceny of the southern people.
In spite of the treacherous behavior on both sides, on April 9th, 1865,
General Robert E.
Lee surrendered his Confederate Army to General Ulysses S.
Grant at the village of Appomattox Courthouse in Virginia.
Two days later, on April 11th, Lincoln made a speech discussing post-war
America.
In the speech, Lincoln spoke in a conciliatory manner toward the southern
states.
Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper
practical relations between these states and the Union, they never having been out
of it.
These words, taken with the amnesty for all southerners that Lincoln had
proclaimed in November of 1863, show us that the President was not looking
for further reprisals or punishments against the South.
However, Rome and the Holy Alliance wanted no amnesty for the South.
And going back to the hated Constitution, with states' rights and freedoms derived
from the Bible, Lincoln had served his purpose.
It was time for his removal.
Lincoln was a useful tool, thinking he was actually saving the Union, because he
wanted to restore the southern states on the same footing they had left the Union,
which would have frustrated the purposes of the Jesuit order by making a
consolidated empire out of all the states.
To ensure total chaos, the Jesuits decided Lincoln would not be the only target.
So they came up with this plan to assassinate not just Abraham Lincoln,
but the entire government.
The South had lost the Civil War, so they were going to take out Abraham
Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, the head of the Northern Army,
Ulysses S.
Grant, and the Secretary of the State, William Seward, all in one night.
On April 14th, 1865, only five days after Lee's surrender, the conspirators struck.
Abraham Lincoln was shot while watching a play at Ford's Theater.
He died the next morning, April 15th, at 7.22 a.m.
Secretary of State Seward was attacked at his home.
The assassin, Louis Payne, repeatedly stabbed Seward and escaped.
Miraculously, Seward recovered from his wounds.
Vice President Johnson's assassin, George Atselrod, lost his nerve at the
last minute and fled the scene.
And General Grant avoided his assassin by leaving town earlier in the day to check
on a sick friend.
But who were these assassins?
Most people know about John Wilkes Booth, the man who pulled the trigger and killed
Lincoln.
But few realize that most of the conspirators were Roman Catholic.
Even Booth had converted to Catholicism.
It's clear that John Wilkes Booth, while he was a member of the Knights of
the Golden Circle, at the time he was plotting Lincoln's assassination,
he was also meeting in the home of a very devout Roman Catholic woman by the name of
Mary Surratt, right in Washington, D.C.
And it was in her home that the plot to kill Lincoln was hatched.
The Jesuits of Washington, D.C., put together the plot for the
assassination.
The Jesuit of power behind that plot was Bernadine F.
Wiggett.
Jesuits under the stream of an induction, they were not directly to be involved.
They only were the elements, the intellectual element that will prepare
this.
The case of Abraham Lincoln.
Abraham Lincoln, the president, was killed by the Jesuits of Rome.
But there was no Jesuit there involved directly.
Nevertheless, it was the Jesuits who prepared the plot against his life,
and prepared and trained those who were to kill him.
They arranged it.
Yes.
To be sure, the assassins were also Southerners, but they were first and
foremost Jesuit assassins, and agents of the foreign dictator called the Pope.
Among the conspirators was Mary Surratt's son, John Surratt.
His tale leads to the very doors of the Papal Palace in Rome.
Four of them were eventually hung, and the rest were sent to prison for
various lengths of time.
Booth was killed in a barn.
But the story around Surratt is absolutely amazing.
Surratt, after the assassination, John Surratt escaped to Canada.
Now the Southern government had a kitchen cabinet based in Montreal.
So that's the first place he went, was to Montreal.
And who's in Montreal to meet this Surratt was two priests.
And they squirreled him away for about six months.
At the same time, the government is looking all over for this guy.
It's like the biggest manhunt in U.S.
history, and they can't find him.
And here he is, sitting in a little town outside of Montreal, being protected by
priests.
The Jesuits were behind this assassination.
They controlled Surratt.
Surratt called time outside of Ford's Theatre.
John Wilkes Booth does the shooting.
The guard, the Secret Service guard, who's supposedly supposed to be guarding
the entranceway to the Booth of Lincoln, he just happens to leave his post.
And he's never punished for it.
So the assassination takes place.
Surratt escapes to Canada.
He's taken to Liverpool.
He's taken from there to Rome.
He enlists in the Pope's wild army.
And in 1867, he's discovered through another Roman Catholic who reveals the
truth about it.
And he is then brought back to the United States and put on trial.
He has two trials.
And because Roman Catholics have more allegiance to their priests and the canon
law than they do our country, when a Roman Catholic's on a jury, they can hang a jury
and let the murderer go free.
And that's exactly what happened to John Surratt.
As a result of the Surratt affair and the papal policy of not allowing Protestant
churches within the city of Rome, the United States of America ended
diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 1867.
But even with the end of diplomatic relations with the U.S., the Jesuits had
achieved a great victory.
First, hundreds of thousands of Protestants were dead.
Second, much of the Protestant South lay in ruins.
And third, forcing the South at gunpoint to stay in the Union had dealt a severe
blow to the Constitution and the concept of freedom.
And lastly, Lincoln was dead and the Jesuits were avenged for his interference
in the Chinoquy trial and his attempt to restore the Republic to its pre-war state.
Adding insult to this situation, the Jesuit-controlled, radical Republicans
in Congress, men like Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens, were able to pass the
14th Amendment in 1868.
The 14th Amendment created a new type of citizen, a citizen of the United States.
Whereas before a man was a citizen of the state in which he was born, citizenship
was now at the national level.
Ostensibly, this new citizenship was created to help the freed slaves.
But in reality, it was a measure that would allow the federal government to
strip away constitutional rights from the people and replace those rights with
privileges granted by the government.
In Maxwell v.
Dow of 1899, the Supreme Court said that none of the Bill of Rights are privileges
and immunities of 14th Amendment U.S.
citizenship.
And the great dissent by John Marshall Harlan, the first Harlan, must be read by
every viewer as he goes out of his chair to say that we don't enjoy real liberty.
That our rights of American freemen have been overthrown.
That our Anglo-Saxon liberties are gone.
And then he reiterates in 1908 in Twining v.
New Jersey, when Twining v.
New Jersey comes out and says, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment,
the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment,
the Seventh Amendment, the Eighth Amendment, none of those amendments are
privileges and immunities of United States citizenship under the Fourteenth
Amendment.
That's why in court you take your Fifth Amendment privilege.
That's why you own a gun with a privilege.
That's why you worship God now by a privilege granted from Washington.
This ought to make us irate.
All we have is Soviet citizenship.
But all of us are, whites and blacks, we're all slaves of the Jesuits of
Washington, D.C.
And when none of us have any absolute rights to limit the powers of Washington,
the only thing that limits Washington's powers is the decisions of the Supreme
Court.
The Supreme Court is controlled by the Jesuits of Georgetown.
You've got five Roman Catholics sitting on it now.
But why was it so important to the Jesuits to create a nation?
In his book, A Constitutional View of the Law of the Late War Between the States,
Alexander Stevens tells us why.
In Volume 2, Alexander Stevens tells us on page 650 the real reason of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
Quote, consolidation and empire.
That's the purpose of the amendment.
Consolidation of the states and empire.
That's why I call it the Pope's Holy Roman Fourteenth Amendment.
Corporate, fascist, socialist, communist empire created by this
Fourteenth Amendment.
He goes on and says, They have not as yet openly denied the federative character of
the government.
However, in direct war upon its principles, their acts have been covertly
aimed.
This is an exceedingly important fact to be specifically noted and kept in mind.
These monstrous reconstruction measures, with all their enormities and fatal
tendencies, towards ultimate, complete centralism and empire, are still based
upon the assumption that the states, as separate, integral parts, constitute
members of what is still, in words at least, acknowledged to be a federal union.
All these bold usurpations of power are, upon their face, nothing but resorts to
induce or to compel, under duress, the peoples of the several southern states
to go through the forms of adopting the Fourteenth Amendment as an additional
article to the Constitution.
So, he then concludes, No system of representative government can be long
maintained by any people who have not the intelligence to understand it,
the patriotism to approve it, and the virtue to maintain, in violet,
both its form and principles as established.
So, this is the reason for the Fourteenth Amendment.
Consolidation and empire.
And this is what Andrew Johnson understood was the purpose, and so he campaigned
against it.
And he called Lee a hero if that was the real reason for this war, to keep this
consolidation and empire from being formed.
The Fourteenth Amendment was proclaimed ratified on July 28, 1868.
That was the end of the Washington's Republic, as established in 1787.
So, our white Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, and Baptist-Calvinist Federal Republic of
these United States lasted from 1787 to 1868.
And a new nation was established in 1868, and that is called the American Empire in
my book, and it has existed from 1868 to the present.
And it is squarely in the hands of the papacy for two reasons.
For destroying heretics, liberals, perfidious Jews, and infidel Muslims and
Buddhists, over the last hundred years since the Spanish-American, or since
really the Indian War of the Great Plains.
The War of the Great Plains from 1860 to 1890 was the annihilation of the Native
American Indians so that they could build an empire from sea to shining sea.
A terrible crime.
And it was all led by a Roman Catholic Army General named Philip Sheridan,
who was advised by America's most powerful Western Jesuit at the time, Pierre de
Schmitt.
And it was as Philip Sheridan who said, the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
With the 14th Amendment, the Constitution of the Founding Fathers was tossed into
the dustbin of history, and centralization of power in Washington, D.C.
was well underway.
Now the American Empire could begin in earnest.
The American states, both in the North and South, would be subservient to the federal
government and would be, essentially, slaves to this new master.
In rapid secession, the United States found itself in one war after another.
The Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam
War, the Cold War, Gulf War I, Gulf War II, and a host of smaller police
actions, such as in Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Libya.
Looking over the last 150 years, one can discern the influence of the
Jesuits in the initiation of these wars and conflicts for the purpose of building
a world empire under their control.
Early in the 20th century, the Jesuits were determined to start a new European
war.
Germany expelled the Jesuits in 1872.
Russia had expelled the Jesuits in 1820.
France had expelled the Jesuits in 1880.
Britain had formally, although not in actuality, had formally expelled the
Jesuits in 1829.
Every country in Europe, Switzerland, 1848, every country in Europe had expelled
the Jesuits except Belgium.
And so the Jesuits said, well now, we're going to have to punish these people
because they obviously didn't learn the lesson of Napoleon Bonaparte.
So what we're going to do is we're going to use Britain and we're going to use
America.
And we're going to have a second 30 years war.
The first one was from 1618 to 1648.
The second one is going to be from 1914 to 1945.
We're going to have World War I.
We're going to have the Bolshevik Revolution.
We're going to have the Spanish Civil War.
We're going to have World War II.
We're going to just have continual war for 30 years.
And we're going to control all the factions.
We're going to control the Allies.
We're going to control the Axis.
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the spark that ignited the
First World War.
Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir apparent to the Austro-Hungarian throne.
His inclusive policy towards the Slavic peoples and lenient treatment of Orthodox
Christian Serbia made him unacceptable to Rome.
He therefore could not be allowed to rule.
The assassination was set for July 26, 1914.
Since the year 1054, the Catholic Church has been waging war against Orthodox
Christians.
The Orthodox Christians did not accept the supremacy of the Pope.
A war involving the major powers of Europe would be a perfect opportunity to have
hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Orthodox Serbs and Russians killed.
Afterwards, Rome would be in a better position to dominate these countries.
Who shot the Archduke?
Gavrilo Princip, a member of the secret society called the Black Hand.
The Black Hand was founded by Freemasons.
During the trial, Princip testified that his colleague, Saganovich, told me he was
a Freemason.
And on another occasion, told me that the heir apparent, Franz Ferdinand,
had been condemned to death by a Freemason's lodge.
Even though a Masonic group carried out the murder, all of Serbia was blamed.
It was never pointed out at that time that the assassins were linked to Freemasonry,
and that its upper levels had been under the control of the Jesuits for nearly a
century.
After World War I, a movement was put in motion to have a world government that
would help the nations of the world live in peace.
A peace controlled by the Jesuits.
When this world government, or League of Nations, failed to materialize,
the Jesuits pushed forward plans to create a second world war.
Even before the end of World War I, the Jesuits had set in motion a plan to
bring the Russian Orthodox Christians back into the fold of the Pope's control.
Under the direction of their superior general, Vladimir Ladovchosky,
the Jesuits instigated the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.
This revolution brought Communism to Russia.
The Jesuits had been thrown out of Russia over a hundred years earlier, but now the
leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin, admitted the Jesuits back into Russia in
1922.
Lenin proved fickle and showed signs of disloyalty to the Jesuits.
For this, he was poisoned, and his replacement, Joseph Stalin, was ready to
carry on with the Vatican's bidding.
As a boy, Stalin had obtained a scholarship to attend Tiflis Theological
Seminary.
Openly, the school was Orthodox Christianity, but behind the scene,
it was run by the Jesuits.
In 1931, Stalin was interviewed by Emil Ludwig.
Ludwig, do you not admit that the Jesuits have good points?
Stalin, yes, they are systematic and persevering in working to achieve sordid
ends, but their principal method is spying, prying, worming their way into
people's souls, and outraging their feelings.
Once in power, Stalin killed millions of people, both Jews and Orthodox Christians.
He killed anyone who would resist the new Soviet state he created based on Marxism.
What many failed to understand was that Marxism was based on the Jesuit slave
plantations, or reducciones, in South America, and Sir Thomas More's book,
Utopia.
What the Jesuits did was, is they were the masters of Communism.
There was a Catholic traitor whose name was Sir Thomas More.
Sir Thomas More betrayed King Henry VIII, gave his full allegiance to the Pope,
and for which reason Thomas More was executed as a traitor, holding for the
Pope's temporal power over his allegiance to his king.
Sir Thomas More is the author of Utopia.
Utopia is the foundation for Communism.
So, Communism is Romanism.
In fact, the orders, the many communities of the Roman Catholic institution,
the Jesuit order, the Redemptorist, that goes on and on, they run on Communist
principles of universal equality.
Communist is a Latin term.
So, therefore, Communism is a brainchild of the Jesuits, but it has been made to
look Jewish through implementing it through Marx and his Communist Manifesto,
through the British Freemason, Engels.
Besides establishing Communism in Russia after World War I, the Jesuits sought to
reestablish the Pope's physical kingdom that had been taken from him in 1871.
On June 7, 1929, the Lateran Treaty was ratified, which reestablished the Pope's
domain called Vatican City.
The new Prime Minister of Italy, Benito Mussolini, was instrumental in
bringing the Pope to power, but only a few months before the economic crash that
started in America and quickly spread around the world called the Great
Depression.
Approximately $90 million worth of gold in lira, I think it was about a billion worth
of lira, something like that, was given to the papacy by the Italian government for
reparations, for lack of a better word, for the crash from 1870 to 1929,
and you owe us all this money.
So, Benito Mussolini enslaves the Italian Catholic people, makes them pay this huge
sum, which they didn't want to pay, and what does the papacy do with this
money?
Well, this treaty is in about February or March.
In October, the Jesuits crashed the American stock market, and they used their
number one candidate, Joseph P. Kennedy, to do it.
So, they sell short, the margin calls can't be met, the stock market crashes,
and what happens?
The Vatican takes their millions of dollars that they got from Mussolini,
and they invest it in all the corporations and businesses that are busted on Wall
Street, and they buy it all for pennies.
So, by the time Wall Street comes back into power,
they are the biggest corporations in this country.
As banks began to fail, the Federal Reserve did not act to pump money into the
system, which it should have done, had those in control of it wanted to keep
the banks afloat.
As the chaos lingered, and many lost their jobs, and were driven into poverty,
the Jesuits created a dictatorship out of the office of the President of the United
States.
In March 1933,
a state of national emergency.
Under such a state of emergency, the Constitution was set aside,
ostensibly for the public good, until the emergency was cancelled by the
President.
Roosevelt never cancelled the emergency.
This was verified in 1973 by the Church Matthias Committee, and published in
Senate Report 93-549.
No American President since then has cancelled the emergency, and even though
Congress passed the National Emergency Termination Act in 1974, this termination
was in name only.
The reality was that the emergency powers taken were never returned.
They continued in the U.S.
Code as permanent powers.
Thus, we are currently in a state of emergency, or dictatorship.
It should also be noted that Roosevelt was a 32nd degree Freemason.
FDR was obliged to follow the orders of the head His oath to Freemasonry
superseded his oath to the U.S.
Constitution.
And as we have seen, the man in control of Freemasonry was the Jesuit Superior
General.
In Germany, the Vatican had in place Adolf Hitler.
It is usually not emphasized, but Hitler was a Roman Catholic.
Hitler praised the Roman Catholic Church, saying that, until now, there has never
been anything more grandiose on the earth than the hierarchical organization of the
Catholic Church.
Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's head of the SS, was also a Roman Catholic.
Friedrich Hoffet wrote, Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, and most members of the
party's old guard were Catholics.
After the war, Walter Schellenberg, former head of German counter-espionage,
criticized Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit order.
Himmler's title as Supreme Commander of the SS was to be the equivalent of the
Jesuit's general.
Incredibly, although he killed and tortured millions, the Vatican never
excommunicated Hitler.
In fact, not one of the mass murderers of the Third Reich was ever excommunicated by
the Vatican.
The day Hitler died, the Spanish dictator Franco, also a Roman Catholic,
ran in the publication Reforma.
Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic Church, died while defending Christianity.
As a loyal son, Hitler killed heretics, including Protestants, Jews, Orthodox
Christians, and even liberal Catholics.
All told, the war dead numbered between 62 to 78 million people.
11 million of the total dead from World War II ended up being Jews.
The Jewish Holocaust was never condemned by Pope Pius XII, or for that matter,
by any other pope.
Why this silence?
The Jews, like all heretics, resisted conversion to Roman Catholicism and
obedience to the pope.
Who financed Hitler?
The answer is clear and easily verified.
The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the West gave Hitler the money he
needed to build the Third Reich.
As early as 1919, Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli met a young Adolf Hitler in
Munich.
The meeting occurred at night while all the household was asleep except for the
nun who attended Archbishop Pacelli.
Her name was Pascalina.
According to Pascalina, Hitler told Pacelli that he was out to check in Munich
and elsewhere.
It did not come as a surprise to her, therefore, in light of Pacelli's hatred of
the Reds, to see the prelate present Hitler with a large cash of church money
to aid the rising revolutionary and his small, struggling band of anti-communists.
Go, quell the devil's work.
Help spread the love of Almighty God, Pacelli told Hitler.
For the love of Almighty God, she heard the young man Adolf Hitler reply.
Money for this young revolutionary also came from industrialists in the West.
Hitler's rise to power was financed by London and New York and Berlin.
They were the Knights of Malta running the banking institutions of the world.
In the discipline of historical research, one of the greatest taboo subjects is to
look into who financed Hitler.
The answer is clear and easily verified.
The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the West gave Hitler the money he
needed to build the Third Reich.
Many do not realize that Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W.
Bush and George Herbert Walker, the maternal great-grandfather of
President George W.
Bush, were Nazi collaborators.
Along with Averill Harriman, they set up Union Banking Corporation as a complex
money laundering operation for a number of Nazi front businesses.
Documents at the National Archives and the Library of Congress show conclusively that
Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker should have been tried for treason because
their Nazi dealings continued after the U .S.
entered World War II.
They had continued to do business with their primary Nazi patron who was Fritz
Thyssen who backed Hitler beginning in 1921 and who was the wealthiest man in
Germany and a steel and coal baron who with his partner Friedrich Flick
essentially built the Nazi war machine along with I.G.
Farben.
In 1951, when Fritz Thyssen died in Argentina, Union Banking Corporation was
liquidated by the U.S.
government and Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his holdings in his Nazi
business and that was the beginning of the Bush family fortune for all intents and
purposes.
George Bush doesn't take his philosophical foundation from the Bible or the teachings
of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount.
George Bush takes his inspiration from what he learned in Skull and Bones and
from the fool society that Hitler and Goebbels and Goering cut their teeth in,
Bohemian Grove, these evil organizations that perpetrate the ugly things that these
criminals are doing to this country for which the Jesuits created the Illuminati
in 1776.
The American branch of the Illuminati was called Skull and Bones and has its
headquarters at CIA recruiting ground, Yale University.
Prescott Bush was a member, as was his son and grandson, President George W.
Bush.
It is interesting that in the 2004 presidential election, two Skull and Bones
members ran against each other.
You were both in Skull and Bones,
what does that tell us?
The conspiracy theorists are going to go wild.
I'm sure they are, I don't know.
Number 322?
First of all, he's not the nominee.
And, uh, but, uh...
Are you prepared to lose?
No, I'm not going to lose.
You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society in Yale.
What does that tell us?
Not much, because it's a secret.
Is there a secret handshake?
Is there a secret code?
I wish there were something secret I could manifest.
322, secret number?
There are all kinds of secrets, Tim, but one thing is not a secret.
I disagree with this president's direction.
It is evident that the Bush family and others are under, and have been under,
the control of the Jesuits for decades.
Most people are familiar with Hitler's book, Mein Kampf.
However, it may surprise many that Hitler did not write the book.
Adolf Hitler was not a writer.
Adolf Hitler was a newspaper reader.
According to Kurt Kruger's great book, I Was Hitler's Doctor, it was published in
1934, he said that Hitler's lair was just filled with old newspapers, that that's
all he ever did was read.
Old newspapers.
He was not a writer.
He was not a journalist.
He was not a student of history.
He was not a student of culture.
If you read Mein Kampf, whoever wrote it knew the cultures of many different
countries over many different centuries.
They knew all about political practices.
The writers of Mein Kampf were brilliant.
And Mein Kampf, according to Leo Lehmann, who was an Irish Roman Catholic priest,
who wrote Behind the Dictators in 1942, said that Father Bernard Stampfel was the
real author of Mein Kampf.
Adolf Hitler was created to be an instrument of the Jesuits, and like
Napoleon, Hitler served his creator well.
Millions of the Vatican's enemies were dead, and America forgot George
Washington's warnings and abandoned its policy of isolationism.
During World War II, the Vatican targeted the Orthodox Christians in Croatia for
destruction.
As in World War I, the Orthodox Serbians of Croatia suffered again in World War II.
A campaign of terror and murder was inflicted on the Serbs by the Croatian
Ustase regime.
The leader of the Ustase was Ante Pavelic, a Roman Catholic.
Pavelic and the Ustase murdered around 500,000 people, while 250,000 were
expelled, and another 200,000 were forced to convert to Catholicism.
Like the Jewish Holocaust, Pope Pius XII never condemned these atrocities,
nor has any pope since then condemned them.
Once the war had concluded, the Vatican helped former Nazis escape Germany to save
havens in South America.
They even helped Ustase leader Pavelic escape to Argentina.
Pope Pius XII was the pope who saved hundreds of thousands of Europe's Nazis
who passed through Vatican monasteries Dominican, Benedictine, and Jesuit where
they were given shelter, new identities, new passports, sent largely to South
America, but there were plenty sent elsewhere, including to the United States
where there was even a program to get the good ones out, Operation Paperclip,
which is well known, but Canada let in.
And I know this.
Mackenzie King let in the Nazis who passed through the Vatican monasteries and this
Pope Pius XII could...
It's impossible he didn't know about that.
After World War II, a conflict began between the Western powers, mainly the U
.S.
and Britain, and those of the East, the Soviets and the Chinese.
It came to be called the Cold War.
From its beginning, the Cold War was a way of keeping the world in chaos and fear,
and it was also a way of fighting against the communist nations, and most
importantly, a way to keep the spotlight off the Vatican.
Many people knew of Rome's backing of the Catholic dictators of Europe.
They also knew of Rome's aid in helping many of them to escape.
The Vatican had not been punished for these crimes.
In fact, Pope Pius XII should have stood before the judges at Nuremberg.
The Jesuits used the Cold War It worked like a charm.
To get it started, a rock in the road had to be removed.
That rock was General George S.
Patton.
At the end of World War II, General George Patton wanted to attack the Soviet Union.
Patton saw the menace to the free world communism was, and wanted to go ahead and
end it.
Patton's conversation to General McNarney in 1945 was revealing.
Why not do it now, while our army is intact and the damn Russians can have
their hind end kicked back into Russia in three months?
The Jesuits could not allow the Soviet Union to be destroyed.
As Robert Wilcox lays out in his book, Target Patton, Roman Catholic William
Donovan, head of the OSS, arranged for the assassination of Patton.
Patton had survived
while in the hospital.
A refined form of cyanide was given to him that can cause or appear to cause
embolisms and heart failure.
After making preparations to leave the hospital, Patton's health took a sudden
turn for the worse, and he died.
The result was that the Jesuits got their Cold War.
During the Cold War,
Patton turned against the Vatican and the Jesuits.
Kennedy decided to be his own man, take his own counsel, and not take orders
from Rome.
He turned out to be a liberal Catholic, which is just as obnoxious to the Vatican
as a Protestant or any heretic.
Kennedy began to pull out of Vietnam.
He ordered the Treasury Department to print money and not go through the
privately held Federal Reserve.
And he had plans
that Kennedy wanted Cuba back from Castro.
The big lie is that Kennedy, he canceled the orders.
He didn't cancel the orders.
McGeorge Bundy canceled the order for the air cover in the Bay of Pigs.
That's according to Fletcher Prouty in his book JFK.
And on the USS Essex, which was an aircraft carrier there, the captain was
told not to give any air cover to the invading patriots there in Cuba.
But that cover was canceled, not by JFK, because the night before he said he gave a
go-ahead.
And to prove this point, there's a book that's been released about a year ago
called Ultimate Sacrifice, written by Waldron.
And in that book, it shows that JFK had planned to invade Cuba on December 1,
1963
and he was killed three or nine days before the invasion was to take place.
Like the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, John F.
Kennedy's assassination was meticulously planned and executed with Lee Harvey
Oswald as the Patsy.
You see, Gene Hill and Mary Moorman were right there at the limousine.
And Gene Hill and Mary Moorman said that the driver turned around and shot.
They didn't know the driver was shooting JFK in the head along with the storm drain
shooter at a simultaneous headshot.
That shot from the Grassy Knoll was a distraction.
They had a smoke.
I mean, we've had smokeless gunpowder since the turn of the century.
I mean, why would they use a rifle and have smoke?
It was a distraction for the crowd to run up to the Grassy Knoll because the real
shooters was the storm drain shooter
who was shot five times.
The assassination was done in a very public way to show other would-be
presidents what would happen if orders were not followed.
The assassination of John F.
Kennedy was done in broad daylight as a warning to all the other leaders of the
world.
But it was also done with this viciousness because you see, JFK was a Catholic.
And they wanted to kill their Catholic boy who refused to uphold the temple power of
the Pope.
So they killed him viciously and cruelly as a warning to any other Catholic who
would dare tremble the temple power of the Pope.
In contrast to Kennedy, Ronald Reagan did everything he could to court Vatican
approval after an assassination attempt on his life in 1981.
Ronald Reagan was advocating some things that would have built a middle class and
were generally pretty good.
He was talking like a conservative.
Evidently he thought for a few minutes he was the president because he'd been told
to choose George Bush as the vice presidential candidate.
And all the conservatives said how could you do this to us?
And yet he's still quote-unquote elected.
So Reagan starts to advocate some pretty good things and so we're going to punish
you, Ronnie.
And so they carried out the attempted assassination.
If he survives, he'll do what he's told.
If he doesn't survive, well then George Bush will openly take his place and be the
president.
Either way we win.
So Jerry Parr, the secret service agent, shoots Reagan inside the vehicle and makes
it look like Hinkley is the one who shot him.
Hinkley did not shoot Reagan.
Reagan was untouched inside the limousine.
He was shot inside the limousine by a secret service agent and then phenomenally
enough, a Jewish doctor saved his life.
So Bush was a part of this of course.
He was not openly made the president but he was secretly the president during the
entire two terms of Ronald Reagan.
President Reagan has come to fulfill the greatest moment in the history of this
conspiracy because no other president has come as close as President Reagan with the
Vatican and not even John F.
Kennedy.
What that means is they have done to President Reagan what they were not able
to do even through a Roman Catholic president.
In 1984, Reagan established diplomatic relations with the Vatican.
Not since 1867 have there been any official contact between the two
countries.
That relationship was formally restored by the worst president America has ever been
disgraced with, our greatest traitor, Ronald Reagan.
When he restored diplomatic relationships with the Vatican, formally recognized the
sovereign state of Vatican City as a nation and now America can enter into a
concordat with the Pope as warned by ex-Jesuit leaders.
Ex-Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera also revealed a secret concerning the
inauguration of Ronald Reagan that some noted at the time but few fully
understood.
Alberto Rivera made a startling statement in which he said there would be a sign
given to Jesuits throughout the world when all churches would be taken over by the
Jesuit order.
It would be when a president of the United States took his oath of office facing an
obelisk.
For the first time in U.S.
history, the swearing-in ceremonies were moved to the west front of the Capitol and
President Reagan faced the Washington Monument.
After Reagan's presidential reign, the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 and the
Cold War ended.
Instead of greater freedom, nations around the world found their governments becoming
more repressive.
Terrorism became the new foe and the United States and other western
governments pledged to fight this new enemy at all costs.
That included taking away all God-given rights from the people in order to bring
about supposed peace and safety.
In America and elsewhere,
the U.S.
government but failed to stop them.
In fact, it is now painfully obvious that the government allowed these attacks to
occur.
Unfortunately, the American people find themselves in the same situation and
making the same mistake that the southern people made before the war between the
states.
In the 1800s, the South, like the North, had Jesuit-controlled Freemasons
and many newspapers were also under Rome's control.
These men and media outlets created the agitation towards war.
As the slave issue escalated, pushing the South towards secession, the southern
people fully expected God to be on their side.
However, like America today, the people of the South failed to understand they were
not on God's side.
The South did not practice biblically sanctioned slavery.
The South practiced two types of slavery.
A voluntary servitude to pay off debt and slavery as a result of war.
The South did not practice these types of slavery.
The South practiced man-stealing or kidnapping for profit.
Exodus 21-16 clearly states, And he that stealeth a man and selleth him,
or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
The South refused to repent of man-stealing.
The South reaped a harvest of death and destruction.
Likewise, America today is finding itself in the same situation.
Instead of asking God why he did not protect them from the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001, Americans were easily manipulated with pride and cried out for
vengeance against a foreign enemy.
turn their enemies by promoting endless war.
Instead of asking God what they had done to offend him and lose their blessed
state, the American people are seeking answers and solutions from politicians,
false prophets, and economic wizards.
For the most part, the American people do not see a correlation between turning
their backs
on the American people In the beginning of the 20th century, the Jesuits decided to
implement their plans to create a central bank in the United States.
Their plan would enable them to pay for the wars that were coming as the American
empire expanded.
Once this was accomplished, the common man
the Protestant Reformation which had a middle class and private rights and
private wealth and private land ownership and in their attempt to bring the world
back to the dark ages, the 13th century when Pope Innocent III was the demon pope
of all of Europe at the time set out to destroy the Abgenses and others.
To do this,
well two of those pillars are these.
The national credit would be in the hands of the federal government so therefore the
credit of this country is in the federal government as extended by the Federal
Reserve Bank which is a private bank.
Lewis versus U.S.
tells us this in a federal case.
So this private Federal Reserve Bank which is controlled by the Vatican through its
various orders particularly the old crusading orders like the Knights of Malta
and the Knights Templars which are today high level Freemasons they have put upon
us this horrible Federal Reserve Bank which is the Pope's bank to finance all
the Pope's crusades since no later than the Spanish-American War of 1898 to the
present.
In order to create a central bank certain obstacles had to be overcome.
First, those opposed to a central bank would need to be removed and secondly the
law would need to be changed or simply appear to be changed.
To deal with the troublesome individuals who opposed a central bank the Jesuits
spared no expense.
They built a ship of death called the Titanic.
The sinking of the Titanic was a design of the Jesuit order to get rid of the
opposition to the creation of a central bank in the United States.
And the men on the Titanic were opposed to a central bank.
They had to die.
Among those were John Jacob Astor Isidore Strauss Benjamin Guggenheim and a host of
other millionaires who were opposed to a central bank in America.
Therefore they had to be taken out of the way.
And they were on the Titanic.
The company building the ship was owned by J.P.
Morgan who was himself an agent of the Rothschilds family.
The Rothschilds being the bankers for the Pope and the Vatican.
The main Jesuit targets were brought on board.
The captain of the ship was Edward John Smith.
It appears from his actions that Captain Smith was a Jesuit coadjutor.
That is a Jesuit who has taken the oath but does not wear the robes.
A coadjutor blends into the scenery and never looks like a Jesuit priest.
It is a veteran sea captain Edward Smith who orders the ship to travel through an
80 square mile ice field at full speed on a moonless night.
There had been over 8 telegrams warning the captain of the danger.
He's warned 8 times slow the ship down, slow the Titanic down, you're going too
fast.
Not once stopped.
Knew there was an ice, you know, iceberg field up ahead.
Knew that he should have slowed down but didn't.
And so you look and you say, how was it that this man could go headlong into a
field of icebergs and not slow the ship down.
Not be more careful.
The only way you can, the only conclusion you can draw is as a coadjutor of the
Jesuit order, right through the line, the chain of command, he was told sink the
ship.
And he did.
On board the Titanic, and this is all documented in a National Geographic video
that was put out in 1986.
You can go to your local library and they'll either have it on hand or they can
get it on library loan.
But on that videotape it shows that as the Titanic was coming up along the coast of
England, it had various stops.
And at one stop, a Jesuit priest got on board.
His name was Francis Brown.
Francis Brown got on board the Titanic, took pictures of all of the wealthy
people, took pictures of Edward Smith, the captain, and then just before the
Titanic set sail across the Atlantic, Francis Brown got off.
And then, of course, the Titanic sunk.
Well, Francis Brown is given a camera by his bishop, his uncle, the bishop,
and he is told to go down and take all these pictures of all these people we're
going to kill in the first class.
So that's what he does.
He takes pictures of all these rich people, everybody that is there is going
to go down, and a rich passenger offers him passage.
Well, he knows the ship is going to go down, but he very sheepishly got in
contact with his provincial.
And the provincial's message was get off that ship.
Like Brown, another noted passenger, Jesuit agent J.P.
Morgan, did not make the ill-fated sea voyage.
Even though booked on the ship for passage to America, Morgan also fortuitously
canceled at the last minute.
Of course, J.P.
Morgan, he had his own suite reserved for him.
And there were some fifty-five men who at the last minute canceled their
reservations on the Titanic.
J.P.
Morgan was one of them.
Said he was sick.
Oh, by the way, don't load any of my art treasures on the Titanic either.
So he didn't have any of his art treasures on it either.
Didn't lose any of that.
How do we know there was foul play involved with the Titanic?
When the iceberg was sighted, it was First Officer Murdoch who attempted to port
around the deadly object.
This was sound enough, but Murdoch also ordered the engines into reverse.
Author Wynne Wade asked the obvious question.
As long as Murdoch was trying to veer out of the iceberg's way, why had he jammed on
the brakes, so to speak, by throwing the engines full speed astern?
In point of fact, the 1910 edition of Knight's Modern Seamanship clearly
contradicted Murdoch's decision.
The instructions are clear.
Avoid reversing the engines.
Wade sums up the situation by saying, Murdoch had maneuvered in a manner more
likely to cause collisions than to prevent them.
As with many who investigated the Titanic disaster, author Wynne Wade was at a loss
to explain Murdoch's actions in going against the book.
But the captain and Murdoch's actions were not the only tell-tale signs of treachery
on the night the Titanic sank.
We see all sorts of anomalies on the Titanic.
For example, when it was sinking, the emergency flares were to be red so
that the ships in those lanes could see the Titanic was in trouble.
Well, someone had taken away the red flares and replaced them with white
flares, making it look like we were shooting off flares and having a party.
And then the loading of the boats, we know that was a fraud.
They didn't allow the lifeboats to be completely loaded.
They were only half loaded.
Some one third loaded because the targets in the first class could not be allowed to
board.
And the Jesuits were not only the captain but his officers.
And there had been a strike in England at the time and the men who were normally the
ones who would man the ocean liners, they were replaced by Jesuit co-adjutors
ready to board because they were all under oath to die for the black pope if
necessary.
And so they did carry out the sinking of the Titanic.
But how is it possible that men will commit suicide as Captain Smith and some
of his hand-picked crew obviously did?
We have to understand that these men have died to their own self-will.
And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities and upon the
order of their commander will do exactly what they're told.
There's no such thing as a disobedient Jesuit.
This serves as a warning to all the other men of power, not only in our country but
in England and Europe.
You mess with us and we're going to do to you what we did to all those people on
Titanic and we're going to thwart the investigation.
Because a subsequent investigation of the sinking of Titanic blamed Bruce Ismay,
the right-hand man of J.P.
Morgan and Captain Lord of England.
They were the scapegoats when they could have easily blamed the men of power at
that time.
Saw who canceled their reservations.
It was a Warren Commission all over again.
9-11 Commission all over again.
It's a whitewash and cover-up and that cover-up is even more powerful than the
murder itself.
After many of the leading opponents to a central bank had been removed,
the Jesuits moved to obtain passage of the 16th Amendment and the Federal Reserve
Act, both in 1913.
So they created the Federal Reserve Bank to finance their crusades.
Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no war in Iraq.
Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no World War II.
There's no World War I.
And there's a book written by Katz called The Money Changers and in it he says that
it's the Federal Reserve Bank and the creators of all this paper currency,
fiat money, credit out of thin air.
Without that, you don't have these wars.
So, they needed the Federal Reserve Bank to create wars on heretic and liberal
peoples in Europe, so that they could restore the Pope's temporal power
throughout the European nations that was being thrown off in the 1800s.
Besides instigating wars and controlling the banking industry, the Jesuits have
spent a great deal of time and effort attacking and undermining their number one
enemy, the Bible, specifically the King James Bible.
As stated in Leone's The Secret Plan, the Jesuits view the Bible as a serpent
that must be made into a harmless rod.
In an effort to undermine the validity of the Bible, especially the book of Genesis,
the Jesuits promoted Charles Darwin's unproven theory of evolution.
Evolution theory postulates that man evolved or came about by chance.
There was no God or divine agent at work in creating the world.
All life had simply developed over time by mutations from a single cell that was
formed billions of years ago.
Supposedly, man himself had evolved from primitive ape-like creatures to his
present state.
When the evolutionary theory needed proof, of its validity, a young Jesuit priest by
the name of Pierre Teilhard Desjardins appeared on the scene.
In 1912, Teilhard assisted Charles Dawson at the digs in England where the Piltdown
Man was discovered.
This so-called missing link convinced most of the world that mankind had evolved from
more ape-like creatures.
It was not until forty years later that the Piltdown Man was discovered to be a
hoax.
Philip Johnson, in his book, Darwin on Trial, has this to say.
Many persons familiar with the evidence, including Stephen Jay Gould and Louis
Leakey, have concluded that Teilhard Desjardins was probably culpably involved
in preparing the Piltdown Fraud.
By the time Piltdown Man was exposed, a generation had been indoctrinated into
the belief that the evolutionary theory had a solid foundation in science.
The truth of the matter is that the evolutionary theory is questionable or bad
science with no solid foundations in truth.
To illustrate this fact, let's look at an exchange between author Luther Sunderland
and Dr. Colin Patterson.
Luther Sunderland was a creationist author and exponent.
In 1978, Dr. Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Museum of
Natural History in London, published a book entitled Evolution.
Sunderland wrote to Dr. Patterson and asked why the preeminent evolutionist had
not included any pictures of transitional fossils in his book.
Dr. Patterson candidly replied, I fully agree with your comments on the
lack of direct illustrations of evolutionary transitions in my book.
If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them.
You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations,
but where would he get the information from?
I could not, honestly, provide it.
And if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the
reader?
Like a bombshell, this statement by Dr. Patterson hit the evolutionary world and
enraged it.
Patterson sought to pacify his evolutionary colleagues, but he never
recanted.
To those who had a modicum of common sense, it was evident that the
evolutionary emperor was not wearing any clothes.
Evolution was just a theory that had no hard evidence to back it up.
In his 1996 book, Darwin's Black Box, Dr. Michael Behay made this rather pointed
observation.
In the face of the enormous complexity that modern biochemistry has uncovered in
the cell, the scientific community is paralyzed.
No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health,
no member of the National Academy of Sciences, no Nobel Prize winner,
no one at all can give a detailed account of how the psyllium, or vision,
or blood clotting, or any complex biochemical process might have developed
in a Darwinian fashion.
But in spite of this and other overwhelming evidence that the
evolutionary theory had no foundation in fact, the Vatican came out with an
extraordinary statement.
On October 22, 1996, the same year as Behay's book, Pope John Paul II,
issued a statement to the Pontifical Academy in which he said, New knowledge
has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than hypothesis.
This endorsement of evolution showed the true nature of the Vatican.
The God of the Bible had to be denied and relegated to the past.
The Jesuit plan to cast doubt on the Bible as God's word of truth had come a long
way.
But Darwin's theory of evolution was not their greatest achievement in undermining
Biblical authority.
The Jesuits set in motion an attack on the original Greek text of the Bible.
The New Testament was written in Greek.
For over 1,900 years, the Greek text of the Scriptures had endured and come down
to us as it was read by the first Christians.
To be sure, we now only have copies of copies of the originals, but the text has
remained the same.
Today, there are 5,686 Greek New Testament manuscripts in existence.
Of these manuscripts, the majority, over 90 percent, have been used over the
centuries as a basis for the text of the New Testament.
This majority text came out of Antioch in Syria.
Antioch became the headquarters for Christians of the first century,
and the majority text is often referred to as the Antiochian text.
Antioch is the Roman Empire.
Antioch is the But the authoritative line of manuscripts is more often called the
Textus Receptus, or Received Text.
The King James Version is based on the Received Text.
In the past, there have been attempts to alter the Received Text.
A group of Gnostic Christians, centered in Alexandria, Egypt,
altered some manuscripts in the third century.
The corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts downplayed the divinity of Jesus.
The famous scholar Origen seems to have had a hand in this undertaking.
However, the Christians of that time were not fooled.
In the fourth century, another attempt to pass on these same corrupted manuscripts
was led by the Roman Catholic scholar, Jerome.
Jerome made a translation of the Bible using the corrupted Alexandrian texts in
380 A.D.
Jerome called his translation the Vulgate.
Jerome's new translation was promoted by Rome, and those who did not use it were
punished for It was not until the Reformation that the uncorrupted received
texts was again used to translate God's Word into the common language.
The result was such translations as Luther's German New Testament of 1522,
Tyndale's English New Testament of 1526, the Geneva Bible of 1560, and the King
James Bible of 1611.
Since 1611, the King James Bible supplanted other English translations to
become the most renowned and cherished translations of Protestant Christians
throughout the world.
Then, in the late 1800's, two men worked to change that.
These two Biblical scholars were Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony
Hort.
Westcott and Hort created a new critical text based on the theory that the New
Testament was preserved almost perfectly in the two oldest manuscripts,
the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus.
The Sinaiticus manuscript was discovered in 1844 in a Roman Catholic monastery.
Facsimile copies of the Vaticanus manuscript were brought out of the Vatican
Library in the late 1800's.
Both of these manuscripts were from the corrupted Alexandrian line.
Using these two manuscripts as a foundation, Westcott and Hort began to put
together their Greek text of the New Testament in 1853.
In 1881, they completed and published their work.
According to Westcott and Hort, now for the first time the true text of
the New Testament was available to believers.
Significantly, it is from the Westcott and Hort Greek text that many modern Bible
translations have been produced.
And what has been the effect of this change to those in the pews listening to
the word of God?
With regard to John 118, we read in the King James version, No man has ever seen
God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father He
hath declared Him.
The same verse in the New International version, based on the Westcott and Hort
text reads, No one has ever seen God, but God the one and only, who is at the
Father's side, has made Him known.
Despite the somewhat confused rendering in the NIV, the change really amounts to
altering only begotten Son to the only begotten God.
The appearance of this alteration in a small body of text originating from the
veritable capital of Gnosticism, Alexandria, would suggest that the
Gnostics made their mark in these texts and at this verse.
Gnostics saw matter as evil and spirit as good.
God was spirit and could not be involved with wicked matter or flesh, especially in
the conception of a child.
To Gnostics, the virgin birth was an impossibility.
Another example of the corrupt influence of the Alexandrian manuscript was found in
Acts 2.30.
King David is spoken of in this verse as
The same verse in the New International Version, based on the Westcott Hort text,
reads,
This is a clear-cut example of the removal of a biblical statement concerning the
literal incarnation and physical descendants of Jesus Christ from David.
This is in line with many Gnostic systems, which viewed Christ as a purely spiritual
being —an aeon emanating from the everlasting.
The reading presented in the traditional text, where Christ in the flesh is said to
be in physical descendants from David, would be antithetical to these speculative
systems.
There are many other examples that can be used to illustrate the point that the
Westcott and Hort Greek text holds contrary views to the doctrines and
teachings of the majority of the existing Greek manuscripts.
Unfortunately, most Christians today are ignorant of this and still rely on the
corrupt Westcott and Hort Greek text.
Since they have had such an impact on the biblical text, from which many modern
translations come, it might be helpful to know more about Westcott and Hort.
Supposedly, these men were Protestants.
Specifically, they were Anglican or Church of England scholars.
Moreover, unlike what one would expect from a believer in the truth of the Word
of God, Westcott did not believe that the first three chapters of Genesis should be
taken literally.
In a letter to Hort, Westcott stated, No one now, I suppose, holds that the
first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history.
I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think
they did.
Westcott also doubted the miracle stories in the Bible.
He stated, I never read an account of a miracle, but I seem instinctively to feel
its improbability.
But even more telling is Westcott's devotion to John Henry Newman.
Newman, along with several other Church of England clergymen, began the Oxford
Movement in 1833.
The purpose of this secret movement was to reunite the Church of England with the
Roman Catholic Church.
That same year, a clandestine meeting was held in Rome between John Henry Newman,
Richard Frode, and Monsignor Wiseman.
When asked what it would take for the Church of England to be accepted back into
the Roman Catholic Church, Monsignor Wiseman answered, the Church of England
must accept the Council of Trent in its entirety.
Consider that.
In 1833, the spokesman for the papacy brings up the acceptance of the Council of
Trent as the main condition for reuniting with Rome.
The Council of Trent met and declared 125 anathemas against the Protestant
Reformation.
The Pope and the Jesuits had not changed their minds then or to this day.
For 12 years, Newman and his colleagues worked secretly to push the Church of
England back into the arms of the papacy.
When this secret society and its intentions were discovered, Newman and 150
followers defected to the Roman Church.
It is apparent that Westcott was one of Newman's disciples.
He did not defect, but rather remained as a tool of Rome.
Westcott's scholastic partner and pupil, Fenton John Anthony Hort, was no better in
his biblical faith.
Although Hort doubted the existence of a literal devil and of eternal punishment
for the godless, he did believe in the Roman Catholic concept of purgatory.
Hort stated that the idea of purgation, of cleansing as by fire, seems to me
inseparable from what the Bible teaches us of the divine chastisements.
Hort also adhered to the Roman Catholic teaching of baptismal regeneration.
Hort stated, We maintain baptismal regeneration as the most important of
doctrines.
The pure Romish view seems to me nearer and more likely to lead to the truth than
the evangelical.
These false teachers worked ceaselessly to undermine the King James version of the
Bible, and install new Bible versions more acceptable to the Vatican.
Bible versions like the Revised Standard Version, the American Standard Version,
the Living Bible, and the New International Version of the Bible.
As mentioned earlier, the NIV is based on the Westcott-Hort Greek text, and its
successor, the Nessel-Alan Greek text.
A Jesuit translator, Carlo Cardinal Martini, was on the translation committee
for the NIV.
For this supposedly Protestant translation of the Bible, a representative of a group
sworn to destroy Protestants sat on the committee that created a Protestant Bible.
So, is this really a Protestant Bible?
Once doubt had sufficiently been cast on the Bible and its veracity, the Jesuits
knew the public would be less inclined to rise up in protest, as more open and
drastic measures were taken to suppress the true Word of God.
In the 1962 Engel v.
Vitale case, the U.S.
Supreme Court voted that prayer in public school was unconstitutional.
Why?
Because it violated the First Amendment.
Prayer in school had not violated the First Amendment for 175 years,
but suddenly it did?
The following year, in the case of Abington v.
Shemp, the Supreme Court voted that the reading of the Bible was also a violation
of the First Amendment.
How did the Supreme Court arrive at these decisions?
One only has to know that the Chief Justice of the Court, Earl Warren,
was a Freemason, to see why the Court voted as it did.
And why did the President and Congress not impeach these Supreme Court Justices and
remove them from the Court?
The answer is simple.
The President and Congress agreed with the decision.
Otherwise, these godless Justices would have been impeached and removed.
How did this happen?
First, in the 1950s, churches began to incorporate and organize as tax-exempt
organizations.
Churches had always been tax exempt, but now they could offer their
congregations tax deductions for tithes and offerings.
It was Senator Lyndon Baines' Johnson who pushed for the churches to be added to the
Section 501c3 of the tax code.
For a 501c3 church to openly speak out or organize in opposition to anything that
the government declares legal, even if it is completely immoral,
the church will jeopardize its tax-exempt status.
The 501c3 has had a chilling effect upon the free speech rights of the church.
Another reason why important for the demise of the Protestant churches in
America was that church pulpits and leadership had been infiltrated and
subverted by Freemasons and Jesuit coadjutors.
It was at this time, the late 50s and early 60s, that the Second Vatican Council
met and set new goals for achieving old purposes.
Vatican II fits right in harmony with the Council of Trent because what you have is
at Trent, the Catholic Church said, we will not compromise with Protestantism.
And so, between Trent in the 1540s and Vatican II from 1958 to 1963, you have
Jesuit infiltration of all the churches so that finally, by 1958 to 1963,
there's been enough infiltration done and enough of the messages of those churches
have been watered down.
So now, Rome comes in with the ecumenical movement.
That's what John XXIII did at Vatican II.
It was, let's bring all the churches together now, but it's not under
Protestantism, it's not under biblical truth and principle, it's under Rome.
And it's under Roman tradition and Roman authority.
That's all Vatican II was.
So, Vatican II fits right in harmony with Alberto Rivera and his statement that all
the churches by 1981 were completely taken over.
What is the ultimate goal of the papacy?
What is it that has not changed since the meetings in Vienna, Verona, and Cherie in
the early 1800s?
The answer is domination of the world.
The Vatican is seeking to create a one-world government or new world order.
And what will be the capital of this world government?
Not Rome, but Jerusalem.
In 1993, the Italian newspaper La Stampa carried a curious article that said the
Vatican had gained control of a portion of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
They want their capital back.
The crusades haven't ended.
They've done this before.
It's not a new phenomenon here.
What the Vatican wants is...
Rome is their second capital.
They want a crusade to liberate what they view as their actual physical capital.
And that's where they don't want Jews in Jerusalem.
What they were trying to do with this war now is take an eraser to all of these
countries.
Now you have no more countries.
One massive trading block.
In the middle of this, you've got a city that is revered big time.
The papacy has wanted to move from Rome to Jerusalem ever since the very first
crusade.
They still want to do that.
And how do we know this?
We know this because a person named Marek Halter, the French intellectual friend of
Schuman Paris, gave an interview in a now defunct magazine, where he said,
in May of 1993, I delivered a letter to the Pope, Schuman Paris, promising the
Vatican East Jerusalem.
And he gave a few details.
East Jerusalem would be policed by the UN.
The Vatican would get control of all holy sites of all religions.
And the PLO would get a state within this enclave.
The Vatican gets the control of all holy sites, and the UN gets the police the
place.
And now we've got two magazine confirmations.
And Arafat agreed to this.
According to the staff, three days before the signing of the Declaration of
Principles, Arafat agreed to the deal.
And then when he didn't get the deal, the terror started in earnest.
If you do not bow down to the Jesuit-controlled Roman Catholic leader,
you are a heretic, and you must die.
These are the words of the celebrated St. Thomas Aquinas.
On the part of the Church, however, there is mercy, which looks to the
conversion of the wanderer, wherefore she condemns not at once, but after the first
and second admonition, as the Apostle directs.
After that, if he is yet stubborn, the Church, no longer hoping for his
conversion, looks to the salvation of others, by excommunicating him and
separating him from the Church, and furthermore delivers him to the
secular tribunal, to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.
During the Chinoquy trial, Abraham Lincoln put Bishop Foley on the stand.
The bishop was forced to admit that St. Thomas was looked upon as one of the
highest authorities.
In fact, the Roman Catholic bishop swore that God himself had inspired what St.
Thomas had written about the manner in which heretics should be treated by the
Roman Catholics.
If the Vatican has its way, the future for all who speak out against the Pope,
or who do not go along with the goals of the Jesuits, is one of torture and death.
This has been the fate of the like Confederate General Stonewall Jackson,
those against the Central Bank on the Titanic, ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera.
In the Jesuit Oath, the Jesuit states, I will, when opportunity presents,
make and openly against all heretics, Protestants, and liberals, as I am
directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the
whole earth.
In light of all that has been exposed in this documentary, what is to be done?
First and foremost, Christians should seek the Lord's guidance through daily prayer
and Bible study.
We should pray for a new Reformation, not a false revival, nor one that
piggybacks on a political movement, or even one that tries to take control of
the existing Antichrist, Republican, and Democrat parties.
But rather, a Reformation that emphasizes the God of the Bible, a Bible based on the
Textus Receptus, like the King James Version.
Secondly, the Bible tells Christians to separate ourselves from evil.
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers.
And in the same chapter, verse 17, Wherefore, come out from among them,
and be ye separate, saith the Lord.
We should seek for a peaceful separation, or secession, from the American Empire.
We want to go back to a typical constitutional Protestant form of
government that was isolationist.
We kept our noses out of the businesses of other nations, and we sought to develop
our own country.
George Bush has called the United States Constitution a G.D.
piece of paper, and he's called this present war a crusade, which it is.
So, it's all the more reason to secede.
We're never going to get any relief.
We need to have a move in every state for a secession, where we can begin to
withdraw from Rome and the Potomac, which is Washington, and we can
re-establish state, national government once again, and begin to govern our own
affairs for what's best for that population or those populations in those
states.
And if we wish, we can then confederate together with other states, but we don't
have to.
Christians should not only avoid the poisons of this world, but also the false
churches in the land.
We should not attend Bible-believing churches that are not incorporated and
thus controlled by the government.
If you cannot find a Bible-believing congregation in your area, start a house
church yourself, with your family, or with other people in your community.
Christians should shine light on the evil we see, and speak out against it.
In Ephesians we read, And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of
darkness, but rather expose them.
Do not be timid, but speak out about what is clearly unbiblical and evil in this
country.
And finally, be aware of deceivers and deceptions.
Jesus warned of false prophets with lying tongues.
In Matthew 24 verse 11 we read, And many false prophets shall rise and
shall deceive many.
In 1 Timothy the apostle Paul wrote, Now the Spirit speaketh expressly that in
the latter times some shall depart from the faith giving heed to seducing spirits
and doctrines of devils.
As we move closer to the second coming of Christ, we should be vigilant and hold
steadfast to the true faith as found in the scriptures leaning on the Holy Spirit
to empower us against false doctrine and wicked men.
God's word does not tell us to make war on other countries, to bring them democracy,
or to do nation building.
These lies need to be denounced.
The Jesuits will not stop in their quest for world dominion and the setting up of a
new world order.
Christians are to resist this Antichrist system and be the light of the world.
As the light shines, it reveals the truth, and the dark creatures of this world
retreat from it.