Black Pope and his murder men, an exposure of the Jesuits.
Recently at a press conference in the Stormont Parliament buildings,
I dealt with a political statement made by Bishop Cathal Galey of the Roman Catholic
hierarchy in Ireland.
The Bishop had put forth four propositions.
Number one, that Mrs Thatcher the British Prime Minister's out, out, out statement
rejecting the proposals of the New Ireland Forum for a united Ireland played into the
hands of the IRA.
Two, that all Unionists who rejoiced at that statement should be bracketed with
the IRA as extremists.
Three, that Roman Catholics in Northern Ireland were denied real rights and
democracy.
Four, that the Dublin government had just as much right in the North as had the
British government.
That final proposition, by the way, is a treasonable doctrine which would
morally justify an invasion by the South of the North of Ireland.
Commenting, I called the Bishop the Black Pope of the Republican movement.
The press men present threw up their hands in seeming horror, but none of them knew
who the Black Pope was.
I explained that the Black Pope was a name given to the head of the Jesuit order,
the most powerful order within the Roman Catholic system.
In an aside, I might say that the Bishop should have felt very pleased that I had
elevated him so high up in the hierarchy of the church to which he belonged.
Then, when I explained to the press who the Black Pope really was, the head of the
Jesuits, they again said, who are the Jesuits?
And I described them as the Gestapo of the Roman Catholic church, the front men who
carry out the Pope's orders throughout Christendom.
Again, the press men represented threw up their hands in seeming horror and said
this was a terrible thing to say about any order within the Roman Catholic church.
But what are the facts?
I quote from the secret history of the Jesuits by Edmund Pallas.
I'm giving a quotation from the reform which is what the press of the Spanish
dictator Franco published on the 3rd of May 1945, the day of Hitler's death.
Quote, Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic church, died while defending Christianity.
It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his death
when so many were found to exalt his life.
Over his mortal remains stands his victorious moral figure.
With the palm of the martyr, God gives Hitler the laurels of victory.
End of the quotation.
Then in page 166 of the same book, we read the statement of Walter
Schellenberg, former chief of German counter-espionage, who had the complete
confidence of Hitler.
After the war, Schellenberg wrote, quote, the SS organization, that is the
Gestapo, had been constituted by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuits
order.
Their regulations and the spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola
were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly.
The Reichsführer SS, Himmler's title as supreme chief of the SS, was to be the
equivalent of the Jesuits general.
End of the quotation.
Let me give a final quotation from the leading Jesuit, Michael Skourmios,
who eventually became a cardinal in the church.
He says, the National Socialist Movement, that is the fascist movement of Hitler,
is the most vigorous and massive protest against the spirit of the 19th and 20th
centuries.
A compromise between the Catholic faith and liberal thinking is impossible.
Nothing is more contrary to Catholicism than democracy.
The reawakened meaning of strict authority opens up again the way to the real
interpretation of ecclesiastical authority.
The mistrust of liberty is founded on the Catholic doctrine of original sin.
The National Socialist Commandments and those of the Catholic Church have the same
aim.
End of the quotation.
These quotations alone prove conclusively that my definition of the Jesuits was a
correct one.
As a result of this controversy, many questions have been asked,
and of course a whole series of attacks have been made upon my person and also
upon my staff.
So I believe it is incumbent upon me to deal with the Jesuits, to say something of
their history, something of their doctrines, and something of their program.
On one of the walls of the church of the Jesuits in Rome, there is a unique plaster
cast.
It depicts one of the saints of the Roman Catholic Church, Ignatius Loyola himself,
with his foot on the neck of Protestantism.
In St. Peter's itself, there is a colossal idol of the same Roman saint.
He is depicted there in monkish gown and cowl.
A large open book rests on his left arm.
On the first page are the words in Latin, to the greater glory of God.
On the opposite page also in Latin, Constitutions of the Society of Jesus.
The devil stands before him with a Jesuit's face, hair divided as long
tongues of fire, left hand clenched and held close to the mouth, while the right
holds a closed book with the fingers within it.
A serpent with awful head and teeth is beneath.
These two pieces of a Roman idolatrous sculpture are very significant.
This Roman manufactured saint, Ignatius Loyola, was the founder of the
Jesuit order, or the Society of Jesus, as he blasphemously called it.
Its purpose is to stamp on the neck of Protestantism.
The idol in St. Peter's has monk, devil and serpent united.
Excellent representatives of the devilish character of the Jesuit.
Every Jesuit is outwardly a monk, inwardly a devil and altogether a serpent.
It is the Jesuits who control Rome's ecumenical movement.
When the second Pope John XXIII set up the Vatican Secretariat for unity,
he named Cardinal Bia, a German Jesuit, its president.
This is deeply significant.
As a leading Jesuit Cardinal, Bia had at his disposal the greatest spy ring in
Europe.
His own society to feed back to him all the vital information concerning the
leadership and vulnerability of the great Protestant denominations, which he was
aiming to subvert to the papacy.
Bia's success was astounding.
Archbishop Fischer visited the Pope and appointed in association with his
successor, Archbishop Ramsey, then Archbishop of York, one canon poly of Ely
Cathedral, to be personal representative of Canterbury and York and the Secretariat
over which Bia presides in Rome.
Cardinal Bia was also received at Lambert Palace by Dr. Ramsey, and no doubt from
the Vatican side, was responsible for Dr. Ramsey's visit to the Pope.
Those visits herald a succession of visits by Archbishops of Canterbury.
Dr. Fischer was the first in a long queue of professed Protestant church leaders who
lined up at the Vatican to slapper on the Pope's slippers.
These included Dr. Jackson of the Southern Baptist Convention of the United States of
America, Dr. Lichtenberger, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church of the USA,
a President of the British Methodist Conference, and Dr. A.
C.
Craig, Moderator of the Church of Scotland.
In Ireland, another Jesuit priest, Michael Hurley, was the leader in
subverting the main Protestant denominations to Rome.
As far back as 1963, he issued a book called, Praying for Unity, in which he
made it crystal clear that the ultimate purpose of the January week of prayer was
the union of all Protestant denominations with Rome under the sovereign leadership
of the Pope.
His Jesuitical cunning was demonstrated by his success in obtaining for his book
introductory messages by George Otto Sims, Church of Ireland, Archbishop of Dublin at
that time, W.
A.
Montgomery, Moderator of the Irish Presbyterian Church at that time,
and Frederick E.
Hill, President of the Irish Methodist Church at that time.
The only Protestant church in Ireland attacked by this Jesuit production was the
Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster, of which I am honored to be moderator.
One of the contributors was priest Dennis Fall, soon to be known as the infamous
Republican apologist and revider of the Royal Ulster Constabulary.
As can be expected, the book was the usual concoction of lies in which all Jesuits
revel.
We wrote to the author, challenging him on the issue, but he couldn't even reply.
He couldn't answer.
He was a peddler of lies.
Of course, any man who blasphemously claims to turn a pancake or wafer in the
mass into Jesus Christ and forgive sins could write or claim anything.
What has been described by the Church of Ireland Gazette as a representative
ecumenical gathering in Drogheda was organized by the same Jesuit Hurley.
The meeting was held in a convent school of the Roman Catholic Presentation Sisters
and clergy of the Irish Episcopal Church, the Church of Ireland, the Irish
Presbyterian Church and the Irish Methodist Church joined with Romanists in
unity discussions.
Two Irish Presbyterian professors, Barclay and Macfadyen, took a prominent
part in that discussion.
A few days later, the hypocrite Professor Barclay wrote to the press declaring there
was no retreat to Rome.
How naive does he think Ulster Protestants are?
In England, the Jesuit Thomas Corbishley was the leader.
The fact that he preached from the pulpit of Westminster Abbey showed how powerful
his influence was.
The tremendous protest in which we had the honor of taking part must have been a very
bitter pill for him to swallow.
The far-reaching effect of that protest can be gauged from the following extract
of the National Daily Paper of the Sun.
I quote from January the 24th, 1966.
Today the Pope told more than 7,000 pilgrims gathered in St. Peter's Square.
We must pray for the unity of all separated Christians.
As you know, the problem of the union of all Christians is of grave importance and
great immediacy.
But we must confront it, even if it gives rise to some many difficulties,
and perhaps the hour is near.
The paper comments the Pope's words about so many difficulties.
Some Vatican officials believe may have referred to such incidents as the one in
London on Friday night, when a group of die-hard Protestants demonstrated outside
Westminster Abbey while a Jesuit priest was preaching there.
The Anglican Bishop Hudson of Harryport joined the Jesuit Corbusier at a unity
service in Birmingham.
Later I debated Corbusier at Queen's University.
In the light of these facts, that the Jesuits spearheaded Rome's ecumenical
movement to take over the main Protestant denominations, we would do well to take a
closer view of the Jesuits and their working, especially in view of the storm
of protest that has come about when I called Carol Daly the Black Pope of the
Republican movement.
We will consider then the start, the sign, the system, the secrecy,
and the strategy of the Jesuits.
First then, the start of the Jesuits.
Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus, was born eight years
after the great German reformer, Martin Luther.
He belonged to an ancient Spanish family.
He became a soldier and was severely wounded in one engagement in which he
greatly distinguished himself.
During the tedious illness resulting from his wound, he read Roman Catholic
literature.
This resulted in his embracing a stern asceticism.
For a time he lived in a cave and took to extreme penances.
This led to morbid broodings.
His imagination ran riot.
On one occasion we are informed he saw the Holy Spirit in the form of three notes
closely bound together hanging on a stalk.
And to his holy eyes, moreover, the host was transformed into the true
God-man.
The fanaticism resulting from such visions inspired Ignatius and his followers to
diabolical deeds on behalf of the Roman Catholic system.
During this time, Loyola conceived the plan of a new society which was to combat
the Reformation.
On August the 15th, 1534, Ignatius and six associates dedicated themselves in the
crypt of the Notre Dame de Montmartre.
In 1537, they offered themselves to the Pope and declared that they would raise a
mighty army of holy knights whose sole aim would be to overthrow all the enemies of
the Church of Rome.
Pope Paul III gladly accepted their services, especially as the order swore
explicit military obedience, not merely canonical, to him and gave all its
services entirely without money and without price.
A papal bull which bore the title, Praise to the Government of the Church
Militant, constituted the order on September the 27th, 1540.
The bull declared that the persons enrolled were constituted an army to bear
the standard of the cross, to wield the arms of God, to serve the only Lord God
and the Roman pontiff, his vicar on earth.
So started the most murderous and diabolical society to whom the Roman
harlot ever gave birth.
Secondly, the sign of the Jesuits.
When the original group met in the crypt of Notre Dame de Montmartre, rose from
their knees, Ignatius pointed to the letters on the altar, IHS.
These stand for Jesus, Hamanon, Salvatore, Jesus the Savior of mankind,
and they shall henceforth be the model of our institution.
IHS is the sign of the Jesuits.
These letters do not stand for what Ignatius affirmed.
They are in fact the pagan mystical symbol of the Egyptian trinity.
Isis, Horus, and Zeb, the mother, child, and father of the gods.
No honest person could imagine that this double sense is accidental.
IHS pay the semblance of a tribute to Christianity, but they are in reality the
substance of devil worship.
A cloven hoof is upon them.
I would advise everyone to read Hyslop's Two Babylons on this subject.
Yes, and whenever these mystic letters, IHS, the sign of the Jesuits are found,
be sure that sooner or later those using them will be revealed as doing the work of
the Jesuits.
These are the first symbols erected in Protestant churches by the Romanizing
clergy.
Let them be kept out of every Protestant church, for the substance will follow the
sign as sure as night follows day.
Three, the system of the Jesuits.
The Jesuitical system is one of dissimulation, hypocrisy, and immorality.
A book called the Secreta Monitor, a copy of which is in the British Museum,
contains instructions for the operation of the Jesuit system.
The book is a masterpiece of diabolical deception.
As might be expected, the book has been repudiated by the Jesuits.
In its 18th chapter, it states curiously enough that this repudiation must take
place if it should be discovered.
The evidence of the genuineness of the book is incomparable.
What is more, the Jesuits have always worked along the lines laid down in its
corrupting pages.
Jesuitism has three great governing principles.
One, the doctrine of probability.
Two, the doctrine of philosophical sin.
Three, the doctrine of the direction of attention.
One, the doctrine of probability.
The Jesuits interpretation of it is that when, upon any moral question,
two different opinions are entertained by any celebrated casuist, of which opinions
the one is more probable and in conformity with the law, the other less probable but
more agreeable to our desires, we may lawfully put the latter in
practice.
Even of two contradictory probable opinions, says the Jesuit Paul Lehmann,
touching the legality or illegality of any human action, everyone may follow in
practice or in action that which he should prefer, although it may appear to the
agent himself less probable in theory.
The Jesuit Gasnevi goes further even than this, for he says that whosoever says that
the law is not binding cannot sin.
In other words, any plausible excuse whatever is a sufficient excuse for sin.
Secondly, the doctrine of philosophical sin.
By this doctrine the Jesuits mean any action contrary to the dictates of nature
and right reason may be done by a person who is ignorant of the written law of God
or doubtful of its meaning.
Ignorance or doubt therefore, according to this doctrine, alters the character of
sin.
Three, the doctrine of the attention.
The meaning of this doctrine is that actions intrinsically evil and directly
contrary to the divine laws may be innocently performed by those who have so
much power over their own minds as to join even ideally a good end to the wicked
action contemplated.
That is to say that a man only stifle his conscience or divert his thoughts for the
time from his sin to some other object or seek some good end and he may do what he
will.
By these doctrines the Jesuits and their writings show how every one of the ten
commandments can be broken without sin.
It was Cardinal Manning running true to Jesuitical principles who said of the
authors of the Jesuit gunpowder plot, while on earth they wore the garb of
felons, in heaven they stand arrayed in white and crowned.
Here they are arrayed in a dock as malefactors.
There they sit by the throne of the Son of God.
The late Lord Palmerston once said, the presence of the Jesuits in any
country, Catholic or Protestant, is likely to breed social disturbance.
A French Roman Catholic priest, Arnold, warned, do you wish to provoke
revolution?
To produce the total ruin of your country, call in the Jesuits.
The character of the order can be proved by the historical fact that up to the year
1860, no fewer than 70 times it had been expelled from countries in which it had
been working.
What is more, in 1773, Pope Clement XIV abolished the order altogether.
Pope Clement met with a cruel death as a result.
In 1814, Pope Pius VII restored the order, declaring that, if any should again
attempt to abolish it, he would incur the indignation of Almighty God and of the
Holy Apostles Peter and Paul.
Jesuitry has spawned the whole of the Irish Republican murder movement.
The IRA has been taught and has imbibed its principles.
Let me give you three quotations from leading Jesuit theologians.
Martin Beacon, in his work on theology, has the following passage.
Every subject may kill his prince when the latter has taken possession of the throne
as a usurper.
And history teaches, in fact, that in all nations, those who kill such tyrants are
treated with the greatest honor.
But even when the ruler is not a usurper, but a prince who has by right come to the
throne, he may be killed as soon as he oppresses his subjects with improper
taxation, sells the judicial offices, and issues ordinances in a tyrannical
manner for his own particular benefit.
End of the quotation.
Turn over the tape now.
Second quotation.
Paul Comitolo, an Italian Jesuit, in his book on morals, says, It is
allowable to kill an illegal aggressor, even be he a general, prince, or king,
as innocence has more value than the life of a fellow creature.
And a ruler who maltreats the citizens ought to be annihilated as a wild,
cruel beast.
End of quotation.
Third quotation.
Father Herman Buchenbaum, a leading Jesuit, in his book on moral theology,
says that permission to murder all offenders of mankind and the true faith,
as well as enemies of the society of Jesus, is freely given.
Father Buchenbaum is held by all of society as the writer of an unsurpassed
and unsurpassable pattern book, and was on that account introduced with
the approval of the Jesuit general into all their colleges.
I commend to my hearers the famous history of the Jesuits.
The Jesuits, a complete history, are their open and secret proceedings from
the foundation of the order to the present time.
Told to the German people by Theodor Gessinger, and translated by A.J.
Scott, M.D.
I'm quoting from the third edition published in London in 1892.
Those three quotations show up clearly the principles of the Jesuit order.
Those very principles, taught in Roman Catholic schools and churches,
have spawned the Irish Republican Army.
The many statements of that terrorist organization, justifying their campaign of
murder, are but echoes of the principles of the Jesuit order.
We turn now to the secret of the Jesuits.
My fourth point.
Bishop Wordsworth, an eminent Church of England divine, and for some years the
Bishop of Lincoln, uncovers the secrecy of the Jesuits in the exposure of a document
used by them in their early days to compel Protestants to submit to Mother Church.
This makes very illuminating reading.
Roman Catholic confession, publicly prescribed and proposed to Protestants on
their admission to the Roman Catholic Church.
One, we confess that we have been brought from heresy to the true saving Roman
Catholic faith by the singular care of our supreme governors, spiritual and temporal,
and by the diligence and aid of our masters, the fathers of the order of
Jesuits.
And we desire to certify this by our vows to the world at large.
Two, we confess that the Pope of Rome is head of the Church and cannot err.
Three, we confess and are certain that the Pope of Rome is Vicar of Christ and has
penury power of remitting and retaining the sins of all men according to his will,
of thrusting them down to hell, and of excommunicating them.
Four, we confess that whatever new thing the Pope ordains, whether it be in
Scripture or not in Scripture, and whatever he commands is divine,
and therefore ought to be held by lay people in greater esteem than the precepts
of the living God.
Five, we confess that the most holy Pope ought to be honored by all with divine
honor, with greater genuflection due to Christ himself.
Six, we confess and assert that the Pope as our most holy father is to be obeyed in
all things without any exception, and that such heretics as contravene his
orders are not only to be burnt, but to be delivered body and soul to hell.
Seven, we confess that the reading of Holy Scripture is the origin of heresy and
schism and the source of blasphemy.
Eight, we confess that to invoke saints, male and female, to honor their images,
to kneel before them, to make pilgrimage to them, to light candles to them,
is good, pious, holy, and useful.
Nine, we confess that every priest is much greater than the mother of God,
the blessed Virgin Mary, who once brought forth Christ, and once only.
But a priest of Rome, not only when he wills, but whenever he wills, offers and
creates Christ, and consumes him when created.
Ten, we confess that to celebrate masses, and to distribute alms, and to pray for
the dead, is useful.
Eleven, we confess that the Pope has power of changing Scripture, and of adding to
it, and taking from it according to his will.
Twelve, we confess that souls after death are purified in purgatory, and that the
masses of priests are useful to deliver them from it.
Thirteen, we confess that to receive the Eucharist under one kind is good and
salutary, and to receive it under both is heretical and damnable.
Fourteen, we confess and assert that they who receive under one kind receive the
whole Christ with flesh and blood, with the divinity of both.
But that they who receive under both only enjoy and eat their bread.
Fifteen, we confess that there are seven true and real sacraments.
Sixteen, we confess that God is honored in images, and through them is acknowledged
by man.
Seventeen, we confess that Mary the Blessed Virgin is worthy of greater honor
than men and angels, than Christ himself, the Son of God.
Eighteen, we confess that the Blessed Virgin Mary is Queen of Heaven,
and reigns together with her Son, and that her Son ought to act in all
things according to her will.
Nineteen, we confess that the bones of the saints have great virtue, and therefore
ought to be honored by men, and chapels ought to be built for them.
Twenty, we confess that the Roman doctrine is Catholic, pure, divine, saving,
ancient, and true.
And the Protestant, false, erroneous, blasphemous, accursed, heretical,
pernicious, seditious, and fabulous.
Since, therefore, entirely and fully, in all its developments, the Roman
doctrine under one kind is good and sacred, therefore we curse all those who
brought us up in the country in pious heresy under both kinds.
We pronounce our parents accursed who educated us in that heretical faith.
We curse those, also, who excited in us any doubts concerning the Roman Catholic
faith, and those, also, who served us with that accursed cup.
Yea, we curse ourselves, and pronounce ourselves accursed, because we partook in
that heretical cup, which we ought not to have tasted.
Twenty-one, we confess that Holy Scripture is imperfect, and a dead letter,
until it is explained by the supreme pontiff, and allowed by him to be read by
the laity.
Twenty-two, we confess that one mass of a Roman priest is more useful than a hundred
and more Protestant sermons.
Therefore, we curse those books which we have read, containing that heretical and
blasphemous doctrine.
We extend our curse to all our own works, performed by us in heresy, that they may
not bring anything upon us in the last day in the divine presence.
All these things we do with sincere heart, affirming that the Church of Rome,
in these unlike articles, is most true, with a solemn recantation of that other
heretical doctrine, in your hearing, honorable men and matrons, young men and
virgins, who are here present.
We swear also that we will never return to the heresy under both kinds, as long as we
live, although it were allowed, or shall be allowed to us to do so.
We swear also that as long as a drop of blood remains in our veins, we will
persecute that accursed Protestant doctrine, by all means in our power,
secretly and openly, by violence and stratagem, by word and deed, even with the
sword.
Finally, we swear, in the divine presence, and in that of angels and of yourselves,
that we will never depart from this saving and divine Roman Catholic Church,
and never will return to the accursed Protestant heresy, nor embrace it.
This is the true face of Jesuitry.
No wonder Nicolae, the historian of the order, states, draw the character of the
Jesuit as he seems in London, and you will not recognize the portrait of the Jesuit
in Rome.
The Jesuit is a man of circumstances, despotic in Spain, constitutional in
England, Republican in Paraguay, bigot in Rome, idolater in India.
He will assume and act out in his own person, all those different features by
which men are usually distinguished from each other.
He will accompany the gay women of the world to the theater, and will share in
the excess of the debauchee.
With solemn countenance, he will take his place by the side of the religious man of
church, or revel in the tavern with the gluttoner He dresses in all garbs,
speaks all languages, knows all customs, is present everywhere, though nowhere
recognized.
And all this it would seem, oh monstrous blasphemy for the greater glory of God.
The Jesuits backed the Inquisition with all its barbarous and elaborate system of
tortures, and murders, putting to death millions of people.
The Jesuits reckoned it among the glories of their order, that Loyola himself
supported by a special memorial to the Pope, a petition to reorganize that cruel
and abhorred tribunal, the Inquisition.
Under the shadow of that hellish monster, the infernal flames of the most vile
persecution were stoked, while the Jesuits looked on with a sinister and diabolical
smile across their faces.
The Jesuitical oath, which of course they deny, but nevertheless faithfully practice
its obligation, is as follows.
I now in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Blessed St.
John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints,
sacred hosts of heaven, and to you my ghostly Father, the Superior General of
the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of
Paul III, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix
of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that His Holiness the
Pope is Christ's Vice-Regent, and is the true and only head of the Catholic or
Universal Church throughout the world.
And that by virtue of the keys of binding and lucent, given to His Holiness by our
Savior Jesus Christ, He have power to depose heretical kings, princes,
states, commonwealths, and governments, all being illegal, without His sacred
confirmation, and they may be safely destroyed.
Therefore to the utmost of my power, I will defend this doctrine and His
Holiness' right and custom against the usurpers of the heretical or Protestant
authority whatsoever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland,
Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the now pretending authority of churches of
England and Scotland, and the branches of the same now established in Ireland,
and on the continent of America, and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard
that they may be usurped, and heretical, opposing the Sacred Mother Church of Rome.
I do now denounce and disown any allegiance, as due to any heretical king,
prince, or state, named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their
laws, magistrates, or officers.
I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland,
of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protestants or Liberals,
to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same.
I do further declare that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of His
Holiness' agents in any place where I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany,
Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland, or America, or in any
other kingdom or territory, I shall come to, and do my utmost to extirpate the
heretical Protestant or Liberal doctrines, to destroy all their pretended powers,
legal or otherwise.
I do further promise and declare that notwithstanding, I am dispensed with to
assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church's
interests, to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time as
they entrust me, and not to divulge directly or indirectly, by word or
circumstance whatever, but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge,
or discovered unto me by you, my ghostly Father, or any of this sacred convent.
I do further promise and declare that I will have no option or will of my own,
or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse, but will unhesitatingly
obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia
of the Pope and of Jesus Christ, that I will go to any part of the world
whithersoever I shall be sent.
End of the Jesuitical oath.
We come now finally to the strategy of the Jesuits.
Their first strategy is to completely control the papacy.
Since their restoration in 1814, the Jesuits have sought to control the
papacy.
This they have largely succeeded in accomplishing.
So great is the power of the General of the Order, that as we have seen,
he is called not only by Protestants, but by Roman Catholics the Black Pope.
He is in fact the Pope maker or breaker, as the case may be.
Many of the influential societies of the Church are subservient to the Jesuits.
Among these are the Redemptorists, a sub-order of the Jesuits, who act
willingly or unwillingly as the Serving Brothers, the Roadmakers and the Laborers
for the Jesuits.
The St. Vinci de Paul Society, the Brothers of Christian Doctrine,
the Brothers of the Congregation of the Holy Virgin, beside many female branches
in schools, convents and hospitals throughout the whole world.
Second strategy, infiltration.
Dean Good in his book, Rome's Tactics, ably deals with the Jesuit infiltration of
the Church of England.
He shows how Jesuits have become professedly members and ministers in the
Church of England, that in the guise of Anglican priests and laymen, they might
undermine the Protestantism of that Church.
For their work in this direction, they have been praised by the papacy.
The other main Protestant churches have also been infiltrated in the same way,
and their takeover by Rome, carefully prepared for.
The third strategy, conditioning.
By character assassination, they seek to silence every voice raised in exposure of
their aims.
Where they have power, they remove by murder their opponents.
They are adept in the use of the poison cup and the murder dagger.
The Jesuits' defense and support of the Inquisition is a well-known historical
fact.
By controlling the press and broadcasting, the process of conditioning the people is
skillfully manipulated.
Every Protestant should ask in view of these facts, can I continue to trust those
Protestant leaders who are continually under the influence of Jesuit priests in
the ecumenical dialogue.
An illustration of this is found in the newsletter of the 4th of this month,
1984, where three Protestant ministers show themselves to the jukes of the Jesuit
order.
The reverend Harold Good, Methodist.
The reverend Tom Craig, Presbyterian.
And the reverend Noel Mackey, Church of Ireland.
Attacking me for calling the Jesuits the Gestapo of the Roman Church.
These clergymen go on, I quote, It is our personal experience that members
of the Society of Jesus, Jesuits in Northern Ireland, are indeed dedicated to
their calling to commit themselves to Christ and His work through service to the
community.
In particular, we know that members of the Society have made an outstanding
contribution toward the healing of division in our province, and have earned
the trust and respect of Catholics and Protestants alike.
These three clergymen are jukes of the Roman Catholic Church and jukes of the
Jesuit order.
They have swallowed the bait, hook, line, and sinker, and have now become
self-appointed advocates of Jesuitry and defenders of the Jesuits.
How the Jesuits must sit back and laugh when they see how successful they have
been in their operation.
Rome's tactics.
She asked for toleration some 100 years ago.
She was so innocent, she said, it was wrong to treat her so.
It really seemed a pity that England should remember such trifles as the
Smithfield fires and Guido Fox November.
Our Senators, imagining there really was a change, admitted her to Parliament and
gave her system range.
She took her seat so modestly and seemed so very quiet that many people wondered at
the anti-popish riot.
But then, as now and ever, the woman wore a mask.
Apostasy orient was to subjugate her task.
The first she has accomplished.
The Church has gone astray, but subjugation turned the scale a bit the
other way.
She says, my church is holy, my popes are holy too, my fathers, brothers,
monks and nuns, what holy things they do.
The evils you may hear of may fill you with disgust, but no, the holiness of Rome
may never be disgust.
I ask for toleration.
You give it, but I give.
No toleration where I come.
All parish have I led, and o'er this sleeping country I pass with lengthy
strides, for if I conquer Britain, I have no foes beside.
What say you men of Britain?
You know the woman well, a perjured thing, a murderess, a woe unspeakable,
blighting the fairest country which bends beneath her sway.
Pray answer, will you take her within your homes today?
Stand up then, stand together, stand out and make her known, for where
she gains a footing, she never comes alone.
She comes with revolution and anarchy and change, for thought itself is fettered
where the scarlet woman reigns.
No blustering crowd is needed, we meet our foes like men.
Hear what they say and claim the right to have our say again.
Would God our feeble voices were steeped in living power to rouse our fellow
countrymen in this insipid hour?
God hold the lives of any who mount above the crowd with honest heart and burning
lip amid Rome's curses loud.
He sitteth king upon the floods and on a given day one of his mighty seas shall
sweep that godless thing away.
The timely words of Mrs. M.
A.
Chaplin.
This brings me to the end of this tape on the Jesuits, the Black Pope and his murder
men.
I trust you will get many copies of this tape, that you will give it the widest
possible circulation so that truth and its light will dispel the darkness and the
falsehood.
And the Ulster Protestants especially will know exactly who the Jesuits are,
who the Black Pope is and what is the origin and what is the strategy and what
is the goal of the Jesuit order in Northern Ireland.
And those Protestant clergymen who are dupes of the Jesuitical system,
who are seeking to undermine and betray our Protestant faith and heritage,
spurn them as a plague, obey the scriptures, come out from their churches
and from their associations and stand true to God in this evil day of apostasy and
declension.
The Church of Rome thinks that through the ecumenical movement she will take over the
Protestants of this land.
Let her know that there are 7,000 even in this day who haven't bowed the knee to the
papal veil and with the sword of God and the strength of God we will resist to the
death her machinations, idolatry, tyranny, priestcraft and popedom.
May God make us faithful unto death and then we shall receive the crown of life.